You are here:   Columns >  Manchester Square > Pax Britannica
 
Pax Britannica
July/August 2013

Whoever was right — the French Anglophile or the Scottish Francophile — there is no denying the distinctive contribution of the English-speaking peoples. Daniel Hannan, whose article on Europe appears on page 40 in this issue, has written a book about the Anglosphere entitled Inventing Freedom, to be published by HarperCollins in November. Among the fundamental ideas for which he gives the Anglophones credit are free and regular elections, equality for women, freedom of contract and private property. While others may dispute this or that detail, the overall achievement is undeniable. The world would be unrecognisable without the cultural matrix of which the English language is merely the most visible manifestation.  

Can the British themselves, who make up an ever-diminishing fraction of more than a billion people who speak English, still offer something unique to the world? In an exchange with Robert Conquest in the New York Review of Books in 2000, Michael Ignatieff argued that Britain had irreversibly joined Europe and hence diverged from English-speaking countries such as the US or Canada. He accused Conquest of nurturing the "romantic illusion" of a union of English-speaking peoples. Thirteen years later, that idea may still seem romantic, but it is much less of an illusion than the chimera of European unity. There the scales have finally fallen from British eyes, enabling us to see how divergent our interests are from those of the infernal contraption that the EU has become.

British leaders of public opinion need to think again about the Anglosphere in political as well as cultural terms. "Go West, young man," was Horace Greeley's advice to Americans after the Civil War, and many young Britons are drawn to the Western hemisphere rather than the Continent. But the fastest-growing region of the Anglosphere is actually India and the Far East, where British talents are in demand.

The glittering prizes of tomorrow will go to the politicians who can best articulate the case for embracing with enthusiasm the inevitable realignment of British interest and interests towards the Anglosphere. Our best hope of renewing and defending Western civilisation is to play to our strengths, above all the fact that we have the good fortune to speak the modern world's lingua franca. "Our tongue is rough," says Henry V, and so it is; but English has conquered the world without a drop of blood being spilt. If the British cannot turn that fact to advantage, we do not deserve to regain our independence and our pride.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
jim
June 29th, 2013
11:06 PM
Is there hope? the English have turned their backs on God and reject the very traditions which made them great by allowing millions of people in from third world countries that do not respect your laws or traditions, namely the Muslims. You will fade away because you reject the very anchors you need to hold on to to be great.

Anjaan
June 29th, 2013
3:06 PM
Britain has nothing to give to the world. It has now only one way to go, that is down. Tagging along, either the US, or Europe, will not save Britain from going down, only extend it. Britain's success in the 19th and 20th century is largely due to ruthless exploitation of its colonies. India saw two major famines in India, one within just eleven year of British establishing a foothold in India in 1857. The other one was in 1943 under the watch of Churchill. A believer would perhaps describe Britain's terminal decline as ..... it has no way other than facing the blow back of divine retribution for its ruthless excesses committed in the past two centuries.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.