You are here:   Features > Muslim Women Deserve Better than Sharia Law
 
The growing acceptance of sharia in the UK has led to the formation of a Muslim Arbitration Tribunal in 2007 which, according to its website, was endorsed by the former President of the Supreme Court, Lord Phillips.

In 2008 Sheikh Faiz-ul-Aqtab Siddiqi, spokesman for the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal, defended the decision in six domestic violence cases arbitrated by a UK sharia court not to punish the alleged perpetrators or report them to the police but rather to advise the men to take anger management classes and receive mentoring from so-called community elders so that marriages could be "saved". In each case, the women were advised by the sharia court to withdraw their complaints to the police. Usually, they obey.

The voices of Muslim women who have suffered terrible consequences as a result of sharia taking root in Britain are often silenced. I spoke with a number of women who have had experience of sharia courts.

Fawzia married her husband when she was 16 years old and was divorced eight years later. The marriage was an Islamic ceremony, and her divorce was eventually granted by a sharia council four years after she first went to see her local imam. Fawzia's story, and those of numerous other women, should provide a cautionary tale of how sharia courts are gaining creeping acceptance in the UK.

Afzal, the man chosen by her parents to be Fawzia's husband, was 30 years old and had been married previously. "I had never met him," Fawzia told me when we met in Hyde Park, her chador covering her tiny frame. "When he started to hit me I thought it was me causing him to do it." What Fawzia did not know when she married Afzal was his history of violence towards women. The year before he married Fawzia, Afzal had broken his sister's wrist in an attempt to keep her from seeing her boyfriend, and then attacked his brother's mother-in-law when she intervened.

"He started hitting me when I was pregnant with my first baby," says Fawzia, who agreed to meet me through a women's counselling service, "and it never stopped."

By the time Fawzia was 20 she had three children and numerous scars from the regular beatings she endured from Afzal, but had nowhere to escape to. She went alone to see her imam, who suggested she speak to a scholar at one of the many sharia councils in London. "I told [the scholar] that I was desperately unhappy, that my children were being neglected, that I could not cope in this marriage. I admitted he hit me. I was told to be a good wife and to make my husband more happy."

Fawzia was eventually granted an Islamic divorce, which her husband contested, four years later. She had to pay £400, the standard cost for women applying for divorce. Men who apply for divorce to sharia courts are charged just £200.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Dana
January 13th, 2015
1:01 AM
Not true that adoptees do not inherit under sharia law. But they inherit from their biological parents, not their adoptive parents. I would actually prefer that over the way Westerners do adoption because they're rather like transsexuals in that way--reality is reality because I say it is reality, never mind what the actual facts are. Western adoption involves falsifying a legal document and forcing a mother to pretend she never birthed her child and the child to pretend genetic strangers are his or her parents. Islam doesn't allow that--and in the process also accidentally protects against incest and the disinheritance of children and the cutting off of adults from their genetic and medical history. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. There are undoubtedly Muslim tenets you would agree with, even as there are many you wouldn't.

Anonymous
December 20th, 2014
7:12 AM
And she is an anti Israeli, pro Palestinian communist.

amcdonald
October 15th, 2014
10:10 PM
Our politicians seem content to let the islamified Birmingham schools revert to type. The main parties want the muslim votes. They`ll betray Israel for muslim votes. They`ll betray civilisation for muslim votes. Are the party leaders happy to be used as useful idiots by uber rich Islam ? There`s no Kaffir- Infidels Party to vote for. The closest to this is unPC `shambolically british` UKIP. They weren`t expensively uneducated at Eton and Cambridge and don`t have dodgy Politics,Philosophy and Economics degrees either.

Anonymous
October 14th, 2014
12:10 PM
It's about time we said no to all so called religious based groups trying to get their interpretation on how to live your life spread over the wider populace. No one should be held at law to the whims of an imam deciding what Mohammed would have thought on a particular topic. The Koran (and the rest of the religious texts were all written many many centuries ago and other than tenents like don't kill people (of whatever religion) not just fakirs, have no relevance today. It's about time we just said no to all religion and its insidious ways.

Janleenewell
October 10th, 2014
11:10 PM
What has been said is that this is the way that Islams want to Islamisise Europe and also America. Because with our laws we will let it happen.

amcdonald
October 9th, 2014
11:10 PM
The recent Sun front page muslim woman wearing a union jack flag will be duplicated by muslim women in Israel draping themselves in the Israeli flag? Inna from Femen is more precise in the Huffington Post (7/10/14)`Islam Is Peace`- But Islam is Also Isis. It looks like Polyglot5 is right too.

Polyglot5
October 8th, 2014
9:10 AM
Siddiqi is quick to resort to taqqya - strategy of lying to westerners in order to project a heavily sugar-coated image of Islam and shari'a. Don't believe a word of his mansplaining.

amcdonald
September 29th, 2014
1:09 PM
Presumably MAT has a list of women it has successfully helped in the past 35 years and they can be contacted to verify Shaykh Siddiqi`s claims ? And Shaykh Siddiqi is happy with the sharia divorce fee of £200 for men and £400 for women ? Does Shaykh S think muslim women deserve better than sharia law ? Or is he actually advocating it ? It`s handy for our intelligence services to know for sure who`s advocating sharia in this country.

Shaykh Siddiqi
September 26th, 2014
7:09 PM
You have reported inaccurately the fact that the 6 women withdrew their complaint to the police. In fact they had not reported the matter to the police and were encouraged by MAT in the first instance to report the matter to the domestic violence officer at the local police station. The women showed clear reluctance to do so as they clearly stated that this would not resolve their problem but create a whole myriad of problems and ultimately end the marriage. They stated that the police and the Social Services and/or most DV charities were inept and incapable of resolving their problems but contacting them would only cause the demise of their marriage. They approached MAT as it is the only organisation in the country that is capable of and has for the last 35 years helped women especially and sometimes men to eliminate any form of violence within the relationship and to maintain a healthy future with their spouses. Thus Julie Bindel is invited to first properly investigate the facts rather than misstate the truth. Please amend your article accordingly.

amcdonald
September 25th, 2014
11:09 PM
£200 for a man to divorce and £400 for a woman. And available on every muslim doorstep. Cheap cowboy-Islamic capitalism. And Michael Gove and David Cameron are saying/doing nothing ? Sending jets to bomb scumbag Islamic State abroad but actually ignoring the women victims here/home front and cutting funding to womens refuges ? !

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.