You are here:   Archbishop Vincent Nichols > Friends and Saints: Newman's Last Mystery
 

It is perhaps not surprising, then, that in 1876, in stipulating his requirements for burial, Newman wanted permanently to leave a sign, redressing the balance, pointing away from himself, towards his community and under the one Cross.

In wishing to be buried in the same grave as Ambrose St John, Newman was conscious of being buried also alongside the adjoining grave of Father Joseph Gordon. Then, in 1878, there followed the death of Father Edward Caswall. His labours had built up the community and the parish from the outset. It was Caswall who, together with Ambrose St John, had taken on so much, and had thereby enabled Newman during the years 1852-8 to spend time in Ireland, not without some cost to the Birmingham community. Newman was never forgetful of the cost paid, both temporally and spiritually, by his brethren. As death approached, he signalled his intention of commemorating their contribution by drawing up a document illustrating his idea of the graves under a cruciform plan. He wished to be buried near the saints, in the plural: in the company of Father Joseph Gordon, Father Edward Caswall, and Father Ambrose St John.

Newman was well aware that in the fourth century St Ambrose had transferred the bones of the martyrs from their burial place to his Milan basilica. The relics of the saints reinforced the Bishop in his mission to the poor and needy. The patronage of the saints was a protection for the city and people in the struggle of the Church against the worldly power. Newman's Oratorian vocation, more-over, committed him to the tradition of St Philip Neri and of Cardinal Baronius. In 16th-century Rome, the Oratorians had revived the practice of the veneration and translation of relics from the catacombs to the churches of the city and beyond. The relics of the martyrs, taken from the catacombs, were transferred to the holy places of Christendom and the newly-emergent territories overseas.

Contact with the relics was contact with Rome; contact with Rome was contact with the early Church; from the Church's holy places, beginning with the tombs of the Apostles and Martyrs, and the basilicas built over them — St Peter's, St Paul's, Santa Croce, San Lorenzo — Christianity had extended from Rome to the barbarian world and, with it, the practice of burial ad sanctos. The shrines of Christendom had become the cradle of Christian 

Europe. Now, in the 16th century, a "New Church", the Chiesa Nuova (1575), arose amid the ruins of Rome. Through relics "translated" from the catacombs, Catholic Rome rediscovered its contact with the early Church, Christian Europe recharged its Catholic identity, and a new religious energy  linked its missions overseas, in a Communion of Saints uniting the living and the dead. The Christian cosmos was resumed.

All this Newman knew. He had publicised it all his life: first in projecting the Lives of the Saints, promoted from Littlemore after 1841, and then under the auspices of the Birmingham Oratory, as a means of awakening the English-speaking world to a history deeper and more truly communitarian than the contemporary Whig interpretation of the English past. To rediscover the saints was to rediscover the holiness of God. God, as the Church proclaimed, was "glorious in His saints".

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
JCF
October 9th, 2010
8:10 PM
"suddenly ejected, banned from the Newman beatification ...and gagged. . . . Roman Catholic insiders suggest that it was the Birmingham Three’s defence of traditional teachings on sexual morality, and their belief that Church should challenge State" Let me get this, um, straight: they were banned for "defense of traditional sexual morality" and "challenging the State" (on civil unions and same-sex adoption)... ...MORE THAN THE RCC ALREADY DOES??? This "Roman Catholic insiders" allegation doesn't pass the smell test!

Anonymous
September 25th, 2010
1:09 PM
This article tells us nothing at all about the circumstances leading up to the removal of the three clerics from The Birmingham Oratory. We would be foolish indeed to accept that Fr. Fenlon was banished from his home for five years, on the strength of the opinions he expresses in the above piece. The authorities went to great lengths to separate the three, to date we have not learned the truth, that remains to be uncovered.

CharlieGriffith
September 23rd, 2010
11:09 PM
...how can anyone at all presume to know what was in Newman's mind at the last?....other than his last Will and Command...? With what smug certitude can anyone partially adhere to his last Command, while "...the church had her way also..."...by having part of his remains buried specifically where he chose not to have them buried? What rationalized hypocrisy this exhibits.

irenpip
September 23rd, 2010
5:09 PM
At last a superb and scholarly piece on Newman's final wishes. The false and highly misinformed and regrettably inadequately challenged claim that Newman wished to be buried alongside his friend Fr. Ambrose St. John as an expression of their unspoken homosexual love is here exposed for what it is- a centrepiece of innuendo manipulated by others including so called Catholics to further their agenda to equate same sex unions [and ultimately gay 'marriage'] with union between a man and a woman - a dogma the Catholic Church can NEVER alter now matter how much others try to spin Newman as some kind of gay saint of conscience.

Jakob Knab
September 23rd, 2010
4:09 PM
In the summer of 1828 Newman set about to read the Fathers of the Church chronologically, beginning with St Ignatius of Antioch. And the young vicar of St Mary’s Oxford came across these famous lines: “I am God's wheat, and I am ground by the teeth of wild beasts that I may be found pure bread [of Christ]. Rather entice the wild beasts, that they may become my sepulchre and may leave no part of my body behind, so that I may not, when I am fallen asleep, be burdensome to any one. Then shall I be truly a disciple of Jesus Christ, when the world shall not so much as see my body. (Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Romans; Ch. 4:2)

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.