You are here:   Economy > ONLINE ONLY: The "Greenhawk" Moment
 
Doubters remain. Few Americans are likely to view Bush and Rumsfeld as environmental heroes. Some skeptics see the “greening” of the Pentagon as an attempt to re-brand a military battered by far-flung wars and the dishonor of Abu Ghraib. And clearly the US Air Force, now the #1 user of renewable energy, can’t fly jets on gin (they have nonetheless begun to experiment with synthetic fuels derived from natural gas). Other skeptics contend that the rugged individualists of middle America are as unlikely to give up their Chevy trucks as they are to give up their guns. But caveat dubitor: there are precedents for the public following the Pentagon’s adoption of new technology, including the medium on which you’re reading this article now. Remember also that when the US army broke the color barrier after WWII and began to desegregate, the rest of America followed. As the army goes green...
View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
dave heasman
June 2nd, 2008
4:06 PM
"Wahabis and friends of Ahmadinejad sit atop two-thirds of the world's oil reserves." Canada and Russia you mean?

Rob
June 2nd, 2008
7:06 AM
Often military stuff is just plain costly. This allows them to take another look at solar technologies that are costly, but require only daylight for fuel. While, fuel convoying has been surprisingly successful in Iraq. Tanker trucks have been blown up on the way into Afghanistan from Peshawar Pakistan and this shows a weakness in being dependent on roads like the one through the Kyber Pass.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.