You are here:   Columns >  Manchester Square > The Voice of Conscience
 

Not every part of Benedict's message was congenial, however. He was quietly insistent that the State must not deny freedom of conscience to Catholics and other religious people. If it does, the Church enjoins passive disobedience. What the Pope means by "the legitimate role of religion in the public sphere" is the development of an idea he set out in the book Without Roots that he wrote with Marcello Pera: "A civil Christian religion that can shape our conscience as Europeans." Benedict's civil religion embodies the moral principles of the Judaeo-Christian tradition. Such a minimalist civil religion, designed to allow space for religious freedom within our secular polity, has much in common with the Anglican settlement, with its self-denying ordinance not to make windows into men's souls; but the very notion of an established religion is now decaying fast. Christians, Jews and others fear that faith is now increasingly identified in public discourse with what the Pope calls "distorted forms of religion such as sectarianism and fundamentalism", especially in their Islamic varieties. But Benedict reminds us that reason without faith will also take pathological forms, whether totalitarian ideology or eugenics. Faith and reason need one another, declared the Pontiff, "for the good of our civilisation". 

It would be naive to suppose that such entreaties could alone deflect the course of the secular mainstream. No sooner was he gone than the political class wallowed in its own "religious" festival: the party conferences. But the national conversation has benefited from Benedict's call to listen out for the still small voice of God. Newman confessed that, "were it not for this voice, speaking so clearly in my conscience and in my heart, I should be an atheist". We all have an inner voice that we call conscience, and whether we believe its source is divine or not, we cannot and should not try to silence it.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
mm
October 6th, 2010
10:10 PM
Hitler was anti-christian & the catholic church opposed him- but too timidly out of fear for what he would do. The Nazis were atheists or pagans not christians- they thought that christianity was a jewish plot to enslave/weaken the aryans with a slave mentality ala Nietzsche. At least try to learn some history.

John
October 6th, 2010
3:10 AM
Of course,as this site shows, many "catholics" were very sympathetic with Hitler and the nazis. Because Hitler was prepared to do something about the various "deviant" groups, large and small, in Germany at the time. www.nobeliefs.com/nazis.htm Hitler was of course admired and assisted by various influential people in both Europe and the USA. Prescott Bush did very nicely via his business interests. Plus the Holocaust was the INEVITABLE product of many centuries of church sponsored anti-semitism which manifested in all kinds of systematic persecutions and the scape-goating of Jews in the various anti-Jewish pogroms which were a feature of European history. This anti-semitism was/is even signaled by the fact that regular prayers (anyone for prey!) were said for the "conversion" of the Jews - to the "one true faith". And of course right-wing "catholics" were also instrumental in sheltering nazi war criminals, and assisting in their escape from Europe. And of course right-wing "catholics" were instrumental in the applied politics described in this essay (on a most revolting sado-masochistic splatter film) www.logosjournal.com/hammer_kellner Remember too, that the founder of the "religious" organization featured/criticized in the above review was made a "saint" by the previous pope.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.