You are here:   Features > ONLINE ONLY: Arguing About Amis
 

In The Second Plane Amis wrote that the age of terror will also be remembered as the "age of boredom". Amis is the author of some of the sharpest words yet written about Islamism's challenge to the West. But his fiction speaks to what is sacred in the secular world: the imaginative play of a talented mind. It's unsettling that when faced with real talent, so many people who write about literature choose to be boring about it when they're fortunate enough to be under no obligation to be so. But as Amis wrote of the reaction against Larkin: "In a sense, none of this matters, because only the poems matter." Only the literature matters, and this is great literature:

I felt the baby's fear when I entered. A sudden pall of mid-afternoon, and silence, and no Keith and no Kath: just Kim, the squirming bagel at my feet on the kitchen floor. She seemed unhurt, only soaked and crying — and afraid. And that was enough, too much, should never happen. Oh I know when the babies come how we patter and creep like mice through the dark tunnels, to tend them, anticipate them, to pick them up and give them comfort. But it must be like that. It must always be like that. Because when we're not there, their worlds begin to fall away. On every side the horizon climbs until it pushes out the sky. The walls come in. Pain they can take, maybe. Pain is close and they know where it comes from. Not fear, though. Keep them from fear. Jesus, if they only knew what was out there. And that's why they must never be left alone like this.

— London Fields

Cities at night, I feel, contain men who cry in their sleep and then say Nothing. It's nothing. Just sad dreams. Or something like that ... Swing low in your weep ship, with your tear scans and your sob probes, and you would mark them. Women — and they can be wives, lovers, gaunt muses, fat nurses, obsessions, devourers, exes, nemeses — will wake and turn to these men and ask, with female need-to-know, "What is it?" And the men say, "Nothing. No it isn't anything really. Just sad dreams."

— The Information

She had been unconscious for over a hundred hours, and he told his mother and brother that there was no point in coming, she would not be waking up and there was no point in coming, coming from Andalucia, from Sierra Leone ... It was nearly midnight. Her body was flat, sunken, on the raised bed, all buoyancy gone; but the lifeline on the monitor continued to undulate, like a childish representation of the ocean, and she continued to breathe — to breathe with preternatural force.

Yes Violet looked forceful. For the first time in her life, she seemed to be someone it would be foolish to treat lightly or underestimate, ridge-faced, totemic, like a squaw queen with orange hair.

"She's gone," said the doctor and pointed with her hand.

The wavering line had levelled out. "She's still breathing," said Keith. But of course it was the machine that was still breathing. He stood over a breathless corpse, the chest filling, heaving, and he thought of her running and running, flying over the fields.

— The Pregnant Widow

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Protoplasmtango
May 3rd, 2011
12:05 PM
It became impossible to take M Amis seriously after the dead weight of Einstein's Monsters and London Fields. Largely because the words 'the weather's been strange lately' became a private joke between me and my partner. The Author as Amateur Meteorologist is a bit silly.

nerl l johnson
April 29th, 2011
3:04 AM
Yes you lose marks for the dead bores repetitions but a nice bit of work nevertheless; staunch support for good old Martin: a man who tells it like he thinks it is.

Adrian Michael Kelly
April 27th, 2011
4:04 PM
What crude and condescending thinking: Amis on the one hand, "dead bores" on the other. Come *on*. I am a longtime admirer and advocate of Amis's work, including Yellow Dog, The Information, and The Second Plane, but apart from its occasionally funny set pieces and sporadic brilliance-flashes, The Pregnant Widow was *shockingly*--and sadly--inept and unfunny. I hope I am wrong in seeing in that cobbled, motley assemblage the signs of talent-death that Amis saw in late Nabokov.

Anonymous
April 27th, 2011
4:04 PM
Who the hell is Katie Price?

M Gunnison
April 27th, 2011
12:04 AM
Welcome to America, Mr. Amis. We are very glad to have you.

Robert Speirs
April 26th, 2011
3:04 PM
It is "literature" like this that keeps me to my resolution of never reading any fiction written after the year 1900.

kristof
April 26th, 2011
2:04 PM
i see that good old english pomposity has disposed of another solid citizen. some of these posts reek of left wing bile. sad really and its why england no longer rates. even in australia.

Don Kenner
April 26th, 2011
12:04 PM
First Niall Ferguson and now Martin Amis? Good news for America! You can keep that irrelevant Marxist Nancy-boy Terry Eagleton and that talentless bore A. N. Wilson (which religion is Wilson this week? Muslim?). I just read that London is the hub of Al-Qaeda's global terror network. You know, the one that Eagleton and Wilson want you to ignore. Good luck with that.

Sean Matthews
April 26th, 2011
8:04 AM
Amis is an interesting case, but also, indisputably, a not very attractive human being. I remember reading Money and finding it very funny; later I read it again and thought it was clever but misanthropically nasty. I suspect that the later is probably more in line with posterity. A way a with words isn't quite enough. Larkin will have no problems with posterity. Amis will (as will Clive James and Paul Berman for that matter).

Nicholas Liu
April 26th, 2011
3:04 AM
An odd attitude to take. Sure, "only the literature matters"--when we're discussing the literature. When we discuss Amis the man, that privilege falls away. Literature, even (or especially) great literature, stands apart from the people who create it. It isn't a shield. Anyway, it was good of you to admit that "You can't describe real literary talent either", though it might have been more honest to say "I can't describe real literary talent". It's strange how a defense predicated entirely on the claim that Amis is simply too great a writer to be criticised fails entirely to make a case for his greatness. Calling his critics "dead bores" over and over and over again does not a case make, though it does serve as an instructive lesson in unintended irony. Perhaps you'll say that no such case can be made, that all one can do is point and say "Here stands a great writer"--but why, then, should this essay exist? If you really believe that an argument for a writer's literary merit can't be articulated, take Wittgenstein's advice and remain silent.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.