You are here:   Civilisation >  Critique > The Hounding of M. F. Husain
 

The worst thing one could say about the Hindu nationalist charges was that they were true. By departing from equality before the law and universal principles, Gandhi had left India with no argument against sectarianism in whatever form it came. Hindu sectarians saw an opening and poured through it. They told the mass of Indians that they remain the victims not only of their former Muslim conquerors but of the former British conquerors too. The Raj's final imposition on India was to indoctrinate Nehru and his anglicised, British-educated contemporaries with alien ideas about the need for a democratic and secular constitution, they maintained. Like militant Islamists and so many pseudo-leftist Western academics, Hindutva nationalists damned human rights, including the right to free expression, as colonial impositions.

Bal Thackeray, Shiv Sena's leader, showed where the rejection of secularism led, in one of his many declarations of admiration for that ultimate cultural relativist, Adolf Hitler. He announced that Hindus must "shake off their stupor" and consider protecting their civilisation and culture. "If telling it like it is makes one a Nazi, I say: Fine, better that than the spineless, deaf, dumb, numb and blind state exalted as Nehruvian secularism. I wouldn't even spit on it." 

Thackeray and the many Hindutva politicians like him insisted that Hindus were put upon and cozened. To end the injustice, they must free themselves from their former oppressors and become a force the world must reckon with. 

Hence the destruction of the Ayodhya mosque, allegedly built by the conquering Mughals in the 16th century on the site of a Hindu temple, and the slaughter of thousands in the communal riots that followed. Hence the threats to the lives of historians who say that India has always been an amalgam of cultures, religions and ethnicities, or point out that some Hindu princes were as keen on sacking Hindu temples as the Mughal invaders were. And hence the campaign to persecute Husain.

As soon as Shiv Sena filed lawsuits against him, Husain had to absent himself from a celebration in the city of the Progressive Artists Group. If he had attended, the police would have arrested him for "disturbing communal harmony" — and there was a chance a religious mob might have killed him too. A group of young artists unfurled a banner at the party saying, "Husain, we miss you", but other guests were unimpressed when a Western collector insisted that they speak out on Husain's behalf. "Why doesn't he understand?" said one artist's husband. "This is like asking us to speak out in Berlin in 1936." 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Akshay
September 17th, 2015
1:09 PM
I have only two questions to all those people who support husain's controversial part of life, who doesnt bother about how insanely he hurted genuine feelings of crores of peoples... those questions are >How would you feel if someone ever publishes your mother's nude image in public? >How would you behave if someone represents your ideal personalities, your inspirations, you gods in a very inhuman and disrespectful way?? Husain did the same.He may be the Greatest artist ever lived. He may be next to picaso. but his contravercial art is a product of pure shame. you will ignore this comment or otherwise you will argue with me because you are as like so many other people who are not victim of Husain's irresponsible act.But before doing so ask both questions to your soul. Even if these questions doesnt disturbs you, Then I would love to hear from you.

Rajan Naidu
June 10th, 2011
11:06 AM
The most disgusting and despicable thing about M F Husain was the alliance of shameless, small-minded rabblerousers and thugs that gathered to threaten and relentlessly torment him, a person who harmed no one, human or divine.

Tim Footman
June 10th, 2011
10:06 AM
@Isha Agrawal: Allowing a man to live to 97 as a lauded, successful artist is a pretty feeble manifestation of divine punishment. What next, the comfy chair?

Isha Agrawal
June 9th, 2011
6:06 AM
Good news, God has punished the man at last who was guilty of hurting the sentiments of Hindus. Hindus across the world were demanding action against this man, but the impotant and so called secular indian govt did nothing to console the Hindus. Freedom of expression does not mean to hurt the sentiments of any community.

NMM
January 21st, 2011
3:01 PM
The Indian Art Summit (India's version of London's Frieze) is on in Delhi right now and for the first time in three years, M F Husain's paintings are being exhibited on a public platform. Despite threats, the organisers are going ahead on reassurance from the Delhi police that the paintings will be protected, no matter what. This just proves that if the law wants to stand up and protect life, limb and property, it can. The police's sudden willingness to play protector is no doubt the result of political direction from the top. If politicians hadn't winked at the vandalisation of Husain's works down the years, things would not have come to this pass. They're as bad as the Hindutva goons.

Vikram
December 31st, 2010
6:12 AM
The Shiv Sena is more than a "thuggish bunch of religious rabble-rousers". It is a neo-fascist organization in the truest sense of the word. Its founder Bal Thackeray famously kept a portrait of Adolf Hitler on his desk and has refered to him repeatedly as his 'inspiration'. His part in the Bombay riots and his talk of 'cleansing India of foreign Muslim influences' puts him very much in the Nick Griffin school of polity

NMM
December 22nd, 2010
7:12 PM
Excellent piece. The hounding of Husain is a blot on modern, mulitcultural India. I am glad, however, that you quoted the enlightened judgement of the Delhi high court. The two redeeming features in this pathetic story have been the progressive rulings from India's higher courts and the support from fellow artists, who have spoken out quite plainly about the injustice of the charges against Husain. At least two of them (Paritosh Sen and A Ramachandran)have made the point in the Indian press that Cohen also makes, that Husain is being hounded for being Muslim. One small clarification: there are five cases against Husain (all of which have been clubbed) and not "hundreds of criminal complaints" as is commonly believed.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.