You are here:   Columns >  Points East & West > Europe's Double Standards
 
Consider the dispute over Cyprus — an EU member-state. The northern part of the island has been under Turkish occupation since 1974. The Turks, who, despite Nato membership, are guilty of ethnically cleansing their occupied territories of Greek Cypriots and installing colonists from the Turkish mainland, went much further than Israel has ever dreamed of in the West Bank. They created a Turkish client state that can only exist thanks to their political and economic support. The Turkish republic of Northern Cyprus is a Turkish colony in all but name — yet 40 years on, the international community accepts the frozen conflict on Cyprus as the lesser evil.

Further north, but still well within Europe's neighbourhood, Russia has occupied its fair share of territories, taking Georgia's Abkhazia and South Ossetia in 2008, Crimea this year, and fomenting separatist unrest in Eastern Ukraine. Russia did not just occupy territories: it established puppet states or annexed them.

To be fair, the EU has sanctioned Russia, but it will not do much more than that. Europe will issue empty statements about "de-escalation" but Georgia and Ukraine will not be armed to recover their lands by force. Their occupied territories will stay occupied.

The same goes for Nagorno-Karabakh and its surrounding provinces, which Armenia snatched away from Azerbaijan in the early 1990s. Armenia is by and large a Russian client-state. No one recognises the phantom republic it helped establish inside the Soviet-era autonomous province it won from Azerbaijan. Yet 20 years on, no one is rushing to look at the refugee problem caused by that war, nor warning darkly of time running out unless the seven Azeri provinces that Armenia conquered are duly restored to their rightful sovereign.

Europe has chosen to stay mum, rely on ineffective multilateral mechanisms of conflict resolution and basically acquiesce in the status quo.

Speaking of acquiescence, the Obama administration has just gone one step further and told China that it can keep Tibet. No one can expect the US or Europe to foment an insurgency in Lhasa. But this hardly says much for the coherence of Western policy.

It would be nice, of course, if Israelis and Palestinians could come to coexist peacefully. But nearly 100 years of conflict and the past 20 years of diplomatic failures should be enough evidence that insisting on an ideal yet elusive solution has served no one.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anonymous
January 3rd, 2015
4:01 AM
Get your facts straight about Nagorno Karabakh. It was never an Azerbaijani land, in fact it was "snatched" like you said , but from Armenia against the will of people who lived there and was given to Azerbaijan by the worst enemy of humanity by Stalin.

One stronly doubts your judgement
January 2nd, 2015
4:01 PM
Mr. Emanuele Ottolenghi,Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies in Washington and the author of five books, in English and Italian, four of which concern Iran. Considering that what you wrote here about Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia is a complete misrepresentation at a minimum, but simply speaking a lie, one should doubt the rest of your so called analysis. Unfortunately in our day and time, it is not the merit and decency that often places people in a senior position.

Russell Pollard
January 2nd, 2015
7:01 AM
You suggest that Armenia “snatched” NK away from Azerbaijan. The reality is that the citizens of NK (80% Armenian) voted to secede from Azerbaijan in a free and fair vote in February 1988. This was met by animosity and violence from Azerbaijan. Ordinary citizens of NK took up arms to defend themselves and their families. Full scale war broke out 3 years, after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the declaration of NK’s independence. Azerbaijan started an unrelenting campaign of bombing the Armenian people of NK. As the tide turned, in 1993/4 the NK Army re-captured their lost land and secured a buffer zone. This was not a “snatch” offensive but a long, defensive, and bloody operation made worse by the aggressive tactics of Azerbaijan. Many Armenians whose families had lived in NK for centuries were killed during that war. You also, somewhat witheringly, describe NK as a “phantom republic”. If you ever have the opportunity to visit, then you will realise that this is far from the truth. It has all of the infrastructure of an independent state ( Government, Telecoms, Army, Universities, Banks, Industry, Tourism etc) is a safe place to live, and has a vibrant and youthful population; 40% of the country were born since the ceasefire in 1994. It’s unrecognized status, and the constant threat of aggression from Azerbaijan are the major factors impeding its growth, and the peaceful freedom of its people. The refugee problem you mention is pertinent to both sides. Azerbaijan would not have so much of a problem, after 20 years, if its Government gave the people who were displaced, a free choice over their future rather than using them as pawns in an ongoing political game. The vast majority of the people who live in NK were born there, and whose families have always lived there , or were refugees from Azerbaijan in the early 90s. I would have thought that someone like yourself, from the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, would have been more sympathetic to the plight of people whose only wish is for their democratic right to be heard and respected.

I Dare to speak out
December 4th, 2014
7:12 PM
In all of the examples the author cites the indigenous population of the region supports the supposed occupying forces. Only in Palestine is an alien people forcibly occupying and ethnically cleansing the indigenous people, subjugating them on the basis of an odious ideology of racial supremacy. Worse than the Nazis.

amcdonald
December 2nd, 2014
6:12 PM
The absolute truth is Israel could do with being a bit bigger. Julie Burchill`s concise (if half-joking) conclusion is proof of our islamo-bent world leaders preference for the little swinging dicks of islamo- capitalism. No more mosques . Islam means slums and war.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.