You are here:   Climate change > Cameron Cannot Win Without Cheap Energy
 

Take the £92.50/MWH strike price agreed between DECC and EDF for the two new nuclear reactors at Hinkley Point. At the current market price of £52/MWH EDF would be paid £40.50/MWH by a levy on our bills. If the price came down to the German level of £44/MWH, the compensation to EDF would be £48.50/MWH. As for offshore wind, with its strike price of £140/MWH, the costs will be astronomical.

Finally, there is the question of shale gas: how much there is, how much is recoverable, how much it will cost — and will ingrained British nimbyism ever let proper exploration begin?

After three years of inaction, the Coalition decided to encourage, cautiously, exploratory drilling, starting in politically sensitive West Sussex. In the next year or so we can expect more drilling of the Bowland Shale in Lancashire, where two well-funded companies, Cuadrilla and Igas, have substantial concessions. Centrica, owner of British Gas, has "farmed in" to the Cuadrilla operation, paying £60 million to fund six wells.

The British Geological Survey (BGS) report into shale potential was published by DECC earlier this year after lengthy political delay. It mostly confines itself to an assessment of the Bowland-Hodder Shale, which runs across the country from the Lancashire coast to Yorkshire, Humberside and Lincolnshire, and as far south as Derby. The BGS central case is that there are 264 trillion cubic feet (tcf) in place, which compares with Cuadrilla's estimate of 200 tcf in just its concession around Blackpool. At this stage, any attempt to estimate how much of this can be technically produced, let alone at an economic cost, is guesswork. However, going by American experience, a conservative estimate is that 10 per cent of gas in place can be produced economically: 20 tcf from Cuadrilla's area, or 26 tcf from the wider area considered by the BGS.

To put this into context, the North Sea has produced 85 tcf since 1970, and remaining proved reserves are 8.7 tcf. These numbers are elastic, and depend on price, fiscal regime, technology and geology. But they demonstrate that in time Britain's shale resources should prove nearly as important as the North Sea has done.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
It doesn'tadd up...
November 14th, 2013
9:11 PM
It's a shame this article is marred by some factual inaccuracies, as the general thrust of it is right on target. But it was the great consolidation of 2002 under Labour that created the Big 6 - not John Major. Forward natural gas trades around 60 p/therm, or £20/MWh - not £60/MWh - making the percentage impact of the carbon floor price three times as great. The impact on power bills is further amplified by the fact that the charge is on gas input, not power output, which effectively doubles it by the time transmission loss is allowed for. Much larger charges apply to coal sourced generation - roughly double again. I detect no worries in Parliament about Ed Davey's Expensive Energy Bill: it passed the Commons by 396 to 8 with support from across the House. The Lords just added to the misery by effectively banning coal stations from supplying baseload power - although that amendment was only supported by Lord Deben among so-called Tories: that will of course add to our bills still further.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.