You are here:   Christianity > Jews, Christians and Judaeo-Christians
 

 
Tensions in the Temple: "Expulsion of the money-changers" by Giotto, c.1304 

The combined expression "Jewish Christian", made up of two seemingly contradictory concepts, must strike readers not specially trained in theology or religious history as an oxymoron. For how can someone simultaneously be a follower of both Moses and Jesus? Yet at the beginning of the Christian movement, in the first hundred years of the post-Jesus era, encounters with Jewish Christians distinguishable from Gentile Christians were a daily occurrence both in the Holy Land and in the diaspora. 

To understand the genesis of these notions, the first point to note is that during his days of preaching, Jesus of Nazareth addressed only Jews, "the lost sheep of Israel" (Mt 10:5; 15:24). His disciples were even expressly instructed not to approach Gentiles or Samaritans (Mt 10:5). On the few occasions that Jesus ventured beyond the boundaries of his homeland, he never proclaimed his gospel to pagans, nor did his disciples do so during his lifetime. The mission of the 11 apostles to "all the nations" (Mt 28:19) is a "post-Resurrection" idea. It appears to be of Pauline inspiration and is nowhere found in the Gospels apart from the spurious longer ending of Mark (Mk 16:15), which is missing from all the older manuscripts. Jesus's own perspective was exclusively Jewish; he was concerned only with Jews. 

Indeed, we learn from the Acts of the Apostles that the primitive community of Jesus followers consisted of 120 Jewish persons, including the 11 apostles and the mother and brothers of Jesus (Acts 1:14-5). This is incidentally the last reference to Mary in the New Testament, although there are further allusions to the male siblings of Jesus in the Acts and in Paul. James, "the brother of the Lord" as Paul refers to him, is presented as the leader of the Jerusalem church (Acts 15:19; Gal 1:19) and according to another Pauline passage, the married brothers of Jesus also acted as missionaries of the Gospel (1 Cor 9:5). 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Steven
November 25th, 2011
11:11 PM
The article is genuine Vermes scholarship. The Greek's handling of the Christian faith was amazing. Rested minds took the material and made it into magic. Ideas of Judaism were hijacked. The Jews had many good options, to remain just old-fashioned Jews was the incorrect choice, which led to great sufferings. Can we try to be really creative after the 2000 years delay?

Chris
November 25th, 2011
5:11 PM
"Jesus is never called the "Son of God"." True, but he is called 'son' with God being called father in Did 7:1, 7:3, 9:2 & 9:3. "Jesus shares this designation in relation to God with King David... it is clear that it must be rendered as God's "Servant"." Why? Kings of Israel are referred to as God's sons in 2 Samuel 7:14 and Psalm 2:7. "If so, the Didache uses only the lowliest Christological qualification about Jesus." The title of Christ is used in Did 9:2, 9:4 & 12:5. They are claiming he is the Messiah, I wouldn't view this as a lowly qualification.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.