You are here:   iTunes > Vinyl Revival Causes Discord
 

The formidable Lisitsa, faster with a soundbite than Obama at an oil slick, declares: "Digital did to music what Photoshop did to photography." She has a point, but you see where this is leading: to a perception that new technology is the enemy of musical truth.

The danger here is that the classical community, itself a tiny fragment of the global music market, will split into camps of mutual incomprehension. The hungriest consumers for classical music are now in East Asia, chiefly Korea and China, where most purchases are by download. While a growing minority of Westerners wistfully embrace the dead LP, Asian ears are being iTuned to an opacity of sound that music professionals consider meagre, offensive and unacceptable. 

At this point, the vinyl revival ceases to be a trivial matter. It amounts to a Tower of Babel moment when one half of the world can no longer understand the other and music cannot bridge the gap. It is all very well for aesthetes with high-end music systems to welcome the return of flat-pack LPs, but their satisfaction distracts from the chief priority. 

The winner of the 2012 orchestral Grammy was a download-only Los Angeles concert of Brahms's Fourth. It sounded terrible. Unless Apple and its rivals can be pressured to produce a credible sonic image of rich orchestral sound, our ears will be progressively impoverished and the next generation will be raised in ignorance of what real music might be. At that point, even a rational column like this might revert to 33 revolutions per minute.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Richard Carlisle
April 26th, 2012
1:04 PM
A long overdue topic IMHO; here what I feel and/or have read in print are the reasons for interest regeneration in vinyl: 1) CD's are small and unable to be packaged in a way that presents the album art as well, ie, size matters because among other reasons you can reproduce by color copier any number of vinyl covers and end up with a treasured visual collection of album art that can be utilized in obvious ways. 2) CD's are suspect regarding sound quality: if they are good as most audiophiles like to claim then why did the "super CD" emerge-- looks like there was a deficiency now being corrected. 3) Our downloads, all held in a "cloud" could, we feel knowing what previous hackers have accomplished be pulled out from under us like a proverbial rug, leaving us whistling Dixie or another tune of our choice. 4) Lastly, my experience in recent years since rediscovering vinyl has proven that scratchiness doesn't necessarily come with the territory... in testing a new pristine disc, playing it more than forty times without a hint of background noise developing, all due to wiping the surface with a slightly damp paper towel whenever taking it from its jacket. Too much trouble? Not for the enjoyment found in pure sound unmatchable anywhere else-- unless you hire an orchestra.

Paul Kelly
April 26th, 2012
12:04 PM
Great article, Norman! Many good points, I think. And while I couldn't care less about the politics of it (or the major label's sales figures, either) I do find that although I'm listening to more LPs these days, I'm also listening to far more CDs than LPs and more of both than downloads. When the quality of a download equals that of a CD I'll be more tempted. Right now, downloads are for convenience of travel only and iPod listening only when I have to. Great for podcasts and audiobooks, though! Thanks again for a thoughtful article. Cheers! Paul

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.