You are here:   America > The Penalty that Degrades America
 

According to Bolin the death penalty perpetuates a view of inmates as monsters beyond redemption or rehabilitation and has no place in a civilised society. "This grotesque system of ours is about stamping out irritants, similar to how you would a spider. It has nothing to do with so-called justice. It is barbaric revenge."

Such is Bolin's disgust with the death penalty that she walked out on her lawyer husband and four daughters and in 1996 married one of her clients, Oscar Bolin, a convicted killer and rapist, who had been on death row for five years. Their marriage was broadcast on national TV, she in a lace wedding dress, he on speakerphone behind bars. 

She is on record as saying it was meant to be a statement of "great personal sacrifice" that would draw attention to what she thought was a terrible injustice. It was never an infatuation: "People thought the wrong thing." The marriage never accomplished what she had hoped and has overshadowed her subsequent mitigation work. I have the feeling that Bolin, who spent years trying to prove her husband's innocence, regrets her grand gesture. 

Starke, near Jacksonville, has a population of less than 6,000. The vast majority is Southern Baptist, and most adults keep a licensed gun at home to protect them against intruders. At the Starke Rotary Club the members say grace and swear allegiance to the American flag before tucking into baked ham, corn bread and sweet iced tea. Mike, like the majority of Starke residents, has worked in the Floridian prison system. He was an engineer who helped maintain the electric chair, known in Florida as "Old Sparky". He tells me how he had tears in his eyes the first time he saw a death row prisoner prepare for execution. "But then the guard took me to one side and told me he had raped a little girl in front of her mamma and then filleted her like a fish," says Mike. "From that day on I felt nothing for them."

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Emmet
August 1st, 2012
3:08 PM
The only facts you can take from this article are that the vast majority of people in the USA support the death penalty, especially those who have been the victim of crime. Justice should be swift however, with all appeals cleared within a year of the conviction.

Anonymous
July 5th, 2012
4:07 PM
Murdering another human being requires the strongest possible punishment. In any just system of law it requires that the murderer's own life be forfeit.

BeadyEye
July 3rd, 2012
9:07 PM
Police chiefs are just another species of politician, and should never be presumed to speak for rank-and-file cops.

BeadyEye
July 3rd, 2012
9:07 PM
It is disingenuous to erect every sort of barrier to implementation, and then complain that implementation is too expensive.

Rose P
July 3rd, 2012
6:07 PM
I agree with Ms. Bindel that the death penalty is wrong for many reasons. I have for a long time thought that we should abolish the death penalty and replace it with life imprisonment without the possibility of parole but with the possibility of assisted suicide.

BlueStrikes
July 3rd, 2012
4:07 PM
PresidentD, just because the constitution recognises it does not make it right - at the end of the day, the U.S. Constitution is just a piece of paper, as are human rights conventions. And a piece of paper, no matter how fancy, cannot determine the morality of the death penalty. Ms. Bindel is not taking issue with the legal aspect of the death penalty; she objects against the morality of it. Therefore, it is incorrect to rebut her using the constitution. Her reference to human rights conventions is founded on the implicit assumption that those conventions are an accurate depiction of actual morality. Whether this is the case or not may be debated. Indeed, reconsidering this article, Ms. Bindel does not focus on moral arguments against the death penalty but rather focuses on practical considerations: efficiency and effectiveness. These are issues that should be responded to, not dismissed with a handwaved 'specious arguments'.

PresidentD
June 27th, 2012
10:06 PM
Ms. Bindel, we've heard all of your specious arguments against the death penalty countless times before. And no, it does not "contravene every human rights convention", whatever that means. The U.S. Constitution is the highest law America recognizes, and it permits the death penalty. The handwringing clowns at the U.N., Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch can take a hike.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.