You are here:   Boris Johnson > What We Didn't Know About Boris and Ken
 

As for Livingstone, virtually all his Labour colleagues abandoned left-wing politics in the 1990s. As the markets boomed and globalisation seemed secure, their task became to imagine what middle-aged, middle-class swing voters in middle England wanted and give it to them. Or, as a shocked but still sardonic Alistair Darling put it to me on the night after the Lehman Brothers crash had ripped through the City, "All my life people have been saying to me: Alistair, stop being so left-wing, move towards the centre ground, become more moderate...Now they want me to nationalise the fucking banks!"

Livingstone, according to popular perception, has stuck to left-wing ideas all his life. Far from rejecting him, as political orthodoxy predicted they must, the voters saw him as a rare man of principle who defended the common people against the lies and machinations of the manipulative new elite.

The one unforgivable crime in the old politics was to run against your party. Livingstone ran against Labour to be Mayor of London — and, even more unforgivably, won. He pretty much endorsed Islamic Forum Europe, an offshoot of the extreme — Right Bangladeshi party Jamaat-e-Islami, as it fought Labour in London's East End. Instead of renouncing the turncoat, London Labour Party members voted overwhelmingly to put him forward as their official candidate for the May 2012 mayoral fight with Johnson.

It is fitting that the only two mayors of London have been Johnson and Livingstone. Elected mayors are almost Bonapartist in their disdain for the old checks and balances of liberal democracy. In London, the members of the assembly are not an effective legislature with the power to hold the executive in the form of the mayor to account. The only power they have is to amend the mayor's budget. They cannot do even that unless two thirds of members agree. Nor is the mayor constrained by his party. Prime ministers in parliamentary democracies are hedged and, on occasion, deposed by their colleagues. A directly-elected mayor can ignore all around him. He is not a primus inter pares but an elected dictator. He appoints his own cabinet of placemen and bureaucrats, who have no electoral bases of their own. He can do what he wishes until the viewing public votes on whether to throw him out of the Big Mayoral House or let him stay for another term.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anna
November 26th, 2011
8:11 PM
Your critique of of our two heroes is informative, if not entirely unexpected! But I'd rather have Boris's naked ambition than Ken's anti-semitism, Islamist lickspittling, and nutty support for various South American dictators. I'm probably a voter you wouldn't agree with. To date a committed Conservative, probably rather on the right, I have never, ever, understood anti-semitism. It is rooted in historical ignorance, bigotry and some weird conspiracy theories. It belongs in the Dark Ages, not the 21st century. It is profoundly depressing that so-called 'progressives' are so keen to promote it.

dirigible
November 25th, 2011
1:11 PM
"Occupy the London Stock Exchange are not producing a more open breed of politicians, but allowing cunning charlatans to hide their true natures" You were covering these cunning charlatans for how many years, and OLSX have been in place for how many months?

terence patrick hewett
November 24th, 2011
9:11 PM
If Bozza is Bertie Wooster, then Red Ken is surely the Marxist revolutionary and sardine aficionado, Comrade Butt the inamorata of Charlotee Corday Rowbottom.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.