You are here:   Christianity > Jews, Christians and Judaeo-Christians
 

The Cornelius episode (Acts 10), in which the Pentecost-like ecstasy affecting the Roman centurion and his entourage persuaded the astonished Peter to baptise them without further ado, seems to have been an exceptional event; no further conversion of a Gentile is recorded in the Holy Land anywhere in the New Testament. 

It was in the Syrian city of Antioch in the late 40s CE that the novelty set in. Emigré members of the Jerusalem church were joined there by Gentiles evangelised and baptised by Judaeo-Christians originating from Cyprus and Cyrene. The mother church of Jerusalem dispatched Barnabas to run the new mixed community, and Barnabas hurried to Tarsus in Cilicia to persuade his friend Saul/Paul, already a believer in Christ, to join him in looking after the new church. The Jewish and the Gentile Christians of Antioch coexisted happily and ate together. When visiting the community, Peter willingly participated in their common meals. However, when some extra-zealous representatives of the Jerusalem church headed by James the brother of Jesus, members of the so-called "circumcision party", arrived in Antioch, their disapproving attitude compelled all the Jewish Christians, including even Peter and Barnabas, but with the notable exception of Paul, to discontinue their table fellowship with the brethren of Greek stock (Acts 11:2). As a result, union, fraternity and harmony in the new mixed church was abolished. The outraged Paul confronted Peter and publicly called him a hypocrite (Gal 2:11-4), creating the first major row in Christendom.   

After Paul's first successful missionary journey to Asia Minor, the entry of pagans into the Jesus fellowship became a particularly acute issue. A council of the apostles, attended by Paul and Barnabas, was convened in Jerusalem, at which James the brother of the Lord, the head of the mother community, overruled the demands of the extremist members of his congregation and proposed a compromise solution (Acts 15:19-21). Gentiles wishing to join the church would be exempted from the full rigour of the Law of Moses, including circumcision, and would merely be required to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from the consumption of blood, from eating non-ritually slaughtered meat, and from certain sex acts judged particularly odious by Jews. 

These rules were necessarily intended for Gentile converts in the diaspora. In Jerusalem different conditions prevailed, for Gentile Christians could not join their Judaeo-Christian co-religionists in the Temple as non-Jews were prohibited under threat of instant death to set foot in the area of the holy precinct reserved for Jews. 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Steve
December 13th, 2011
6:12 PM
Moshe Idel's book "Ben: Sonship and Jewish Mysticism" is a fascinating (if lengthy) discussion of the concept of 'son' in Jewish mysticism, with the New Testament serving as one of point of reference.

Aaron Beach
December 13th, 2011
6:12 PM
John 4 clearly demonstrates Jesus sharing "the gospel" with Samaritans and many believing. The universality of Jesus message is made clear in John 12:32 reflecting prophesies made in Isaiah (every knee shall bow, tongue confess...). Maybe I'm not being inventive enough - but the idea that Paul invented universal salvation or deified Jesus seems interesting but unbiblical.

Charles
December 13th, 2011
4:12 PM
Excuse me, any relatively well-educated person, not only a specialist, knows that Jesus' first followers were Jews and that Gentile Christianity came later.

Jack
December 13th, 2011
3:12 PM
Great article. I just wish that people would accept the truth for a change. Reading this article would be a good start. The idea of the Messiah, for example, implies no divinity. Messiah is just a man based on the Jewish notion. One has to take the Jewish notion since the very idea came from them. Virgin birth: when are we going to accept that this has to do with ignorance about human physiology since "virgin" in the prophecy really means a young girl! What is the number one commandment according to Jesus? It is the Shema! That means only One God and not the Trinity! Not 3 in 1. Only 1. Jesus would be appalled by such nonsense. The faster we accept these simple truths the better and the less idolatry we commit.

