You are here:   Dispatches > Pristina: Kosovo's Liberal Islam
 

On February 17, 2008, Kosovo declared independence from Serbia. Some are concerned about what NATO, the United Nations, and the European Union have nurtured there since the military and humanitarian intervention in 1999. James Jatras, a U.S.-based advocate for the Serbian Orthodox Community, put it bluntly last year when he said Kosovo was a “a beachhead into the rest of Europe” for “radical Muslims” and “terrorist elements.” It’s an assertion without evidence. “We’ve been here for so long,” said United States Army Sergeant Zachary Gore in Eastern Kosovo, “and not seen any evidence of it, that we’ve reached the assumption that it is not a viable threat.”

Nine in 10 of Kosovo’s citizens are ethnic Albanians, and more than 90 per cent of them are at least nominal Muslims. Most are so thoroughly modern and secularised that moderate doesn’t quite say it. The only word that can fairly describe Islam as practiced by the majority of Albanian Muslims is liberal. No nation can be entirely free of extremists, but Kosovo is one of the least religiously extreme Muslim-majority countries on Earth. Radical Islamists aren’t there in significant numbers now, and they aren’t likely to be in the future. Some places may be fertile ground for radicalism in the future, but Kosovo isn’t one of them for many of the same reasons that Christian theocracy isn’t coming to Western Europe.

I arrived here shortly after the declaration of independence, and the first thing I looked for – as always when I visit a Muslim-majority country – was the treatment and status of women.

Women who dress with their hair, ankles, and sometimes even faces showing in places like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the Taliban-controlled parts of Afghanistan are often beaten or worse.

In Kosovo, by contrast, almost all women, even in small villages, dress like women in the rest of Europe. Streets, cafés, restaurants, and bars are not all-male affairs as they are in much of the Islamic world, where women spend almost all their lives behind walls. If it weren’t for the occasional mosque minaret on the skyline, there is little visible evidence that Kosovo is a Muslim-majority country at all. Kosovo looks, feels, and is European.

A small number of well-heeled Islamic extremists from the Gulf states have moved into Kosovo to rebuild damaged mosques and transform liberal Balkan Islam into the more severe version found in the deserts of Saudi Arabia. They’ve had a small amount of success with a similar project in nearby Bosnia, but they’re meeting stiffer resistance from Kosovo’s religious community as well as from secular citizens.

“We are working very hard to stop these kinds of movements,” said Professor Xhabir Hamiti, of the Islamic studies department at the University of Pristina. “These kinds of movements are dangerous for all nations, for all faiths, for all religions. We are Muslims, but we think the European way. I am a Muslim, I am a scholar, I know how to deal with Islam in my country. There is no need for Arabs to come here. I have no need for their suggestions, no need for their explanations. We created our Islam ourselves here, and we can continue our Islam with our own minds.”

It would be wrong to suggest Kosovo has no Islamists at all, but in the last election in late 2007, the country’s single Islamic party gained only 1.7 per cent of the vote. Kosovo is not the Middle East, and Albanians are not Arabs. The majority converted to Islam relatively recently under Turkish Ottoman rule, and Albanian culture was first solidly Christian. “We Albanians,” Dom Lush Gjergji recently wrote, “descendants of the Illyrians, are Christians from the time of the Apostles… Without Christianity there would be no Albanian people, language, culture, or traditions… Albanians consider Christianity their patrimony, their spiritual and cultural inheritance.” Gjergji is a Catholic priest, but I heard similar comments from many who self-identify as Muslims. “Albanian people are not very religious,” said Agron Rezniqi, of the Friendship Association between Kosovo and Israel “We come from Catholicism, and for that, we are not such strong Muslims.”

Perhaps the best evidence available that Albanian Muslims, in both Kosovo and Albania proper, differ radically from their Arab world counterparts is their relationship with Jews and with Israel. Jews in Albania had an almost 100 per cent survival rate during the Nazi occupation. The country was known as a safe haven where Jews could find protection under the noses of the German authorities. According to Dan Michman, chief historian at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem, there were three times as many Jews in Albania at the end of the Second World War as there were at the beginning.

Both Albania and Kosovo have excellent relations with Israel, and Israelis are more than welcome to travel and even live among Albanians. An Israeli from Tel Aviv named Shachar Caspi opened a bakery and a bistro bar in Pristina. “Nobody has given me any problems or been against Israel,” he told me. “[Kosovars] had good relations with Jewish people even back in the old days. And nobody here is radical. On the contrary, people are very warm, they are very nice, they have taken Islam to a beautiful place, not to a violent place. When they hear I am Israeli, the way they react, they react very warmly.”

Much of the angst about Kosovo’s alleged radicalism centres on the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), an organisation that no longer even exists.

It was a short-lived guerrilla movement that rose up against Slobodan Milosevic’s régime, first to fight for independence from an apartheid-like system, and later as a defence against mass murder and ethnic-cleansing. The KLA was always thoroughly secular and in no way resembled a Balkan Hamas or Hezbollah.

