You are here:   Antony Gormley > Is The West's Loss Of Faith Terminal?
 
There is, for instance, that question which Ernst Wolfgang Böckenförde posed in the 1960s: “Does the free, secularised state exist on the basis of normative presuppositions that it itself cannot guarantee?” It is rare to hear this question even raised in our societies. Perhaps we sense the answer is “yes” but we do not know what to do if this is the case.

But in fact the wind of opinion in recent years appears to have begun to blow against those who insist that Western liberal societies owe nothing to the religion from which they arose. Partly because the more we become acquainted with other traditions, the harder it becomes to sustain. Indeed, although some people still hold out, it should be evident by now that the culture of human rights has more to do with the creed preached by Moses and Jesus of Nazareth than that of, say, Muhammad. Nevertheless, the question of whether this societal position is sustainable without reference to the beliefs that gave it birth remains deeply pregnant and troubling in the West.

Perhaps we also do not ask these deeper questions not only because we do not believe the answers we used to give but because we sense that we are in some sense in an interim period of our development and that our answers may be about to change. A recent survey by Pew showed that affiliation to Christianity is falling away in Britain faster than in almost any other country. By 2050, the Pew projection suggests, religious affiliation to Christianity will have fallen by a third in the UK from almost two thirds in 2010 and will thus become a minority affiliation for the first time. By the same date, Pew says, Britain will have the third largest Muslim population in Europe, higher than France, Germany or Belgium. All such predictions are of course rife with possible variations. For instance, they assume that Christians will continue to become non-religious while Muslims will not. Which may be the case or may not. In any case, these are movements — like those across Europe and America (where Muslims will by the same date outnumber Jews among the US population) — which cannot fail to have significant repercussions.

Whatever the reasons, it is striking that addressing or even acknowledging questions of meaning has become so uncommon. Despite the unparalleled opportunity, our mass media and multimedia use their power almost solely to purvey distraction and gossip. Meanwhile, the highest ends of our culture say — at best — that the world is complex and that we must simply embrace the complexity and not look for answers. Yet avoiding this discussion is, in the long term, likely to prove a terrible mistake. We live in an age of extraordinary prosperity, but it might not always be like this. Even today, when the sun of economic advantage still shines upon us, there are people who notice a gap in our culture and are finding their own ways to fill it.

For some years now I have been especially struck by accounts I have heard and read of people who have chosen to convert to Islam. Partly these stories are striking because they are so similar — and not only to each other. They are almost always some variant of a story nearly any young person could tell. They generally go something like this: “I had reached X age (often the twenties or early thirties) and I was in a nightclub and I was drunk and I just thought, ‘Life must be about more than this’.” Almost nothing else in our culture says, “But of course this is not all.” Instead the voice of our culture just says, “repeat, repeat.” In the absence of such a voice they search, and they discover Islam. The fact that they land on Islam is a story in itself. Why do these young men and women (very often women) not reach out and find Christianity? Partly it is because most branches of mainstream Christianity have lost the confidence to proselytise. Partly it is the trickle-down effect of the fact that Islamic traditions have not yet been so affected by historical criticism and scholarship. (I say “yet” because that scholarship is starting. Many Muslims sense it and they are fighting with all they have to hold it back because they know what it is going to do.)

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Robert Randles
August 27th, 2015
2:08 PM
The Judeo-Christian religion of the Western cultures made a strong distinction betweem Right and Wrong. This provided a strong moral compass on which to base decisions. By adopting Moral Relativism instead we abandon this moral compass. This seems to be the way the Western world is going, and if we fail to do something about it we will be at grave risk of destruction.

Anonymous
July 19th, 2015
9:07 AM
Douglas, you are a spirit, you have a soul (thinker,feeler,chooser)and you live in a body.The problem for you is you've elevated your soul (intellect) and worship it - you've eaten from the tree of the life of knowledge of good and evil in the Garden of Eden. But, like God says that'll never be enough. He created you to live in communion with Him via your Spirit, which is the part of you He indwells. If you live through your Spirit and elevate it above your soul you will be eating from the Tree of Life, (Jesus), which is the way He intended all of us to live by - including Adam and Eve who chose the wrong tree. There were two trees in the Garden. We all get to choose which we will live life by. Why don't you listen to ravizachariasministries - it'll stimulate your thirst for knowledge through Gods spirit, whilst billjohnson ministries will ignite your spirit. You sound as if you need some excuse to believe in God again

amcdonald
June 18th, 2015
12:06 PM
LIETKULTUR The Unrecorded Man in Japan makes a perceptive comment. Zizek`s " We need to create our own leading culture...a higher leading culture that regulates the way in which the subcultures interact...Pussy Riot are all part of the same struggle. If not then we can all just kill ourselves." (Spiegel online international, March 31) In the islamified Middle East are the Kurdish Army and Israeli Army now the military wing of this `leading culture` ? To what extent is it already here mass-media/technologically ? And, for starters, in Zizek`s conception of the Holy Ghost?

