You are here:   Features > What is the Good of Establishment?
 

It is true, sadly, that in the following 12 decades the political persecution of Catholics and non-conformists was intermittently brutal. Nevertheless, even during that long period of sectarian hostility, civil war and government repression, the Church of England managed to generate and sustain a liberal tradition. I refer immediately to the intellectual community that the convivial Lucius Carey, Second Viscount Falkland, gathered around himself at his Oxfordshire home in the politically tense 1630s. Alarmed at the rising stridency of rival certainties and appalled by the ensuing violence, this "Great Tew Circle" championed the use of reason in matters of religion, followed Erasmus (and St Paul) in distinguishing between fundamenta and adiaphora, advocated tolerance on matters indifferent, and looked for the reunion of Christendom. The reasonable and pacific temper of this body of lay Anglicans is well expressed by Falkland himself in his discourse, Of the Infallibility of the Church of Rome

"[...] it is plaine, that he [the emperor Constantine] thought punishing for opinions to be a mark, which might serve to know false opinions by [...] I am sure Christian Religions chiefest glory being, that it encreaseth by being            persecuted; and [...] me thinks [...]               everything is destroyed by the contrary to what settled and composed it... I desire recrimination may not be used; for though it be true, that Calvin had done it, and the Church of England, a little (which is a little too much) [...], yet she (confessing she may erre) is not so chargeable with any fault, as those which pretend they cannot, and so will be sure never to mend it; [...]

"I confess this opinion of damning so many, and this custome of burning so many, this breeding up those, who knew nothing else in any point of religion, yet to be in a readinesse to cry, to the fire with him, to hell with him [...] These I say, in my opinion were chiefly the    causes which made so many, so suddenly leave the Church of Rome

"[...]If any man vouchsafe to think, either this [discourse], or the authour of it, of value enough to confute the one, and informe the other, I shall desire him to do it [...] with that temper, which is fit to be used by men that are not so passionate, as to have the definition of reasonable creatures in vaine, remembering that truth in likelyhood is, where her author God was, in the still voice, and not the loud wind; [...] 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
obreption
March 31st, 2011
2:03 PM
Perhaps the writer ought to be reminded of Her Majesty's styles and titles and other oaths taken at the Coronation. The Church of England may be established in England, it isn't in Wales and it certainly isn't in Scotland. The Church of Scotland is protected by the Sovereign's oath to maintain the Presbyterian nature of the Church. During the Enlightenment, there were many arguments for disestablishment. Many thought (Hume and others) that it might be best to leave the established churches to fade, as has happened in the Church of Sweden, and to some extent within Scotland and England. What is deceit is when some cleric - whether Roman, Anglican, Rabbi, Hindu or Imam - decides to exact political influence by denial of such 'gifts' as 'sacraments' to those that do not uphold their views. Given the recent child sex abuse cases around the world, we don't need any advice from some theologians whose names escape me. In ecclesiastical terms, deceit can be described as an obreption, a modern day mot du jour.

TreenonPoet
March 31st, 2011
1:03 PM
"...let me make clear right at the beginning what I have in mind. First there is the Coronation Service, in which the head of state, kneeling, receives authorisation from above, not from below." Thank you for making it clear so early in your article that it is not to be taken seriously. The establishment seeks to propagate the lie that there is a higher authority, then claims entitlement to power bestowed by that authority. Deceit and fraud are not a good basis for government.

John Dale
March 31st, 2011
12:03 PM
What utter drivel. This just serves to convince me even more so that we should disestablish as soon as possible.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.