You are here:   Al Gore > How the US's Climate of Opinion Changed
 

And that's why President Obama dropped global warming and started talking about transforming America's boring old fossil fuel economy into an exciting new clean energy economy and replacing all those dirty jobs digging coal and drilling for oil with green jobs that are almost as desirable as practising law (well, not really). As Obama put it in June 2010: "As we recover from this recession, the transition to clean energy has the potential to grow our economy and create millions of jobs — but only if we accelerate that transition. Only if we seize the moment." For those not captivated by this vision, Obama warns that if we are unwilling to grow wealthier by replacing cheap fossil fuels with expensive but unreliable alternatives such as windmills, then we will lose the race to build tomorrow's technologies to China. (Note that China gets 80 per cent of its electricity from coal, while the US gets just under half.)

Polls have shown that Americans are highly enthusiastic about clean energy, at least until they learn how much more expensive it is. But the new rationale has quickly worn thin as the claims of green jobs have been revealed as bogus. The end of the line was reached in September, when solar panel manufacturer Solyndra, which had received $527 million in government loans, collapsed. Risky loans are just one part of the massively expensive corporate welfare system that has been created for renewable energy. Wind and solar power and ethanol get billions of taxpayer dollars a year in subsidies. Solyndra's collapse was so embarrassing that when the president presented his new jobs package to a joint session of Congress a few days later, he didn't mention green jobs or clean energy. Instead, he focused on new highway projects.

The rhetoric has been abandoned, but not the policies. Immediately after the Democrats' stunning defeat in the 2010 congressional elections, Obama said: "Cap-and-trade was just one way of skinning the cat." Faced with a hostile Congress, the administration is pursuing a mind-boggling list of new regulations under existing pollution laws to skin the cat — that is, to put the squeeze on fossil fuel production and use.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has finalised Clean Air Act rules to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and is at various stages of implementing new regulations to further reduce conventional air pollutants from electricity utilities, industrial boilers and cement plants, and to impose tighter standards on regional haze and on air pollutants produced in one state that are blown into other states. Utilities have already started announcing coal plant closures. A novel interpretation of the Clean Water Act has been concocted to block permits for new surface coalmines in Appalachia, including West Virginia (which since Gore has become a reliably Republican state in presidential voting).

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
James Rust
October 1st, 2011
1:10 AM
Great article. Some Republcan shoud use energy issues as a campaign platform and rid the country of all elected officals that use CAGW as a means of ruining the country. Renewable energy sources can be summarized thus: "Would you buy cars that cost two to ten times competitor models that only runs 2 to 3 hours per day. Obviously. some will because battery powered cars are being sold." Germany is a green country with about one half the world's installed solar energy. The residential cost of electricity in Germany is 35 cents per kilowatt-hour and rising. China is our competitor with more than three quarters of its electricity coming from coal and electricity selling for 3 cents per kilowatt-hour. James Rust

John K. Oswlad
September 30th, 2011
2:09 PM
Bachmann is the gal. But the $64,000.00 question is whether she is electable. She has taken a consistenty strong stance against the fraud that is global warming; sees the socialist agenda behind the scam and clearly articulates same to the public. She is a conservative through and through and will start the process of dismantling big government. As to her lack of executive experience, the same never stopped Lincoln from being a great President. Problem is that she will be portrayed as a "right-wing extremist", insensitive to the needs of the "little guy". Her intelligence will be attacked (unjustly) and her Christian faith will be said to be exclusionary. Because of these qualities (attributes), she will be attacked with a vigor from the Left that no other Republican candidate would engender. America needs Michele Bachmann. But does America WANT Michele Bachmann is the real question.

Thomas Burton
September 30th, 2011
3:09 AM
Mitt Romney--what a fraud. He will say anything to get elected. He was a liberal governor in Massachusetts, but now claims to be a conservative. He would be worse than Bush.

Bob McDougal
September 28th, 2011
11:09 PM
ALGORE was pushing it so I knew it had to be a lie!

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.