The Unrecorded Man
June 5th, 2015
2:06 PM
I live in Japan, which is not a Judeo-Christian nation, yet in many ways the Japanese knock westerners into a cocked hat when it comes to 'western values'. This is why I am not unduly bothered by the question of whether or not western society can survive the demise of the religion that gave rise to its morality. That morality is alive and well in a present-day non-Christian country.

amcdonald
May 26th, 2015
3:05 PM
Zizek is right to propose that the islamist jihad nutters have an inferiority complex. They are scared of western culture.They are scared of western women. Voters faith in the Tory Party has resulted in a tory victory. The Left may now be extinct but there`s no guarantee the Tories are fit for purpose. The Chinese Communist Party are the best `managers` of global capitalism and its culture. The ancient Chinese philosopher Lao-Tzu wrote " the universe is inhumane and treats men and women like sacrificial straw dogs." Politics and religion mimic Nature. Mecca is now a goldmine of property development,sharia shopping malls and hotels. No support or even a mention is given from the Left or Right to the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain. No exit from islam/jihadist ideology is promoted by the Tories or BBC. The Tories have won a battle but not the war. When Zizek states that the 20th century is over he means new intellectual coordinates are needed. Philosophy (philosophising not ideology spouting) in the 21st century will blossom in culture. Anthony Gormley`s sculptures are competent but vacuous. Akiane Kramarik`s paintings,books (and life) remain astonishing and eternal. And totally independent of whatever meaning or meaninglessness the global artmarket sells. The Cob Gallery,London now has works by Sarah Maple,Stella Vine and Miriam Elia (and orgy prints and cups by Fee). All signs of the advance of a lively english culture by exceptionally talented individuals. And it`s all on the internet 24/7. `British Values` ? `God`? The lot.

David Soward
May 20th, 2015
8:05 PM
A bit wordy, it has to be said, but a refreshing article which draws attention to the shallowness of much modern-day atheism. It needn't be shallow, as Murray shows, but our 21st century dualism tends to divide people into camps, far more than it should. Quakers have a point, when they include theists and non-theists in their ranks, and refuse to sign up to creeds or doctrine. Can we persuade you, Douglas, to join us at www.wychwoodcircle.org. some day?

Bruce Charlton
May 19th, 2015
1:05 PM
What is the point of saying that we are painted into a corner without checking whether we really are painted into a corner? What is this nonsense about the probably irreversible damage that science and historical criticism have done to the literal truth-claims of religion? Honestly, people really need to be able to distinguish between metaphysics and wissenschaft. Science and historical criticism exclude religion by assumption, therefore they can have nothing to say - and say nothing - about the truth claims of religion... etc Commented at: http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/the-big-problem-and-solut...

Anonymous
May 13th, 2015
10:05 PM
Thousands of people have become Christians over the last 40 years, many of them through the Alpha course. The personal accounts they give are very similar to those Douglas Murray has heard Muslim converts describe.

Julian Bailey
May 13th, 2015
9:05 PM
Thankyou for this fascinating article Mr Murray. It is interesting how many of us have lost our fascination for knowledge and solutions to hard problems and have abdicated responsibility for these decisions. The Big Bang Theory may be interesting as a theory regarding the start of the world but it speaks of nothing concerning basic human needs.

Paul Simmmons
May 7th, 2015
11:05 AM
Douglas Murray’s appraisal (Is the West’s loss of faith terminal? May 2015) that western culture in its broadest and deepest sense is drifting, dislocated from acknowledgment of, let alone respect for, its Judaeo-Christian roots – and that this matters and is dangerous because it opens the door to cultures and attitudes inimical to humane, enlightenment values - is a profoundly significant and welcome one. The ferocity and cold-bloodedness of parliamentary opposition to the mildest attempts to mitigate the precarious position of the unborn in our brave new world demonstrate this. Mr. Murray’s calls for efforts to mend the “split” between the “thin and shallow” world-view of contemporary liberal democracies and this cultural heritage, and the call, so astutely made, deserves a response. We might begin with the photograph of the silhouetted figure looking out to the horizon which accompanies the article, Antony Gormley’s “Another Place” – described by Mr. Murray as an artwork “which brings to the fore the image of resurrection which lies at the heart of our culture”. For many, I suspect, the artwork is more subtle than an image of resurrection, but instead brings to the fore as part of its enigmatic appeal the question of resurrection - is there a resurrection? Is there “another place” and, if so, who inhabits it? What has happened to our ancestors and where will we find ourselves in our turn? Is the man on the foreshore hopelessly trapped in such issues, or does he transcend them? Whatever one’s intuition as to the answers to these questions, it is encouraging that an artwork of such surpassing quality is popular: the British public are perhaps not, after all, so shallow as to be wholly satisfied with a diet of fried battery-chicken and Strictly, and remain capable of appreciating fundamental questions subtly posed. A work such as ‘Another Place’ cannot be reduced to the level of an ‘illustration’ of philosophical/ religious questions, but it is nevertheless a response in some measure to the very “split” Mr. Murray identifies. If the man looking out to the horizon is everyman (as he surely is) how does resurrection apply to him? In the Judaeo-Christian tradition, resurrection to life rather than to judgment requires salvation as a prelude. Is everyman really so corrupt in his nature that he faces only either annihilation or resurrection to a withering judgment without this salvation? Are the thoughts and intentions of his heart really and in truth “only evil continually” as was the case, apparently, with those wiped-out in the deluge in which only those in Noah’s ark – an unmistakable symbol of the cross – were saved? Personally, I think not, but it is in asking such questions that the split begins to be bridged.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.