Its leaders also distinguished themselves from their Bosnian counterparts when they flatly refused assistance from Arabic mujahideen who wanted to fight a holy war there against Serbs. Albanians don’t fight religious wars, not against themselves, and not against others.

There has been no fighting or even tension between Muslim and Christian Albanians, only between Serbs and Albanians.

The danger in Kosovo isn’t that international peace keepers are nurturing a jihad state. Rather, a premature withdrawal may lead to a resumption of the fighting between Serbs and Albanians that they moved in to stop in the first place.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Stjepan
July 24th, 2008
8:07 AM
Serbs are the monsters of Europe. Murdered quarter million, ethnically cleansed 5 million of Croat Catholics, Bosnian Muslims and Kosovar Albanians of Muslim and Catholic Creed. Serb Orthodox Church in Bosnia and Croatia penned projects how to massmurder hundreds of thousands Croats. Just take a look at the history of Karadzic hiding in Orthodox Churches. Cheers from a Croat who truly loves Kosovar Albanians who die for their nation but never their religion. I envy you people. You sacrificed your lives for Croatian independence, and I want to congratulate for your Kosovo independence! Long live Croatia! Long Live Kosovo!

chris johnson
July 22nd, 2008
10:07 AM
Just when I think I've got a fair grasp of the situation, it's blown apart, wider than the gulf of opinion, as expressed in the comments so far. So I'm back to research some more on the former Yugoslavia. The worrying thing is that as hotly contested as the whole thing is, as diverse and opposing are the main protagonists positions, the EU have come down solidly on the muslim side as demonstrated by the declaration of Kosovan indepenance, and the immediate response from Europes leaders. For ordinary people, there's religion and for their leaders, there's the POLITICS.

David Greenberg
July 22nd, 2008
9:07 AM
Since when is a relationship to Israel a measure of your value? the issue of Kosovo is not whether it is Islamist- the issue is if it is a conduit for Islamists due to its Islamic identity. Then there is the far more important question of Kosovar mafia, and nationalism, which has brutal consequences for Macedonia and Yugoslavia. How can I tell your article from hack work?

Mamijot
July 15th, 2008
5:07 PM
"AM Michael, Your post puzzles me. You must be aware that Albania was an enthusiastic ally of the Nazis in WWII, and in fact formed a separate Albanian Army to assist with Operation Barbaroza. As noted by comenters above, you refer only to Catholic relations. The Croats (also generally pro-Nazi) have a Catholic base, but the Serbs are basically Orthodox Christian. And the Albanians, under their Nazi German mentors, committed many, many atrocities against the Serbs during WWII. The Serbs were a large majority in Kosovo prior to WWII, but were ethnically cleansed during that war by Albania with Nazi assistance. Please look into the Albanian/Orthodox relationship at present." !!!!!!!!!! Graham, Congrats, for winning the price for .....ignorance. In case you don't find it to your full satisfaction, you can opt for the only remaining alternative: price for slander and defamation. Whatever you choose is welldeserved! I only exceptionally allow myself to use this kind of langauge, but your comment was more than inspiring to do so. Not for your information, but for that ofother readers with even a minimal interest ont he truth, Albania was never an ally of the Nazi, but instead a victim. Albania stood stronlgy against the invaders, both the Italians and the Germans, although with minimal sources compared to them. Rightly, the country was officially part of the interantional coallition that fought the battle against fascism, and at the end of WW II was recognized among the winners. The country did not have to pay any reparations to other parties, but instead receive from Italy and Federal Republic of Germany. The horrible resemblance with the psychological background in which the Nasism was nurtured in the period between the two WW, is with the today's Serbia. Is a really shocking truth that goes often ignored and/or unreported.The even more worrying differnec si that while in Germany with the death of the Fuhrer, Nasism died and Germans started their cleaning machinery, in Serbia there are not yet signs that this is going to happen. Regarding the Albanian /Orthodox relationships if by that you mean the attitude towards Orthodox churches in Kosovo, I would like to say that if they will continue to spread poison and ethnic heatress as they are doing, instead of serving religion they can hardly justify themselves. I have fresh memories from visiting them, and know what they stand for and what their real mission is.They are as good in instituting heatress for the non-Serbs as some extremist islamist Mosques are for calling for the extermination of Jews and other "infidels"

Anonymous
July 4th, 2008
12:07 AM

Serbs have a way of falsifying history and ignoring what they have done to others too. For example, if you ask them, the Kosovo Battle is the epic battle where their knights chose death over the Turk yolke despite enormous odds and Kosovo is theirs for ever because of that. Well, Lazar and many of his knights actually surrendered, and most others run away:

"The fact that Lazar and a good number of his knights surrendered in a vain attempt to save their lives did not excuse Vuk's failure to continue fighting...Vuk's treason was the direct result of a propaganda campaign initiated by Milica's supporter's as part of her quarrel with the prince."

