You are here:   Anti-colonialism > Barack Obama: the Last Anti-Colonialist
 

Eventually, Obama discovered the truth about his father from his half-sister Auma. Still, Obama didn't give up on his father. He went to his grave and wept. He pressed his hand into the earth and tried to commune with his father "through Africa's red soil". But Obama couldn't get back his dead father, so instead he decided to take his dream. He concluded that, although flawed as a man, the senior Obama had great ideals. Obama would realise those ideals, and perhaps in this way he could complete the family circle and be worthy of his father's love. Through a kind of sacramental rite at the family tomb, the father's ideology became the son's birthright.

But what was Barack Obama Sr's ideology? First and foremost, he was an anti-colonialist. He came of age in Kenya during that country's struggle for independence from the British. The Obama family suffered the scars of colonialism. In the 1950s, when the Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, cracked down on the Mau Mau guerrillas in Kenya, Obama Sr was arrested for his political activities, and Barack's grandfather Onyango Obama was placed in a detention camp and allegedly tortured. Anti-colonialism arose out of anger and humiliation, and in the case of Obama Sr those sentiments were the product of direct experience.

I know quite a bit about anti-colonialism because I grew up in India in the period immediately following British rule. Anti-colonialism was very much in the air during the 1960s and 1970s, when I was a boy roaming the streets of Mumbai. My father was an anti-colonialist, as was his father and most of my uncles, and pretty much everyone else I knew. Anti-colonialism was the dominant political ideology in the Third World in the second half of the 20th century. Barack Obama Sr's anti-colonialism is very familiar to me, although many Americans view it with incomprehension. 

The premises of anti-colonialism, although familiar, are worth spelling out. The general idea is that the world is divided into two camps: the colonisers who are the white West, and the colonised, who are the peoples of the Third World. Anti-colonialists usually assume that the rich countries got rich by invading, occupying and looting the poor countries. Further, they claim that today it is no longer Europe but America that is the rogue elephant stampeding its way across the world. America now invades and occupies other countries in much the same way that the French and the British once did. Anti-colonialists hold that even when colonialism formally ends, there remain powerful concentrations of economic power in the rich countries. These economic elites are faulted with "neocolonialism", which is colonialism in a new form, economic exploitation. In the anti-colonialist view, these wicked elites — the banks, the insurance companies, the pharmaceutical companies, the oil companies and so on — continue to oppress not only their own people but also people across the globe. 

Barack Obama Sr was an economist, and he described his economic views as "African socialist". In 1965, he wrote an article in the East Africa Journal in which he placed his socialist views firmly within the larger framework of anti-colonialism. He began with the anti-colonial objective, which is of course national liberation. But for him, political liberation is not enough. Kenya, after all, became politically independent in 1963. What Obama Sr is concerned about is economic independence. "Is it the African who owns this country? If he does, then why should he not control the economic means of growth in this country?"

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
markkraljevic
November 1st, 2010
3:11 PM
if obama is the last anti-colonialist then maybe the last of the big brash americans of the john wayne type are no longer of white anglo-saxon stock but were born in india and elsewhere in the former third world.they have completely rejected their origins and have become super believers in america the great.

Anosognosia
October 31st, 2010
5:10 PM
Human history is replete with colonialists, from Sumeria to America. Barack's anti-colonial fervor is perhaps more 'anti-Western' than it is anti-exploitative. As the erstwhile 'third-world' plunges headlong into the abyss of Western ideology and economy, perhaps Obama's dream is the essence of insurgency. Is his ongoing war-on-terror actually a counter-intuitive blast against the logical delusions of Aristotle too ? Obama's father and grandfather were deeply traumatized indeed, as was his mother. Perhaps two terms as a U.S.Senator from Illinois, added further insult to his injury ?

charlesgriffith...
October 27th, 2010
11:10 PM
The author's last paragraph seems to this American, who has lived in Colonial Hong Kong, to be an attempt to build upon and perpetuate the post World War II idea that America is the provider of first and foremost resort for the world's defense needs with our American blood and cash, bales upon bales of the latter. It seems to me to be a strange case of wanting to perpetuate the dependency of the world upon America. A perpetuation of...call it.."reverse colonialism"? I'm no Obama supporter at all. But, I support the main idea of his withdrawal plans in Central Asia. Just get out of there. We're being played by the Afghans and Pakistani's as "useful idiots" now that the plague of Saddam and his poison-gassing of his own people plus his invasion of his neighbor Kuwait has been removed. Those facts seem to be put away on a back shelf, out of sight. We're no longer wanted there except for whatever can be squeezed from us in the form of this new "entitlement"....called USAID. The double-dealing in that theatre has become impossible to disguise and cast aside. If, and this is a huge "if", Obama is in fact conniving sub-rosa with the Afghans and Pakistani's to help orchestrate our withdrawal as DeSousa faintly seems to believe, then that is America's business. DeSousa, of all people, should be aware of the futility of America effecting any lasting changes in that Central Asia and sub-continent with its heritage of centuries of barbarism. Indeed, its past time for those countries in that arena to take care of their own problems.

charlesgriffith...
October 27th, 2010
10:10 PM
This American who lived six years in Hong Kong (Kowloon Tong)during the 1960's remembers the undisguised disdain displayed to all who were not British. The Chinese, of course, were only a population-management problem. I worked out at Kai Tak as an airline assistant station manager and got along just fine with the airport management staff and Jardines' BOAC and CPA reps after they understood that I was not to be patronized. Almost half a century has passed and those sniffily "tolerating" impressions remain.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.