You are here:   Civilisation >  Books > The Dreyfus Affair Of Our Age
 

Rushdie's autobiography has two sets of heroes, who look all the more heroic when set against the politicians and intellectuals of Left and Right. The liberal chattering classes, who are the butt of so much mockery, behaved impeccably. They hid Rushdie in their homes, and although Literary London is the most gossipy corner of the planet, never revealed the locations of his hiding places. The other heroes are the protection officers of the "A squad" of the Metropolitan Police's Special Branch, who worked on the Rushdie "prot", and maintained their honourable record of keeping their charges alive. ("We're not like the Americans," they told him. "They lost one president and nearly lost another.") In 2003, when the security services decided that the threat had passed after 13 years, Special Branch threw a party for Rushdie at New Scotland Yard. We "want to get as many of the lads together as possible," said one officer. "It's been one of our very longest prots, and there's a lot of pride in what's been done, and a lot of appreciation for what you endured."

In their way, the cops knew what Rushdie meant when he said, "Wherever in the world the little room of literature has been closed, sooner or later the walls have come tumbling down." It is to Britain's dishonour that too many of their supposed superiors did not.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Martin Podhurst
December 22nd, 2012
12:12 PM
This is an important review with a great, all too appropriate title. Just read Zoe Heller's smug review and yours is spot on. Thank you.

Ed Cottrill
November 23rd, 2012
11:11 PM
Great piece, Nick. Rushdie did make some comparisons between Britain and Nazi Germany in his essay, "The New Empire Within Britain," published in 1982. Rushdie does say, "Britain isn't Nazi Germany," but he also states that Britain, unlike Nazi Germany, "has never been cleansed of the filth of imperialism. It's still there, breeding lice and vermin, waiting for unscrupolous people to exploit it for their own ends." Howe's statement, though, was reported as (I can't say I heard it), "The British Government, the British People, do not have any affection for the book. The book is extremely critical, rude about us. It compares Britain with Hitler's Germany." So Howe was eager to affirm a lack of "affection," on behalf of the government, for a book he had not read. The government apparently so cherished its relationship with Iran that their first concern was to put together a poorly-researched brief distancing themselves from Rushdie. And was Rushdie's 1982 essay fair comment? Look no further than, e.g., the comment section of the 11 September Daily Mail story on Rushdie, for expositions on "what I can't stand about him," and, "we have this guy to blame for the rise of modern day Islamic Extremism." Astonishing.

Anonymous
November 6th, 2012
2:11 PM
Well said Nick. This is a well-written and important book, and its importance has nothing to do with whether you like Salman Rushdie or his work. Their stance on the fatwa is a good rule of thumb for assessing the politicians and writers of the time.

Charles Lambert
October 26th, 2012
10:10 AM
I still remember the despicable Shirley Williams bleating on about the 'deep offence' caused by Satanic Verses (in my opinion, Rushdie's best novel...) and the 'inappropriateness' of his receiving a knighthood... And the tongue-lashing she received from Hitchens (C) as a result.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.