You are here:   Cologne assaults > Let Justice Be Done Though The Liberal Heavens Fall
 
Yeah, right, as they say in New York. No work of fiction was a worse guide to the future. No pretence that the elite were the new victims of injustice was as risible. From 1990 until the crash of 2008 the wealthy enjoyed a new gilded age so lucrative the obscure word “oligarch” — from the Greek oligarkhēs: oligoi “few” + arkhein “to rule” — passed from the lectures of classical historians into common usage. In London and New York, not one financier went to jail after the banking system they had looted so long and lustily collapsed. You do not find “masters of the universe” justly or unjustly detained in Anglo-American prisons. You find who you have always found: the poor, the black and the mad. A quarter of British prisoners were brought up in care, 29 per cent experienced child abuse, nearly half do not have a single educational qualification, and a good two thirds had been unemployed on the outside. I could go on, but I am sure you get the point: Old Etonians or Harvard alumni are not scratching their names on cell walls.

As for rape now, as always, the rapist is likely to be a man the victim knows, not a Muslim stranger or migrant who landed in Lesbos last month.

That said — and it is not said enough on the Right — suppose you were writing a novel about miscarriages of justice in 2016. What people and ideas would go up in flames in a modern bonfire of the vanities? Feminism would be the first to burn, because in our time of neurotic racial tension, certain crimes by certain men cannot be punished or even discussed. Their victims should lie back and think of multiculturalism. They should take one for the team.

In Britain it is hard to separate new prejudices from old. The women sexually abused in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013, predominantly by gangs of British-Pakistani men, were white, working-class girls. Chavs, in other words, whose sufferings the authorities habitually ignore. But you have to be blind to ethnic politics to think that the race of their abusers did not help them get away with rape. Denis McShane, the Labour MP for Rotherham at the time, said:

I think there was a culture of not wanting to rock the multicultural community boat if I may put it like that . . . As a true Guardian reader, and liberal leftie, I suppose I didn’t want to raise that too hard.

Professor Alexis Jay’s report on the scandal said:

Several councillors interviewed believed that by opening up these issues they could be “giving oxygen” to racist perspectives that might in turn attract extremist political groups and threaten community cohesion.

The Victims’ Commissioner, Louise Casey, added a further fear: that truth-tellers would themselves be denounced as racists.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Stephen Fox
March 17th, 2016
2:03 PM
Surely this equating of injustice with self loathing is beside the point. Every society, whether human or animal distinguishes between insider and outsider, to the detriment of the latter. It is not merely understandable, but indeed is essential to survival. Self loathing, as it is currently practised in the West, is NOT survivable. We no longer really care about, for example, underage girls in Rotherham, Manchester, or Oxford, or women raped in Sweden, or people massacred in Paris. Oh, we have a candlelit vigil, and sing imagine, and three days later we move on. The corrosive effect of all this is huge. I have great respect for Nick Cohen, and What's Left was a big step for me in the migration from liberal to conservative that so many (and yet not nearly enough) have made in the last 20-30 years, but I now think the gap he attempts to bridge has become the Grand Canyon.

Roger Hicks
February 26th, 2016
9:02 AM
It is interesting to consider that in the past "nation states" were inclined, often ruthlessly, to suppress "diversity" in the interests of "national unity". Some "nation states", like China and Turkey, still do. So what caused Britain, America and other western "nation states" to flip to the opposite, of promoting and celebrating "diversity"? Did they do it from the goodness of their ruling elites' hearts, or was there a power-political motive to it? There was, of course, a power-political motive to it, in the form of the age-old strategy of “divide and rule”, whereby society is divided into a morally superior, now supposedly "colour-blind", elite and the morally inferior, naturally (human nature being what it is) less colour-blind, masses, who must submit to the authority of and domination by their "moral superiors". Post-racial multiculturalism is, in effect, a secular replacement for the power-political role of medieval church ideology, "original sin" (disobedience of divine, i.e. priestly/state authority) being replaced by "racial prejudice" (the natural human inclination - like original sin - to identity with members of one's own tribe, race or ethnic group, which absurdly was made responsible for the Holocaust and equated with the evils of Nazi racism), which only submission to priestly/academic/political/state ideology and authority can save us from eternal damnation for, not as heathens and heretics, as in the past, but as "bigots" and "racists". It began as an understandable overreaction Nazism, before being transformed into an instrument of socio-political intimidation, rewards, punishments, manipulation and control, just as medieval church ideology once served: http://unapprovedcomments.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/the-wests-overreaction-...

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.