You are here:   Birmingham City Council > The Great Betrayal: How Liberals Appease Islam
 
Liberal England in its decadence is more likely to turn on the enemies of repellent religion than the creed itself. The University of West London's censorship was hardly a one-off. The authorities at the London School of Economics punished atheist students for wearing T-shirts with a cartoon of Jesus saying "hey" and Muhammad saying "How ya doin'?", taken from the online "Jesus and Mo" strip. The sight of a cartoon image of Muhammad was too much for the university to bear. The LSE students union egged the administrators on, and passed a motion saying that it was "racist" to fear Islamic culture, even if that culture included variants of sharia law that mandate unequal treatment for women, Christians and Jews.

So deep has the rot set in that the National Union of Students decided that it was "Islamophobic" to support the Kurds fighting Islamic State, even though most Kurds are Muslims (although, admittedly, some are Christian and some — shockingly for the British Left — don't believe in a god or gods at all).

One can see in the universities and outside a left-wing version of radical Islam developing. Or if that is too strong, a culture which behaves as if it were controlled by radical Islamists. Like our supposedly alternative comedians, the middle-class left will satirise Christianity, as any Islamist would. Like the newspapers and television stations, it will not allow any satire of Islam even if the satire is as toothless as a cartoon of Jesus saying "Hey" and Muhammad saying "How ya doin'?" It will ignore the crimes against humanity of Islamic State while condemning every Israeli crime. For all its supposed feminism, it will behave as any Islamist would, and allow religious speakers to segregate audiences with men at the front and the seductive women who might drive them from the path of purity at the back.

As with the schools, it was easy to think that the dominant left-wing culture would take decades to shift. As with the schools, those who thought that their little world would never change failed to see themselves as others saw them. The state, and the rest of society, could see the hypocrisy and the dangers of giving extremism a ride so easy extremists did not even need to argue their case.

Last year, in the first sign of new times coming, Labour and Conservative politicians slapped down Universities UK, the quango that represents all institutions of higher education. It had ruled, without a blush, that it was a breach of an Islamist cleric's human rights to deny him the power to segregate women at public meetings. This year, as young British men flood overseas to commit crimes against humanity, the state has gone much further, and already you see institutions scrambling to fall in behind the new party line. Last month, a London university banned an Islamist speaker, who had blamed "Western culture" for allowing "obscene, filthy, and shameless" homosexual impulses. On the same day, the Law Society withdrew its staggeringly sexist guidance that solicitors must tell their Muslim clients that women should receive only half as much as men in sharia-compliant wills.

I am sure the government has overwhelming public support, but fear that an oppressive culture imposed from above is no substitute for a genuine anti-fascist culture bubbling up from below. But then I must face the fact that there is a vast woozy mass of liberal-leftists who will never change, and would not fight back even if a bomb exploded in their own back yard.

I will oppose the state's attempts to restrict freedom of speech, as I hope you will too. But I will not let supposed liberals forget that, by their own cowardice and lack of conviction, they have brought this dismal moment on themselves.
 
 
View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Bob-B
December 18th, 2014
8:12 AM
An excellent piece. I hope it will change at least a few minds on the Left.

amcdonald
December 18th, 2014
6:12 AM
All very true, Mr Cohen. We are indeed very far away from voting like the people of Uruguay. Who the hell wants to live in a green, prospering, cultured, musical, bohemian country ? "Liberal England in it`s decadence"- it`s dreary, mean spirited neo-Victorianism more like ! How come Russell Brand and Nick Cohen (and the political parties) never mention Uruguay ? No muslims ever will either. The fun,career choice offered by Islamic State in jihad-porn production is a temptation the dumbfuck scum of the earth cannot resist. It`s heartening to read Douglas Murray,Nick Cohen and Julie Burchill`s enlightening articles on Israel and the enemy totalitarian islam. `Wordy` literary types ignore the young female artists of this century- but that`s a different subject and one Standpoint could make a new year resolution to highlight.

Mark Lambert
December 17th, 2014
9:12 PM
I've taken a growing interest in all this for a few years now, and with the growing interest comes growing concern. Concern about who the media use to represent Muslim views. Concern about university Islamic Societies inviting the types of speakers, along with the demands for segregated seating. Concern for the ridiculous blow-up against Majid Nawaz for posting the Jesus & Mo picture with a tagline of, "this doesn't offend me." I've left out the obvious terror-threat. So I might post stuff on Facebook, either to get frustrations off my chest, or in some cases, let others know what is going on - a case in point was the Nawaz cartoon debacle that didn't hit mainstream news for at least two and a half weeks. I might post an article (like this one), with a tagline of my own thoughts, many times pointing out the "problem" we all have with things like this, is a problem for liberal Muslims too. Hardly any "friends" (and I do know them all) respond to these posts, but in proper communication, I did get this: A Jewish friend said I should be careful, and he may be right. He's concerned about the "traditional" far-right rise (mentioning UKIP a lot), a bit more so than what I'd call an Islamist far-right rise. But he gets my point, but would never reply on Facebook - fair enough, he has international work colleagues as friends there. A cousin said, "you seem to have a downer on Muslims." After my heavy sigh and words of, "I'm sure I've explained what it is I'm absolutely concerned about," she said she agreed, and we had a long conversation in agreement. So I was stumped as to her first point, and then wondered how everything might be coming across to other friends and family. Was I explaining myself enough? Did they actually read the articles (probably not). Did they think, after giving a cursory glance, that I'd turned into an EDL/BNP type? Did they have the same concerns, or were they ignorant, or even didn't care? Or were they scared to reply? Ok, I do know a few are just concerned about sharing pics of fluffy cats, but I expect nothing of any substance from them politically. It's difficult to navigate this with accusations of "Isamophobia" and even "racism" after certain people have managed to marry-up the two words. Because I am interested, I know Muslims can be called "Islamophobes" for a challenge on the conservative orthodoxy. I doubt many of my Facebook friends know this, and I find this frustrating and annoying. I find I have to convince myself that I'm correct to be concerned and if anyone gets the wrong idea, I can easily explain myself, and it's worth carrying on being concerned and being interested.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.