You are here:   Dispatches > Caracas: Chávez's Secret Fan Club
 

And there it was: my grandfather's house, empty and decaying. I had lived there while doing summer jobs. It was here that my grandfather had entertained Gabriel García Márquez and former US Secretary of State James Baker. Sitting outside the rusting gates, I tried to recapture my past for my new husband, and in doing so to explain what has happened to my homeland, Venezuela, in the 10 years under President Hugo Chávez. Today, more people die violently every week in Caracas than in Baghdad.

"You see," I said, "this is what has happened all over, this decay. Once, it was not like this." "Yes," he replied, "I see." But I wondered if he did, as he craned his neck forward to peer through the windscreen to read the words Perros Furibundos ("rabidly fierce dogs"). He watched me as I pleaded at the gate, pressing the buzzer beneath a smashed lamp, the electronic eye of the surveillance camera too exhausted to register me. No guard opened the security window; no one spoke over the intercom. The only response was the tired bark of a lone dog, more jaded than fierce, and I wondered when was the last time he ate, or even saw a human being.

We had arrived in Caracas to attend an old friend's wedding, a traditional affair held at the Country Club. "You'll love it," I had enthused. "The old Caracas, that not even Chávez can touch." What I found, though, was very different from what I expected.

Decay was unimaginable when I was a child basking in the tropical sun in my own personal Eden of our Country Club home. The Caribbean's humidity, only 30 minutes away, was soaked up by the Avila Mountains. My blue-eyed Prague-born father would drive his Mercedes coupé home through the poor Puente de Chapellín neighbourhood. He and the locals would wave at each other, for there was no class hatred then. The rich owned the businesses that provided the jobs, and my family gave back to the country that took them in when they fled communist Czechoslovakia.

Although the poor vastly outnumbered the rich, the entire country felt rich from the oil boom of the 1970s, which made Venezuela the world's largest non-Arab oil producer. Mocking the poor Americans, who had always treated us as their mascots, was a national sport. Every week, people tuned in to RCTV to watch their favourite skit: two Venezuelans fly American Airlines to Miami to shop for the day with the refrain: "Está barato; dame dos." ("It's cheap; gimme two."). Last year, Chávez closed the station, saying it was pro-opposition.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
answers?
January 5th, 2009
2:01 PM
Three basic questions facing those who favor authoritarian or totalitarian governments: Would you want to live under one? Do you have the moral right to enjoy the freedoms (e. g., the right to hotly criticize your government, the right to organize demonstations against those in power, the right to work to remove those in power, etc.) that you would deny to others? If you claim that right, on what moral basis does it rest?

Anonymous
January 5th, 2009
1:01 PM
This article is clearly the very biased diatribe of a person who lived a very privileged life in Venezuela. Mr Chavez is not perfect, by any means, but his opposition is worse. During the 2001 coup attempt, they turned the tanks on te people. During the 2002-2003 strike, they tried to cripple the only livlihood of all Venezuelans. Yes, life in the Country Club is not the same as before, but the violence and class hatred comes more from the decades of abuse, of unbelievable discrepancies between the rich and the poor. Does the author remember the mass slaughter of civilians in 1989 as a result of Carlos Andres Perez' ill-considered economic policies and his government's brutal repression of civil unrest? Something had to change, and the change is happening , like it or not. True, this government has many flaws--corruption is rampant, there is more violence in the streets--but it has also made some important changes in the social structure, not only in Venezuela but in the rest of South America. A more balanced view might be more persuasive.

Anonymous
January 5th, 2009
11:01 AM
She should stop whinning. This is what's wrong with elitist thinking

Anonymous
January 5th, 2009
5:01 AM
wow, stuart... a bit difficult to think there is any hope for Venezuela if it must "reside in a rise in the rule of law" when the "law" is whatever the dictator says it is.

stuart munro
January 5th, 2009
1:01 AM
I'm afraid this article is not persuasive. After seeing John Pilger's film The War on Democracy, it seems clear that whatever faults Chavez has pale in comparison to those of his political opponents. Little tricks like the attempted armed overthrow of Chavez when was popularly elected, and the propaganda films released to the western press pretty much discredit the views of writers like Neumann. As for Venezuela, its hope for a peaceful future must reside in a rise in the rule of law. One facet of that would probably preclude private armed security forces.

Anonymous
January 4th, 2009
7:01 PM
I believe the author has fooled herself. She should question her child-eyes view of Venezuela. The adult might have noticed the dispossessed before Chavez rallied them. And the adult would have to decide whether the Chavistas are paid lackeys or worshippers of a Demi-God, whereas this author sees no contradiction in calling them both. The author expresses the paranoia of the rich in condemning hidden counry club Chavistas only to mention the paranoia explicitly while not seeing it in herself. Still, as an American, the day the people stop supporting Chavez is the day I will be happy to see him go.

Morris
January 4th, 2009
7:01 PM
I am an Italian born American who has family near Caracas and have viste there many times. In my humble opinion I have seen huge change from 1982 till 2008 in Venezuela. Basically from bad to good to great to o.k. to horrible to now utterly pathetic. What the heck is Chavez thinking? One of the greatest sins man can perform is greed. Do not let this wolf in sheep's clothing cloud the true good hearted, hard working spirit of the Venezuela majority

Pulseguy
January 4th, 2009
6:01 PM
Ms. Neumann's comment that there was no class hatred in the '70s suggests she is out of touch with what she writes. Of course, there was class hatred in the 70s; and the 60s, the 80's etc. There always is class resentment. And, the rich will always be villified in simplistic terms, as will the poor. Chavez will stay until even the hordes can see past his rhetoric, then he will escape with his billions and the average Venezuelan will be left with the clean-up.

Edward
January 4th, 2009
5:01 PM
Neumann's writings ensure continued success for Chavez. The only people who sympathise w/ Neumann are other Neumann's of which there are few and she writes even they are split. Good riddance.

Anonymous
January 4th, 2009
4:01 PM
If Hugo the Terrible stays there will be repression and death. If Hugo the Terrible goes there will be repression and death.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
More Dispatches
Popular Standpoint topics