You are here:   Catholics > Doctrine, dialogue and truth
 
Paul — himself a Jew, a Roman citizen, and the apostle of the Gentiles — implies that the distinction between Jew and non-Jew will disappear at the end of time — but not before. "I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin . . . For if the casting away of them [Israel] be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?" The Jews, in the New Testament, are still God's means to save all mankind — just as they always were in the Hebrew Bible. The Jewish rejection of the Gospel has not altered their providential function, nor their prospect of redemption.

In grappling with this Pauline doctrine, two great German-speaking Jesuit theologians, Karl Rahner and Hans Urs von Balthasar, have contributed important but contrasting ideas. To Rahner we owe the idea of the "anonymous Christian", the person outside the Church who by God's grace attains salvation through following the dictates of his conscience. As we have seen, the Second Vatican Council implicitly adopted this idea of "inclusivism", stating in Gaudium et Spes that "the Holy Spirit in a manner known only to God offers to every man the possibility of being associated with this paschal mystery". Balthasar, however, is sceptical about what he calls "a superficial ecumenism". He rejects the notion of "an invisible church which would be the true Catholic church permeating all confessions, and a visible church which is just one of many variants of being Christian". However, for Balthasar even those who have turned away from God are not wholly beyond hope — because Christ has been there before them, having descended into hell after his crucifixion. "Even what we call ‘hell' is, although it is the place of desolation, always still a Christological place." Balthasar spent many years in dialogue with the great Jewish sage Martin Buber, and his struggle to make sense of the Epistle to the Romans influenced his entire theology of history. God's mercy, Paul tells us, embraces the whole Jewish people, not just the "remnant" who converted to Christianity. And this insuperable fact of the universality of God's mercy led Balthasar towards his most controversial teaching: that humanity as a whole, Jews and Gentiles, will ultimately be saved — that hell, in other words, is empty.

This doctrine of universal salvation finds resistance in Western Christianity, with its emphasis on free will and responsibility, but the hope that all shall be saved is an old one, expressed by the Greek Orthodox concept of apokatastasis, the eschatological "restitution" of all things. This is close to the Jewish notion of tikkun olam, or "healing the world". Rahner's doctrine of the anonymous Christian and Balthasar's doctrine of universal salvation offer contrasting but compatible solutions to the problem with which we began: the problem of truth.

