All this complicates an operation that, even if ordered under more propitious circumstances, would still be daring and dangerous. Perhaps then the media frenzy was designed to help the IAEA, which had to resist huge political pressure from Iran's enablers China and Russia to make its report as crystal clear as possible about Iran's decade-long cover-up of its advanced military nuclear programme. The argument is simple: if Israel is isolated, it might act alone. But if the world treats Iran's threat seriously and acts upon it, Israel will take a back seat. If this was the case, it worked, for the report speaks for itself.
By 2003, Iran had managed to successfully test all the components of a nuclear device. That year, according to a widely publicised 2007 US intelligence estimate, Iran stopped its weapons programme but continued to conduct studies and simulations designed to verify the existing components.
It has also simulated how to shape uranium metal into spheres — the weapon's nuclear core; how to maximise the yield of a nuclear-armed implosive device; and how to mount it on a ballistic missile initially designed for conventional payloads.
The only missing piece remains Iran's ability to enrich uranium to weapons-grade level - something that Iran is, at least in theory, already capable of doing given its advances in the enrichment business in the last two years.
Israel, then, has every reason to be concerned. And so should everyone else who cares about the stability of the Middle East, the affordability of energy resources, and the future of the non-proliferation regime.
Will the international community act? Hard to believe, if one looks at the last ten years' track record of diplomacy. Only this time is different. Iran is nearing the point of no return.
And Israel, after two weeks of non-stop public debate, has gone quiet. The message is clear. The international community can stop Iran until the spring. After that, Israel might.

















