IB: Lennon is absolutely an art school person.
TB: And Mick Jagger and some members of Queen were out of art school, too. This is in answer to Ian's point about pop musicians not wanting to work with artists. But I think many of the more sophisticated or ambitious of them, people like Bowie and even the Rolling Stones and the Beatles, have ambitions which plug into a wider cultural context. Others are very modest in terms of ambition; an extreme example would be Larry Parnes's stable of rock 'n' rollers from the early 1960s, called things like Duffy Power and Vince Eager. Cliff Richard came out of that too.
IB: But that's performance art, in a way, more than music. The Sergeant Pepper thing was a bit of performance art, it was all about dressing up in funny costumes, and presenting a whole thing.
TB: It would be now, because they'd put it on a DVD, but in 1966 it had to simply go on a vinyl record, admittedly with a very striking cover.
DJ: Just to go back to where we started, on the political role of rock stars, do you think they get bored? Perhaps partly for the reasons that you suggested: that the music doesn't really progress very far. You do your thing, and that's it - all people really want is for you to do it again and again. So some of these people then seem to want to save the world; they feel that having created their musical product, they then owe something to society, or they have to become something else, go beyond being musicians, to become messiah figures.
TB: That's a very generous interpretation of their motivation. I think it's in part because they're fawned on and flattered by the politicians. It starts with Harold Wilson back in 1964, giving the presentations to the Beatles, and cuddling up to them, to acquire some of their charisma by osmosis, which he badly needed. It goes on right into the present day. If, for example, when Blair invites Noel Gallagher round to 10 Downing Street to meet him after the 1997 election, and tells him how wonderful he is, he begins to think, "Perhaps I'm not just a rock'n'roller after all, I'm someone more important than that." So I think it's because of the politicians, and the press, in particular, who fawn on them and tell them that what they're doing is not just recreation.
IB: I wonder if it works politically - I can't believe it had any effect on Blair except to make him look slightly ridiculous. In fact, it wasn't really Blair being politically canny, it was Blair's vanity that he was wrapped up in, and it actually made him feel very good about himself, to feel that he could mix with these people.
Post your comment
- The Socialism of Fools
- The Anti-Elitist Elite Versus the Underclass
- Putting A Value On Human And Animal Life
- American Jews and the Defence of Western Civilisation
- Is China Really a Threat to us?
- Will Germany be a Divided Nation Again?
- Europe, America and the Coalition
- Incurable Romantics
- Staving Off Despair: On the Use and Abuse of Pessimism for Life
- Can the Atlantic Coalition Hold?
- Has Britain Found a Role Yet?
- Life, Death and the Meaning of Cancer?
- Is the Party Really Over for Labour?
- Should Baby Boomers Feel the Pinch?
- Will the Tories Give us the Schools We Deserve?
- What Would Keynes Say?
- How European are the British?
- Speaking Truth Unto the BBC
- Booking a Place in History
- When Britain Feared the Blackshirts

