Each of the last three popes has had Jewish interlocutors and friends among the rabbinate, but none has been closer than the relationship between Pope Francis and Rabbi Abraham Skorka. Francis, according to Skorka, "feels us [Jews] to be at the root of his belief". The two Argentines have found enough common spiritual ground to be able to live with the competing truth claims of their respective religions. Each of them, the Jesuit and the Jew, is confident that they are on the same side. Doctrinal orthodoxy matters, for without it neither would be sure enough of his own ground to be able to step onto the other's. But doctrine is not all that matters. There is a truth that respects and transcends doctrinal differences, the truth that Paul sought to articulate in his paean of praise to the Jewish people in Romans 9:4: "To them pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises . . ." No Christian ought ever to speak to or about Jews without such respect, never forgetting that Jesus was Jewish not only in flesh and blood but in his teaching. The imitation of Christ is therefore, in some unfathomable but deeply significant sense, the act of drawing closer to and identifying with the Jewish people.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Sergei Bourachaga
December 3rd, 2014
11:12 AM
At the end of his three-day visit to Turkey Pope Francis urged Muslim leaders worldwide to condemn in an unambiguous language the barbaric violence committed by Islamic radicals (ISIS) against innocent civilians. In reply, Turkish president Erdogan expressed an explicit contempt of the West by linking directly Islamic Terrorism on growing anti-Muslim sentiments in Europe and America, and the growing Western conspiracies to dominate the Middle East. Erdogan insisted during Pope Francis’ visit to Istanbul that there was a “very serious and rapid trend of growth in racism, discrimination, and hatred of others (Muslims), especially Islamophobia in the West.” Let us analyze closely the following verses from The Koran and see who hates the “OTHERS” more, the West or Islam: “Know that we send down to the unbelievers (Jews and Christians) Devils who incite them to evil. Therefore have patience: their days are numbered.” Koran 19:87 This verse is often chanted during the beheading rituals we often see on radical Islamic websites. For the pious Muslim beheading his defenseless hostage, it is an act of heroic proportion, because he is slaughtering the Devil incarnated in the human form of an Infidel. “Satan has gained possession of The People of The Book (Jews and Christians) and caused them to forget Allah’s warnings. They are the confederates of Satan; Satan’s confederates shall assuredly be lost in hell. The Believers are the confederates of Allah (Hizbollah); and Allah’s confederates shall surely triumph.” Koran 58:19 Another verse recited frequently in the background of beheading rituals, to reinforce the view that by slaughtering Christians and Jews, a pious Muslim is killing Satan not an innocent captive. “We will put terror into the hearts of the unbelievers (Jews and Christians). They serve other Gods for whom no sanction has been revealed. Hell shall be their home; dismal indeed is the dwelling place of the evil-doers.” Koran 3:149 A verse often used by Salafist radicals to spread terror and encourage Muslims to kill indiscriminately innocent children, women, and seniors attending a wedding or using the public transit system. After all Jews and Christians worship Gods that have not been sanctioned by the Allah of Islam, and they are all classified as evil-doers who shall perish in an earthly hell of Muslim design, make, and timing. “Do you fear the unbelievers (Jews and Christians)? Surely Allah is more worthy of your fear. If you are true believers make war on them; Allah will chastise them through you and humble them. He will grant you victory over them and heal the spirit of the faithful.” Koran 9:14 A favorite passage of Hizbollah fighters in Lebanon, who scored with the help of Allah a “Divine Victory” against the mightiest army in The Middle East (IDF 2006). Hassan Nasrallah, the supreme leader of The Hizbollah movement in Lebanon exploits this passage extensively in his fiery speeches to remind his followers that Allah’s will for the believer is very clear; his or her primary religious duty should be to wage war on the Jewish State of Israel to liberate Jerusalem, destroy Christian unbelievers who sustain the existence of Israel, and thus impose on the “Kouffar” Allah’s agenda for the salvation of humanity. “Cast into hell every hardened unbeliever, every opponent from the people of the book (Jews and Christians), and every doubting transgressor who has set up another God besides Allah. Hurl him into the fierce tormenting flames of hell.” Koran 50:21 Suicide bombers use this verse (in videos taped prior to their heroic operations) to justify the blowing up of their explosive charges on buses and in a variety of public places frequented by Jews and Christians. By becoming a “Shahid” (Arabic for martyr) and securing a place in Allah’s heavenly kingdom, the suicide bomber is hurling his victims (hardened unbelievers) into the fierce tormenting flames of hell-the inferno created by the explosion in a confined space. Believers, do not make friends with any men other than your own people. They will spare no pains to corrupt you. They desire nothing but your ruin. Their hatred is clear from what they say, but more violent is the hatred which their breasts conceal.” Koran 3:117 These verses are used extensively every Friday, in dozens of mosques located in major capitals such as London, Paris, Brussels, Spain, Toronto…to deepen the schism between Muslims and non-believers, and insulate them from any arguments that may challenge radical Islamist narratives. The time has come to reinforce the key principle that no democracy has any legal or moral obligation to tolerate the intolerable, including Muslim presidents like Erdogan. And to all Western apologists who believe that tolerance should remain one of the most distinct characteristics of democracies, I invite them to reflect on the following statement of British novelist Dorothy Sayers: “In this world it is called Tolerance, but in hell it is called indifference, the sin that believes in nothing, cares for nothing, seeks to know nothing, interferes with nothing, enjoys nothing, hates nothing, finds purpose in nothing, lives for nothing, and remains alive because there is nothing for which it will die.” Sergei Bourachaga

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.