You are here:   Constitutional Affairs > A Norwegian Thatcher?
 

Daniel Johnson: Your party, the Progress Party, has sometimes been accused, on the left and in parts of the media, of being far-right, comparable to Le Pen - what is your answer to that?

Siv Jensen: First of all, it's important for me to clarify what we stand for. We are a classical liberal party, and are very much in favour of market mechanisms. We seek to improve the competitiveness of Norway, which is actually getting worse and worse. And when it comes to what is, I guess, the most critical issue, immigration, I believe that we stand for the exact same views as those held by the Liberal Party of Denmark, which is in government. We also share the views of [French President] Nicolas Sarkozy and, I believe, some of those prevalent among the Tories today. So we are very mainstream, I would say, for Europe these days. We need to do something about immigration, because if we don't, as a very small country on the outskirts of Europe, we will end up with all kinds of problems.

DJ: What is your party's policy on immigration?

SJ: We have had very, very poor integration in Norway over the past 30 years, and that has resulted in some very critical things. First of all, you see women now, even with Norwegian citizenship, who don't know anything about their rights in a free modern country. They are kept locked away, they don't know any Norwegian, they are totally incapable of taking part in their children's upbringing. I think it's very strange, because one of the good things about living in the Western world is that as a woman you have total freedom. And their rights are in practice non-existent, because we let them bring the bad sides of their culture. I believe that that is what they originally fled from, so I really don't understand that.

You see young girls being put through forced circumcision, which is not acceptable. There are also a substantial number of forced marriages, and the authorities just let it happen. So I think this is the critical test, not only for Norway but for all of us, when we fight for human rights in other parts of the world and fight for women's rights. But it's not really something that we take seriously enough. I mean, when women parade in Oslo on 8 March (International Women's Day), they have old feminist slogans. This is silly really because Norway is a country of equality. What they should be more focused on are the women in third-world countries, in Afghanistan for instance, where they are so oppressed. It's ridiculous that we can let this happen.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
MrKay
January 22nd, 2009
3:01 PM
The main reason why Jensen's party will not achieve power after this fall's election is of course their steadfast refusal to approach the parties with which it is most natural for them to cooperate, in this case the liberals. Jensens inability to understand that 25% of the votes alone does not power make will ensure another four years of social democrat rule and effectively mean that a quarter of Norway's voters will effectively have wasted their vote. And no, jdyer... Norway does not have a problem with antisemitism. The only way to conclude that is to take a few statements made by more or less informed individuals and then turn then into blanket statements regarding the Norwegian people as a whole.

Humber
January 22nd, 2009
3:01 PM
kari nordmann; For instance, Dagens Næringsliv, the financial daily, wrote about this in May 2006 in a lengthy and thorough piece called "Pengene bak FrP", written by journalist Lars Backe Madsen (Saturday edition, not online.). Whether such support, probably at its strongest around 30 years ago, should have any influence over your political preferences today is another matter.

fiXXXer
January 22nd, 2009
11:01 AM
Ole Chr Berge: What was the first thing Høyre did when they came to power last time? Changed most of those spots. jdyer: Just because people are horrified by the brutal slaughter of civilians does not mean they hate jews, semites of the state Israel. Just what the state is doing. The same people that meant freedom of speech is so important in the cartoon crisis is the same people calling you a nazi whenever you have something to say they dissagree with. Go figure.

jdyer
January 21st, 2009
10:01 AM
Norway has a real problem with antisemitism: "Norwegian envoy: Israel, Nazis the same Jan. 21, 2009 Etgar Lefkovits , THE JERUSALEM POST A Norwegian diplomat based in Saudi Arabia has sent out e-mails from her Foreign Ministry e-mail account equating Israel's offensive against Hamas in Gaza with the systematic mass murder of six million Jews by the Nazis. The e-mail, sent out by Trine Lilleng, a first secretary at the Norwegian Embassy in Riyadh, includes a juxtaposition of black-and-white pictures from the Holocaust with color images of Operation Cast Lead. "The grandchildren of Holocaust survivors from World War II are doing to the Palestinians exactly what was done to them by Nazi Germany," the e-mail states. A copy of the e-mail was obtained by The Jerusalem Post." Given that Norwegians colloborared with the Nazis in sending many of its Jews to death cmaps this kind of behavior is disgusting. http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1232292920832&pagename=JPost%...

Ole Chr Berge
December 11th, 2008
12:12 PM
This is an interesting article. Some better contextualization maybe warranted. Norway is a deeply politicized society where the NGO sector is for the main part state funded. The Labour party has created a system that is massively rigged against the opposition. The mode is one where "networks" have been created by systematic supporting party nomenclature. Today most leaders of large NGOs are card holding Labour members. The same is the case in the bureaucracy. The government news outlet, the NRK proudly professes that no-one in their organization votes Frp and the leader of their news team states before the last round of elections that she supported Labour - then she went on to cover the elections.

Kari Nordmann
December 9th, 2008
1:12 PM
You shouldn't believe everything you read on wikipedia, dear Hakon. It is absolutely ridiculous to claim that FrP has been funded by the apartheid regime. Please provide evidence before making such idiotic accusations. Your entire letter just proves how semented the Norwegian political landscape is and how desperate the opponents of FrP are. It really proves everything written in the article above!

Hakon
December 5th, 2008
5:12 PM
Mr. Bawer is notoriusly misinformed about scandinavian poltics. Factual errors - like the absurd claim that the dansh Social Democrats have been "in power since 1924" - are easy to spot, but his attempt at analysis may be harder for the average non-svandinavian to see. Actually, the danish party Venstre (Liberals) is a better choice to view as the siter party to FrP. Jensen - something she actually point out herself in the interview. One of the main reasons why FrP's immigration politics are being met with suspicion is the party's history of defending South Africa's apartheid regime, a regime which also financed the party during its early years. It is definitively not "widely assumed" that FrP will form a government after the next election. The 2005 election gave them 22% of the vote - their best result ever - and there is no chance for FrP to be a part of any government without joining a coalition with the conservative Høyre. The problem here is that Høyre and FrP strongly disagree on immigration politics and the climate change issue. If you have further plans to report on scandinavian politics, I would strongly suggest that you employ writers who - at least to some degree - know and understand svandinavian politics. (Plase excuse my english, as it is not my native language.)

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.