You are here:   Defence > Faking a Killing
 

On September 30 2000, two days after Ariel Sharon, then the leader of Israel's opposition Likud Party, went for a walk on Temple Mount, Palestinians mounted a demonstration at Gaza's Netzarim Junction. A 55-second piece of video footage of that demonstration, transmitted that day by the French TV station France 2, was to cause unprecedented violence in the Middle East and throughout the world.

The footage, with a voice-over by France 2's Jerusalem correspondent, Charles Enderlin, showed what was said to be the killing of 12-year-old Mohammed al-Dura by Israeli marksmen. Viewers saw the child crouching in terror behind his father, Jamal, as they sheltered next to a barrel under what Enderlin said was Israeli gunfire, and then slumping to the ground as Enderlin pronounced that he was dead.

That image of the boy screaming in terror before being killed was uniquely incendiary. It portrayed the Israelis as diabolically gunning down a child in cold blood, even as he cowered for his life. It ignited the Arab and Muslim world with apparent proof that the Israelis were deliberately killing their children, inciting a murderous frenzy.

Al-Dura became a poster boy for the Palestinian and Islamist war against Israel and the West. The day after the France 2 broadcast, the second intifada erupted in its full fury; according to the 2001 Mitchell report, the two events were directly connected. Twelve days later, a mob of Palestinians shouting, “Revenge for the blood of Mohammed al-Dura” lynched two Israeli army reservists and dragged their mutilated bodies through the streets of Ramallah.

When al-Qaeda decapitated the journalist Daniel Pearl, the video of this atrocity was punctuated with references to al-Dura. After -September 11 2001, Osama bin Laden said: “Bush must not forget the -image of Mohammed al-Dura.” Several Arab countries issued postage stamps with his picture. On Palestinian Authority TV and in its school books, al-Dura’s example is used to encourage other children to emulate his spirit of “sacrifice”.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
pmk
June 27th, 2008
3:06 PM
So why should I ever care when Palestinians complain of aggression? They cried wolf with al-Dura and they will cry wolf in the future. Someday the attack will be for real and, like the villagers in the fable, I will shrug and go about my business. That's what happens to liars. No one believes them even if they tell the truth.

Carl in Jerusalem
June 27th, 2008
3:06 PM
Not only was Mohamed Al-Dura not killed, he got married in November 2007.

Simon Evans
June 27th, 2008
1:06 PM
Melanie Phillips is an apologist for the killing of children.

Anonymous
June 27th, 2008
1:06 PM
The year 2004 was a spike inte anti-semitic hate crimes. Enderlin should be charged with aggravated incitement to racial hatred.

Birgit VIOHL
June 27th, 2008
12:06 PM
Gideon Levy's article posted by Stefan Denis says it all. Thank you! One can not ignore that atrocities are commited and international organisations and media have the obligations to point to them - even when both sides of the conflict like to argue that the violence is justified. And while journalists should cover the conflict with the hightes integrity - one should not accuse International Organisations and media blindly and globally as liars and anti-semits. If the footage incidence tells us anything, than that people's suffering should not be instrumentalised for one's interests.

Anonymous
June 27th, 2008
12:06 PM
The media's compliance with Hamas, however much it is done through self-preservation, is probably the main reason the BBC's Balen report continues to be kept away from the eyes of the public.

Anonymous
June 27th, 2008
11:06 AM
Will the world listen? Will a latter day Emile Zola stand up and say again, J'accuse in the face of this massive injustice or have we all fallen into the swamp of EU/BBC/UNHRC/OIC lies and anti-semitic discrimination? Muslims have appropriated the media stage for reasons I cannot comprehend. This deeply conservative right wing sect has ring fenced themselves in a collaboration with the left in the most unlikely coupling in history. The left talks of human rights, feminism, tolerance, equality and never balk at imposing it's wildest forms of ideology on us all yet look to the Middle East and Pakistan where not one of those stances is believed, never mind acted upon. We have to wake up and realise that taqiya is the modus operandi and basically never believe a word uttered unless proven by outside sources. That is the lesson we should take from this, but will we?

Paul Stephen
June 27th, 2008
11:06 AM
Sharon visited the Temple Mount in 2000 - not in 2003.

Stefan Denis
June 27th, 2008
10:06 AM

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.