You are here:   Communism > A New Mutiny?
You can't request more than 20 challenges without solving them. Your previous challenges were flushed.
 
The Maoists are often referred to as Naxalites or Naxals, in homage to the bloody revolt that began in Naxalbari, West Bengal, in 1967. The first Naxalites were agricultural workers organised and led by Communists inspired by Mao’s China. The movement was joined by radical students enraged by the caste and landholding inequities of rural -India. They carried out a policy of “annihilation” of “class enemies”, assassinating university administrators, politicians and policemen before the movement was crushed, its key leader dying in police custody in 1972.

Naxalism never recovered in West Bengal, which is today governed by legal Marxist Communist parties. But it revived and spread widely in other eastern states, beginning in the 1980s, even before India’s liberated economy began to take off. The new Naxalism has little middle-class participation and no support from Beijing; it seems to be a genuine grassroots movement. Its cadres are recruited from the rural poor, the landless, from low-caste labourers oppressed by higher-caste landlords and above all from the so-called tribals or adivasis.

The adivasis are India’s aboriginal hill tribes – the subcontinent’s equivalent of Amazonian or North American Indians. Most are animists or Christians. They rank among India’s poorest inhabitants, have often been driven from their ancestral lands and say they are discriminated against by government officials. Certainly the hilly forested areas in which they live tend to be even worse served by the state than other parts of rural India: the schools lack teachers, government doctors don’t turn up to the clinics. Where there is education, it is often provided by Christian missionaries – or by the Naxalites. In some rural areas, villagers prefer the Maoists’ “people’s courts” to government ones, which can take years to resolve even simple cases.

The so-called Red Corridor stretches from the Nepalese border all the way to Tamil Nadu in the south and the easternmost parts of Maharashtra in the west. But it covers mostly rural jungle areas that are of little interest to tourists, and until recently, were of little economic significance. However, the large stretches of the country where Maoists are able to challenge or neutralise the authority of the state – 165 out of 602 districts – are of growing importance to Indian and foreign business. Several of the regions that have seen the fiercest fighting -between the Indian state and the Maoists are rich in iron ore, coal, bauxite and limestone – raw materials desperately needed by an expanding economy.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Uncle B
September 3rd, 2008
9:09 PM
If mankind had a common enemy they would have a common goal! Even in India where hunger is prevalent, people find time and reason to do destructive things. Not evengod can help us from ourselves, sick sick animals that we are!

Anonymous
August 6th, 2008
5:08 PM
Given the new and more or lessomnipresent conventional wisdom--American hegemony is dead because the US economy is doomed to be left in the dust by China and India--this piece very usefully reminds us that China and India have staggering problems of their own,generally much worse ones than the Americans face. It is interesting to speculate about which alleged challenger has worse (and generally underreported) problems: China, with its relative absence of effective law, kleptocratic elites, ecological catastrophes, looming demographic crisis and probable legitimacy crisis, or India, with its multiple nationalities and languages, simmering rebellions and radical inequality. My sense is that other than the first problem, which is not one China shares to anything like the same degree, India has the edge, with more rule of law, at least some elite political accountability, and a working federal system. And who knows how much underreported disorder occurs in China? The anecdotal evidence can be startling...Maybe Standpoint could run recurring features on the underreported bad news from both India and China. This was a fine piece of reporting.

Nirpal
August 1st, 2008
3:08 AM
There has never been a moment in India's history where some crisis has not been rumbling: famine, secessionist, environmental or sectarian. India has weathered them all. And India's democracy is not a gloss. It has a higher voter turn-out than the US, with the poor more likely to vote than the middle-class. The Maoists are not fighting for the poor - they are happy to exterminate them. A country with such levels of poverty and illiteracy will always be vulnerable to ideologues and messianic politics. But this insurgency, like the others, will end as the rebels terrorize and alienate the very population they gain their support from, who will themselves be given a greater stake in the Indian polity. The Maoists offer the people nothing - only a primeval existence with a marxist narrative. Only the govt can provide development, which in time it will. India's problems, like everything in India are immense - but resolvable.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.