You are here:   Columns >  Points East & West > Yes We Still Can
 

But the days of American hyperpower seem to have morphed into the days of American impotence. Those who longed for America's power to be checked should beware of what they wished for. With revolutions shaking the Middle East, America will at most "lead from behind", code for the abdication of America's leadership even at the price of inaction. When Sudan launches another round of its war of extermination against its largely defenceless neighbour, South Sudan, America will not even supply anti-aircraft guns, to say nothing of some rhetorical succour, which costs little. After nearly 16 months of ferocious government repression in Syria, America is behind — and not even leading — the ineffectual international efforts to solve the crisis. The result is horrific civilian casualties and the very possible survival of the Syrian regime which is inflicting them. In both cases, America's eclipse is counterbalanced by the rise of new powers who fill the void. They are not as benign.

This is the meaning of putting a check on the hyperpower, and the world of 2012 looks infinitely more dangerous as a consequence of declining expectations that America will intervene to solve crises.

In the past, America's military umbrella did not always open to protect struggling nations at the four corners of the earth. America did not always intervene; even when it did it sometimes happened late in the game and it was not always the best course of action. But it often made the difference. Its rhetoric of freedom offered hope to those under the boot of tyrants. And its record gave the impression that America might act on its words. Besides, the knowledge that America's aircraft carriers might be around the corner gave pause to those wishing ill upon its allies and friends.

That is no longer the case. America has disengaged. Its president seems to have bought Védrine's argument. And with that, America's competitors will gladly take its place. Their contempt for America is worse than their fear, because unlike their fear it feeds on America's weakness. They will reshape the world in their own image, unless America stops them.

A world at peace needs an American gendarme. The US's temporary retreat has left a sense that troubles will now fester and solutions may turn out to be worse than the problems — think of Russia bailing out Greece, Bashar al-Assad remaining in power in Syria, or Iran getting nuclear weapons. It is not a pretty picture.

And probably not one that even Hubert Védrine would subscribe to today.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anonymous
July 1st, 2012
7:07 AM
As I have argued for a while, though America is not the perfect superpower, the perfect superpower will never be achieved. But one thing that is true is that America is certainly better than any viable alternative; and historically America has probably been the most responsible superpower in world history, while also wielding more power than any other nation in human history.

donzi_boy
June 30th, 2012
9:06 PM
As long as Barack Obama is President America will only be a potential hyper-power.

No We Can't
June 30th, 2012
8:06 PM
"A world at peace needs an American gendarme." "No" to "Absolutely Heck No". The U.S. is not the world's police, on beck and call. And the U.S. taxpayer is not going to continue subsidizing in wealth and lives other nation's defense, a.k.a. NATO. What the U.S. needs going forward is real allies, pulling their own weight. Maybe that means the rest of the world isn't happy with the uncertainty. Too bad. Get off your behind and fix it yourselves.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.