You are here:   Dispatches > Mutinous Talk In The Highlands
 
“The estate system does not belong in the new Scotland,” says the electrician. “We want the land used for the common good.” It is a clue from the future that at their first conference as a swollen party a Land Reform Bill presented by Nicola Sturgeon was rejected. The proposed legislation was intended not only to force sporting estates to pay business rates but to strengthen tenants’ rights, install a permanent land commission and give Holyrood the power to force sales to certain community buyouts. 

Party radicals now want land reform to go further: not only to make community buyouts impossible to resist, but to ban landowners leaving their estates to a single heir, breaking them up over time. They want punitive taxes to force sales. They may not couch it in these terms but they want Scotland to follow Ireland, where before independence more than half the country was owned mostly by absentees in estates of 3,000 acres or more. A meat-mincer called land reform has all but eliminated them.

To nationalist activists, this is a tempting crusade. With Scottish independence off the agenda for the next few years, and these little platoons hungry for the ruling party to set about doing radical, transformative stuff, the grouse moors and deer forests are sitting targets. The new campaign, “Our Land”, is growing in popularity.

“We now run Scotland and we will manage this land a different way.”

But you cannot talk land reform without talking history.

“That happened after the dark . . .”

I’m sorry, what?

“Oh, I meant the Act of Union.”

Without prompting, the SNP activists begin talking constitutional history. I am told how the Statute of Westminster in 1931 returned sovereignty to colonial subjects like Canada and Australia and should have been applied to Scotland. I am told that the United Kingdom is the remains of the British Empire and must be broken up to be fully democratised, above all to crush the landowners’ club that is the House of Lords. Again and again, the Clearances are alluded to.  

“You know what,” says the Christmas tree salesman. “I know these hills, I know them, these bare places, and when you drive around there’s nothing. Miles and miles of nothing. And when I went to England, it’s like this, bam, bam — village after village after village.” He pauses, and catches his breath. 

“When I’m up the hill, I can see it now — there’s a ruined croft, there’s another ruined croft, there’s the rubble of a village, there’s another. And that’s when I got it. That before the Clearances, we were not a wilderness, we were full of villages like England up here. I’m dreaming, really, that in the land reform it should say every little shieling [tiny hamlet] should be repopulated, with futuristic little villages with solar panels."

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Gladiatrix
December 16th, 2015
12:12 PM
If the SNP actually thinks that the European Court of Human Rights will agree to people being told what they can and can't do with their own land, or being taxed at punitive rates merely because of who they are then the SNP is delusional. Any attempt to bring in laws like those proposed wouldn't last 5 minutes, will result in an enormous damages claim and huge public expense in sorting out the legal mess. Proof positive were it required that Sturgeon, Salmond et al are unfit to hold public office.

Gladiatrix
December 15th, 2015
10:12 PM
If the SNP thinks that the ECHR will let them indulge in mass land theft they are delusional. This talk of deciding who can own land and who can inherit only with permission of the SNP, is not only pointless it is clearly unlawful. If the SNP persist the current landowners should prosecute them for misfeasance in public office, and sue for massive compensation.

Anonymous
November 29th, 2015
8:11 AM
Very good article. Land reform coming.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
More Dispatches
Popular Standpoint topics