You are here:   Dialogue > Bringing the House Down
You can't request more than 20 challenges without solving them. Your previous challenges were flushed.
 

SG: Well, you have to get the right actor to begin with.

DJ: I remember Edward Fox doing it brilliantly.

SG: It is something that a playwright has to acknowledge; actors do make an enormous difference to a part.

CS: Yes, but don’t sell yourself short. It is there in the text as well. DJ: It’s just been successfully revived.

SG: Yes, very charmingly by Nathaniel Parker, but what I’m really saying is that part of it is to do with the actor who embodies, and I hope slightly more than that, the character that you write. I thought Edward was something extraordinary in Quartermaine’s Terms. I couldn’t have conceived of him having that kind of strange aura about him, of poignancy, loss and charm. It was something unique to Edward. People still remember the performance, which for a playwright is a great nuisance because it’s much harder to revive. Actors don’t want to do a part that a living actor has made their own or that they think has made their own.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Peter Elmore
August 8th, 2008
2:08 PM
I agree with the sentiments expressed about Islam in the Theatre; a great big burkha-wearing elephant in the room. I have worked and lived in the Middle East where for the most part the concept of Theatre as we know it does not exist except for British Council productions of Drawing Room dramas, comedies and bog standard Shakespeare. The hand wringing Guardian readers would rather burn a "Joan of Art" at a stake fueled with Bibles than offend an Islamist. However I'm sure the "next big thing" from the subsidised theatre will be a biting satire on the persecution of homosexual bishops.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.