You are here:   Dispatches > Caracas: Chávez's Secret Fan Club
 

Landing in Caracas just before last November's elections for governors, mayors and legislators, I found a city ravaged by ten years of the Chávez regime, pocked with the colourful posters of grinning candidates. Caraqueños - as Caracas inhabitants are called - have been torn apart by a low-level civil war of chavistas (as his supporters are called) versus opposition, with campaign posters standing in for gang colours. A preponderance of red means you're in a chavista area. Red portraits of Chávez himself painted on the walls means you are not in the Country Club any more, Toto. I drive until the posters turn blue, green or yellow.

Chávez has held a Wizard of Oz sway since he burst on to the political scene as a putschist general with his failed coup in February 1992. His one-minute TV appearance to call back his troops would make him a cult hero and change Latin America forever when he said his quest for social justice was unsuccessful "por ahora" ("for now"). But prevail he did at the next election, riding a wave of anger and riots all the way to the presidential palace.

In his decade as president, Chávez has parlayed socioeconomic resentment into near-invincibility. But the chinks in the armour were there for all to see in December 2007, when he lost a referendum on the constitutional changes that would have extended his dictatorial powers to rule by decree, suspending civil rights and effectively making him president for life. He quickly turned defiant: "For me, this isn't a defeat. This is por ahora."

Whether it was or not would be determined on 23 November, and no one was taking any chances. Chávez delivered fiery speeches every day, broadcast live on all six state TV stations before oceans of red. Ignoring his rants, the opposition toiled on. But would they be able to win over the throngs of chavistas?

Chavistas come in four broad categories. First, there are the poor ones. These are the ignorant and desperate hordes, filling the TV screens at every Chávez rally with a sea of red shirts that the rally organisers bribe them to wear with a combination of money and alcohol. They earn more by attending a rally than they would with an honest day's work, if they could get it. Regardless of their poverty, they continue to revere Chávez like a personal god or conquering hero, for he looks and sounds like them as he rants against the wealthy.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anonymous
January 4th, 2009
4:01 PM
I wonder if Ms. Neumann ever saw her wealthy family as part of the problem: The country's wealth managed by about five families, while the rest of the people are bereft of hope. Everyone in the 1970's oil boom, may have "felt" rich, but obviously that was an illusion. When people have no chance of building their own wealth it leaves a country open to the Castros and Chavezes and Stalins of the world. People who can leave; people who can't stay and pay the price.

Anonymous
January 4th, 2009
4:01 PM
That is what it is happening in Latin America, the red wave of populismo or the socialism moreno. In Brazil is not different wt Mr Lulla, a populist government full of corruption and scandals in all levels of his admnistation. The maximum example of this is Mr. Lulinha, son of him, from a simple doorman of Zoo, turned a wealthy man in Tele Communication in only 4 years government of his father. Of course all that in name of the moreno socialism. The poor Marx is revolving in his grave seeing what his ideas become. As he said the brazilan poet, who likes poverty is intellectual, not the ex syndicalist Mr. Lulla very close friend of Mr Chávez.

Anonymous
January 4th, 2009
3:01 PM
The above comments are made by people who would not live under Chavez. Easy to talk, easy to make left-wing points. But people in Venezuela have to live under the ridiculous and ferocious Chavez.

Alejandra
January 4th, 2009
2:01 PM
Great work! I think it's very important to get the truth out in the open. Reading this has been like looking in a mirror.I live in Caracas since 1994 and I have seen the decay first hand. People in other countries are fooled by Chavez's lies and it's important to set them staight.

Anonymous
January 4th, 2009
2:01 PM
Trickle down economics has long been disproved but the wealthy keep appealing to its theories as a strategy to avoid true economic reforms. The racism of the egregious "blue eyes" shows. The corruption and cronyism of which she writes is no different from the corruption and cronyism of the wealthy, say, e.g., the Bush regime in the U.S.

Anonymous
January 4th, 2009
1:01 PM
A remarkably one sided and disingenuous article. I'm surprised it got published.

Cornfusion
January 4th, 2009
12:01 PM
Witty but vacuous, Monica.

J. P. Ward
January 4th, 2009
11:01 AM
Following the defeat of Napoleon I the Aristos might have felt and written much the same about France on their return from England after what seemed so few years but which saw such real change.

Monica Renton
January 3rd, 2009
8:01 PM
is this a pamphlet?

Lucia
December 31st, 2008
3:12 PM
Vanessa, it is good news that Venezuelans are talking about politics and want to work together. Participatory democracy returns! please visit these two sites for a glimpse at how Venezuelans are working together http://www.europeancourier.org/Democracy_in_Venezuela_Blog.htm http://www.facebook.com/pages/Diego-Arria/103324305197 ¡Feliz Año!

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
More Dispatches
Popular Standpoint topics