Krzysztof Ciuba
December 13th, 2011
1:12 PM
A good article. Like in any science it shine the light on the epistemology of creation of an axiomatic system of knowledge, here, Christianity ( a system's beliefs). True, the historical Jesus considered himself only as a the Son of Man (read even, Benedict xvi, Jesus from Nazareth, ch. on Jesus's titles). Nicene's Creed is the language of...mataphor; that Fathers did not know the subtelity of St.Thomas 'definition" of God (as not an Greek or other religions intuition as the "best of best of....") or syntactical@semantical meanings of such terms like: being, relation, God, Father, Son, and of course the historical person of Jesus from Nazareth, who after conversion (Mk 1:4,9+Stories of BAptism)) started his mission. The title "Son of God" has a meaning but not of a mythical one of Greek Olimp; but The Son of God is not ...God! (S.Th1,2,3+ 20th cent logic+the hermeneutics of NT: Gr. theos in NT writiongs refer mostly to Father

John Quill
December 13th, 2011
11:12 AM
The author's knowledge of the gospels is very superficial. Jesus indeed made strong statements about being sent to the nation of Israel, but several passages make it very clear that the gospel would go to the Gentiles. Three prominent miracles were for non-Jews (healing the centurions servant, healing the Syro-Phoenician woman with an issue of blood, and exorcising a legion of demons into a herd of swine in the Decapolis). The "woman at the well" was a Samaritan, and she evangelized her city. Some of the parables are clearly indicative of Gentile inclusion (tenants, wedding feast) as are prophecies (Abraham, dreams in Daniel, Isaiah 9). We also have clear indications at his birth (blessing of Simeon in Luke 2, visit by the wise men) that Jesus was Lord of all. However, if you don't believe me, then believe Jesus' last instruction to his disciples in Acts 1:8: "But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth." In short, the church had to start someplace, and the chosen nation of Israel was it. However, the gospel went to the Gentiles rapidly because God has chosen his own from every nation - it was certainly no accident.

Almagor
December 6th, 2011
8:12 AM
It is a sin and a shame that there came to be hostility between the the Christian Jews or the Jewish Christians and the gentile Christians. Jesus never said one negative thing about the religion that God gave to Moses and never said anyone should leave that religion. Christians, later had a lot of hostility against the people who practiced the religion that God gave to Moses because of ignorance of the Bible and ignorance of the meaning of the word Jew. In Jesus day a Jew was a resident of Judea instead of Samaria or the Galilee region. When there are negative things about the Jews said in the Gospels the word can not mean those who practiced the religion that God gave Moses because Jesus was a devout practitioner of that religion and in fact, was a Rabbi. But Gentiles later didn't know that a Jew was a resident of Judea and blamed them for killing Jesus which is ridiculous. God sent Jesus to Earth to teach us about The Father and to be crucified. Since Jesus was crucified to pay for our sins, all of us are responsible for Jesus Crucifixion.

Paddy
December 3rd, 2011
8:12 PM
A most interesting article regarding the early church. Thank you. It is interesting how definitions can change. In modern times (by my unstudied observation), the term Judeo-Christian is popularly used as a propaganda term for those who wish to emphasise the "sameness" between the Jews and the Christians in reference to the Muslims. The reality is that there is much in common between all three religions.

Anonymous
December 1st, 2011
3:12 PM
Jesus most certainly is called the Son of God. Matthew 3:17.

elixelx
December 1st, 2011
7:12 AM
Judge not lest ye be judged; Let he who is without sin cast the first stone: The Gospels. Be deliberate in Judgement! Pirke Aboth. Would the author care to tell us how those two BASIC, FUNDAMENTAL tenets are to be resolved? If you want to enter the kingdom of Heaven give your wealth to the`poor and come follow me... In (Genesis 28:22), Abraham's grandson Jacob also made a commitment to give God back a tenth of his increase if God would fulfill certain conditions like God would be with him and will watch over him on this journey Jacob was taking and would give him food to eat and clothes to wear, so that I return safely to my father’s household (Genesis 28:20-22). Would the author care to explain and resolve the Mitzva of tithing and how having money and increase of riches DISQUALIFIED one from the Kingdom of Heaven? I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. And what does the LORD require of you But to do justly, To love mercy, And to walk humbly with your God?" (NKJV) Would the author care to explain why one group has dirct communication with the Almighty while the other requires an intermediary? Finally, why did the early Christans reject the Oral Law and its practitioners, the Pharisees and come to see these as hypocrites and finally enemies? How did it happen that Jew-haters came to dominate the power of the Church?

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.