You are here:   Columns >  Marketplace >
 
January 2009

An example is the Royal Bank of Scotland, which by mid-2008 had written "credit default swaps" to the tune of more than £400 billion compared with its own capital of £40 billion. RBS ought in an average year to make a few hundred million pounds from its CDS business. Contrary to rumour, the activity is not that risky, despite the huge face value of the transactions. Like a bookie, RBS might accept a bet that a particular credit risk/horse would win and then offset that by accepting another bet that the same credit risk/horse would lose, taking money from two sets of customers and having quite a small net exposure.

But bookmaking can go wrong. In extreme conditions several outsiders, for each of which it has been difficult to match positive and negative bets and significant uncovered risk remains, might win a sequence of races. The bookie is then bust. When markets start to worry and keep on worrying, the fear becomes - as Roosevelt might have said - a fear of fear itself. Even organisations as diversified and massive as RBS, Citibank or Goldman Sachs might then have difficulty in funding their business. Leverage leads to fear and, when things go wrong, people scurry for safety.

Second, Soros saw that the contagion of fear would hit the banks worst of all. Over the last 40 years banks have built up huge claims on each other, much of it in the so-called "offshore markets". Since summer 2007, they have been cancelling these claims. Any bank dependent on financing its assets by inter-bank indebtedness has had to shrink its lending to genuine non-bank customers, causing the global "credit crunch". Banks with large books of CDS business or holding exotic securities (such as supposedly triple-A bonds priced at huge and puzzling discounts to their original cost) were most vulnerable.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anonymous
December 19th, 2008
7:12 PM
Tim You like many mainstream economist's are still in denial.Soros is either right or wrong now,this is not a 15 round fight ,the damage is out there to see.It doesn't have to be as bad as the 30's for Soros to be right it just needs to be far bigger than a blip and it's there already.Instead of eating some of your words you best eat all.I got it wrong too ,to some extent by following a highly regarded economist but I have realized I have to think for myself and not be a follower.It is actually quite liberating to eat your words in one meal,to spread it out means makes it a bigger meal as you have to re eat so much.So nibbling!

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.