You are here:   Birmingham City Council > The Great Betrayal: How Liberals Appease Islam
 
Much the same is about to happen to charities. Journalists have investigated Islamic "charities" funnelling money to terrorist groups many times. The "third sector" has never treated their reports seriously and asked why the supporters and enablers of violence should have tax relief. In its little world, one did not raise such matters. Once again, and almost from nowhere, official patience has snapped. The Charity Commission is demanding new powers and describes Islamic extremism as "potentially the most deadly" problem it faces. The freedom of the great and the good to do good works is about to be constrained because they were neither great nor good enough to fight the vicious men in their midst — or even acknowledge their existence.

The new restrictions on schools and charities are as nothing when set against the astonishingly authoritarian attack on civil liberties that is heading towards us. Theresa May is proposing to threaten schools and universities with legal action if they fail to address child radicalisation or ban extremists from preaching on campus,  to relocate terror suspects around the country, and prevent insurers from funding ransom payments to terrorist groups.

The government has said it wants to go further and impose "Extremism Disruption Orders" once it can secure a parliamentary majority. They would allow judges to ban people deemed extremists from broadcasting, protesting or even posting messages on Facebook or Twitter without official permission. George Osborne says he wants to "eliminate extremism in all its forms". The police will not just arrest those who call for murder, as they have always done, but people who "spread hate but do not break laws".

True liberals always held that people should be free to speak their minds as long as they did not incite violence. Now the Home Office wants laws that will force us to be nice citizens, who never say anything the thin-skinned might consider "hateful" or "inappropriate". Secularists fear that atheists will be locked up for being beastly about religion. Christians fear that evangelicals will be jailed for being beastly about gays. We will live in a country where we cannot utter a controversial opinion.

Outrageous! Grotesque! Intolerable! I can condemn the government all day and all night. But I can see why it is calling in the cops.

According to my colleague Shiraz Maher, there are now more British Muslims fighting for Islamic State than serving in the British Army. According to the government's Prevent programme, more than 30 per cent of people convicted for al-Qaeda-associated terrorist offences in the UK between 1999 and 2009 attended university or a higher education institution. And according to every police officer and Home Office minister you hear, the security services worry themselves sick about the body count when the men of Islamic State return, filled with hatred of the West, of Jews, of gays — of everyone and everything their fascistic ideology denounces.

One product of our multicultural society who concerns them is Nasser Muthana. He may or may not have hacked off the heads of Islamic State captives and posted videos online celebrating the atrocity. He certainly boasted on Twitter: "Kafir [non-believers] are afraid we will slaughter Yazidis, our deen [religious path] is clear we will kill their men, take their women and children as slaves insha'Allah."

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Bob-B
December 18th, 2014
8:12 AM
An excellent piece. I hope it will change at least a few minds on the Left.

amcdonald
December 18th, 2014
6:12 AM
All very true, Mr Cohen. We are indeed very far away from voting like the people of Uruguay. Who the hell wants to live in a green, prospering, cultured, musical, bohemian country ? "Liberal England in it`s decadence"- it`s dreary, mean spirited neo-Victorianism more like ! How come Russell Brand and Nick Cohen (and the political parties) never mention Uruguay ? No muslims ever will either. The fun,career choice offered by Islamic State in jihad-porn production is a temptation the dumbfuck scum of the earth cannot resist. It`s heartening to read Douglas Murray,Nick Cohen and Julie Burchill`s enlightening articles on Israel and the enemy totalitarian islam. `Wordy` literary types ignore the young female artists of this century- but that`s a different subject and one Standpoint could make a new year resolution to highlight.

Mark Lambert
December 17th, 2014
9:12 PM
I've taken a growing interest in all this for a few years now, and with the growing interest comes growing concern. Concern about who the media use to represent Muslim views. Concern about university Islamic Societies inviting the types of speakers, along with the demands for segregated seating. Concern for the ridiculous blow-up against Majid Nawaz for posting the Jesus & Mo picture with a tagline of, "this doesn't offend me." I've left out the obvious terror-threat. So I might post stuff on Facebook, either to get frustrations off my chest, or in some cases, let others know what is going on - a case in point was the Nawaz cartoon debacle that didn't hit mainstream news for at least two and a half weeks. I might post an article (like this one), with a tagline of my own thoughts, many times pointing out the "problem" we all have with things like this, is a problem for liberal Muslims too. Hardly any "friends" (and I do know them all) respond to these posts, but in proper communication, I did get this: A Jewish friend said I should be careful, and he may be right. He's concerned about the "traditional" far-right rise (mentioning UKIP a lot), a bit more so than what I'd call an Islamist far-right rise. But he gets my point, but would never reply on Facebook - fair enough, he has international work colleagues as friends there. A cousin said, "you seem to have a downer on Muslims." After my heavy sigh and words of, "I'm sure I've explained what it is I'm absolutely concerned about," she said she agreed, and we had a long conversation in agreement. So I was stumped as to her first point, and then wondered how everything might be coming across to other friends and family. Was I explaining myself enough? Did they actually read the articles (probably not). Did they think, after giving a cursory glance, that I'd turned into an EDL/BNP type? Did they have the same concerns, or were they ignorant, or even didn't care? Or were they scared to reply? Ok, I do know a few are just concerned about sharing pics of fluffy cats, but I expect nothing of any substance from them politically. It's difficult to navigate this with accusations of "Isamophobia" and even "racism" after certain people have managed to marry-up the two words. Because I am interested, I know Muslims can be called "Islamophobes" for a challenge on the conservative orthodoxy. I doubt many of my Facebook friends know this, and I find this frustrating and annoying. I find I have to convince myself that I'm correct to be concerned and if anyone gets the wrong idea, I can easily explain myself, and it's worth carrying on being concerned and being interested.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.