You are here:   Civilisation >  Music > Timing is Everything
 

Time is the stuff of music: music manipulates our experience of time; it plays with the rhythm of experience; it stretches and complicates our relationship to the passing of time. If the world of physics is a space-time continuum, music is a pitch-time continuum. We use spatial metaphors to express our experience of frequency - notes are higher and lower, something expressed formally in staff notation, and deeply inscribed in our experience of music as performers and listeners. A large interval between two notes is a gulf to be stretched over. The quintessential musical form, melody, as it moves up and down in pitch space, over time, is a sort of quasi-miraculous bridging of the gap between the abandoned past, the ungraspable present and the as-yet-to-be-achieved, utterly unreal future. We grasp it and, as we do so, time is attended to and made palpable and affective.

It's no coincidence that the great age of music as metaphysics - Schopenhauer above all - coincided with the construction of larger and more complex forms in classical music. These brought a specialised form of rationality, musical rationality, to the subjective experience of time, through both the eked out, endless melody of Wagner, and the great symphonic structures of Bruckner and Mahler. Nineteenth-century music's ambitions for itself were in many ways as cosmic as the Pythagorean vision of an art form in tune with the construction of the universe itself, the music of the spheres. It wanted to mirror the ebb and flow of being itself.

While this all seems impossibly grandiose in a postmodern age, classical music still has the capacity to generate visions of the sublime. Here is Daniel Barenboim, recently quoted in the International Herald Tribune: "Since every note produced by a human being has a human quality, there is a feeling of death with the end of each one, and through that experience there is a transcendence of all the emotions that these notes can have in their short lives; in a way, one is in direct contact with timelessness."

There does seem a sort of affinity here between musical ambitions and the kind of metaphysics disdained by Anglo-American analytic philosophers. Karl Jaspers (1883-1969), for example, wrote of the possibility of certain experiences as "instants of eternity in time", of a human capacity to be transported to an eternal present. Surely music is one of these routes to epiphany?

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Ujjval
January 4th, 2009
10:01 PM
Re Mr Wonderful's wonderful comments: We can come back from absorption as from deep sleep not knowing what we have experienced but summer young.

Mary E. Martin
January 4th, 2009
7:01 PM
Ivery much enjoyed reading this article. As a writer of novels, I have often wondered how one could write as beautifully as so many musicians are able to compose. It is of course a matter of hearing the lyric in everything. I believe it is the philosopher, Heinrich Zimmer who said, "The best things cannot be told. The second best are misunderstood." And so, we only have so many languages [art, music, literature etc.,] by which we may attempt to convey our humanity to one another and catch a few timeless moments.

Anonymous
January 4th, 2009
7:01 PM
No, my life is not this precipitous hour through which you see me passing at a run. I stand before my background like a tree. Of all my many mouths, I am but one, and that which soonest chooses to be dumb. I am the rest between two notes which, struck together, sound discordantly, because death’s note would claim a higher key. But in the dark pause, trembling, the notes meet, harmonious. And the song continues sweet. – Rainer Maria Rilke

Ted Schrey
January 4th, 2009
6:01 PM
If I remember Jaspers correctly he talked about eternity as hiding in the interstices of time--those unattended, tiny spaces between experiences. From which I conclude that eternity is not an instance of human experience. I wished that musicians would stick to their trade--making music--and leave the thinking to others.

MkII
January 4th, 2009
6:01 AM
"In the baldest sense this is pretentious nonsense. Music is a language..." This passage shows no clear argument, simply a "bald" assertion, without even a proper definition of terms. First, one must define precisely what one means by language - a term of some contention, one might well say. Furthermore, the claim that music is indeed a language is itself deeply controversial. If, for example, one considers language a means of communicating information, one could validly argue that this is not the purpose of music at all. Music - especially abstract instrumental music - has as little to do with information as poetry has to do with a news report. The asthetic experience, at least in certain cases, attempts to escape the bounds of the limited everyday to a more profound - and timeless - experiences. To argue whether this is a "human" experience or not is semantic and irrelevant. The point is that we do desire and seek this experience, and music seems to open a gateway to it. An analytic description inevitably fails to explain music, and in fact, trivializes that which makes music essential. It is exactly because of the failure of purely analytical language that we need music and the other arts.

Anonymous
January 4th, 2009
12:01 AM
All best, in timing and music-making, for 2009. I am already bearing down diligently on dissertation. Meetings with Vitor and Paul Breslin upcoming. I'll be in touch with you soon...

Fab
January 4th, 2009
12:01 AM
Yeah

Lady Murasaki
January 3rd, 2009
10:01 PM
Cantrell, or Larry as he likes to be called, is a well-known troll at many internet sites. He has no true opinions nor any contributions to make. His sole purpose is to attempt to create flame wars. Ignoring him is always the best option, like an obnoxious two year old he thrives on any attention paid him. He has been banned from many forums.

Dionysius
January 3rd, 2009
9:01 PM
Philosophy and music - apples and oranges actually. In philosophical language, certainly with regard to Heidegger, one can reach the outer limits of intellibility. In music, the most abstract forms, even Ives or Webern, remains hermetic only in a theorectical sense; as Spengler wrote many years ago, music concretizes from immediately upon its composition, rendering that which is thought to be abstract intellible.

Steve Meikle
January 3rd, 2009
8:01 PM
Alas the idea that space time needs to be transcended is in my opinion absurd. Such thinking is an expression of dissatisfaction, and dissatisfaction of this kind is what I hold to be at the root of gnostic heresy. If we need some kind of transcendance from our empty little lives let us seek something, or Someone, that can give it. This will free music from an expectation of something it cannot deliever which in turn will free us to simply enjoy the music. Not transcendance from space time but resolution of our alienation from God, to be found in christ. Now that music is no longer a drug i need, it is a gift i can enjoy even more than ever

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.