Passage from "The Balkan Wars: Conquest, Revolution, and Retribution from the Ottoman Era to the Twentieth Century and Beyond" pp. 29 By Andre Gerolymatos

After the surrender, Lazar's daughter was married to the Turkish Sultan and Serbs helped them fight against Albania's Scanderbeg, Hungarians; Serbs lead siege of Constantinople and along with the Turks Serbs won the battle of Nicopolis against Balkans Christians. Many other battles from "heroic" Serb vassals space does not permit to enter here. Their entire history is essentially based on that lie, that Serbs fought bravely and Lazar choose the "eternal Kingdom" versus the earthy one. Well, Lazar surrendered like a coward to save his own skin, and Andre Gerolymatos is a very well respected Greek scholar and professor.


Dirk Blade
July 2nd, 2008
11:07 AM
Ignoring the ad hominen attacks on Mr Schwartz, to amplify what he and Mr Totten have have written. The Serbian Orthodox Church has since the early 1990s effectively been a branch of Serbian nationalism. The Orthodox building in downtown Pristina is a crude assertion of Belgrade's political authority, and was designed to intimidate the K Albanian population. Likewise, the still-unfinished St Sava's in Belgrade was not a response to increasing religious observance among the Serbs, but a public monument to Milosevic's - and Kostunica's - commitment to a Serbian nationalist revival. This parallels, though not exactly, the co-option of the Orthodox church in Russia by the Putin regime. Bosnia is somewhat different. Certainly Sarajevo appears a more Islamic space than it did ten years ago. But it has always been difficult to sort out what is politically-motivated hysteria from genuine fears about the influence of Arab-financed mosque building and cultural programmes. There are often-repeated allegations of financial incentives to grow a beard or wear a veil, which is obviously attractive in the depressing economic climate. But fears of Wahhabi/Salafist encroachment are exaggerated, as are the impact of the ex-mujahide'en. The failure of the Barcic group nr Sarajevo to develop any momentum illustrates this point. Bosnian Muslims don't like being told what to do by foreigners. There are reports of local students being 'indoctrinated' overseas and having more success, but these are largely anecdotal. And Bosnia is still one of the few places in the world where Salafists come off second-best in a shoot-out with the locals. This situation could change, of course, but (pro-Serb?) hysteria about foreign-funded Islamists penetrating the soft underbelly of Europe with NATO's help so far seem unfounded, and, by exaggerating the existing threat could undermine longer-term efforts at maintaining the 'European' brand of Islam in the region against Arab versions.

Anonymous
June 30th, 2008
3:06 PM
Plenty of anti-Serb sentiment expressed here. serbia minus Kosovo is more multi-ethnically tolerant than Kosovo. This explains why the latter is understandably not trusted to completely govern the south serb province. As for "lies," there was a good deal of lying for the Albanian nationalist cause. Here's one of several examples: http://www.aeronautics.ru/nws001/cbc01.htm Another having to do with trumped up casualty figures to encourage foreign intervention.

Craig C. Penniston
June 30th, 2008
5:06 AM
Mr Stephen Schwartz hides his muslim name whenever convenient. Suleiman Schwartz is hardly unbiased and is executive director of Center for Islamic Pluralism

Albiqete
June 30th, 2008
5:06 AM
Dobrica Cosic Former Serbian President “We lie to deceive ourselves, to console others; we lie for mercy, we lie to fight fear, to encourage ourselves, to hide our and somebody else’s misery. We lie for love and honesty. We lie because of freedom. Lying ie is the trait of our patriotism and the proof of our innate smartness. We lie creatively, imaginatively, inventively.” Six pivotal themes in Serbian propaganda are 1. Victimization, in which Serbs were constructed as collective victims first of the NDH, then of Tito’s Yugoslavia, and more specifically of Croats, Albanians, Bosnians, and other non-Serbs. 2. Dehumanization of designated ‘others’, in which Croats were depicted as ‘genocidal’ and as ‘Ustaše’, Bosnians were portrayed as ‘fanatical fundamentalists’, and Albanians were represented as not fully human. These processes of dehumanization effectively removed these designated ‘others’ from the moral field, sanctifying their murder or expulsion. 3. Belittlement, in which Serbia’s enemies were represented as beneath contempt. 4. Conspiracy, in which Croats, Slovenes, Albanians, the Vatican, Germany, Austria, and sometimes also the Bosnians as well as the U.S. and other foreign states, were seen as united in a conspiracy to break up the SFRY and hurt Serbia. In this way, the Belgrade regime’s obstinate disregard for the fundamental standards of international law was dressed up as heroic defiance of an anti-Serb conspiracy. 5. Entitlement, in which the Serbs were constructed as ‘entitled’ to create a Greater Serbian state to which parts of Croatia and Bosnia would be attached, under the motto,’ All Serbs should live in one state.’ 6. Superhuman powers and divine sanction. The Serbs were told that they were, in some sense, “super”. They were the best fighters on the planet, they could stand up to the entire world, and they were sanctioned by God himself, because of Tsar Lazar and the fact that Lazar had chosen the heavenly kingdom. Moreover, since Lazar had chosen the heavenly kingdom, the Serbs, encouraged to view themselves as Lazar’s heirs, were entitled to the earthly kingdom which Lazar had repudiated, as their patrimony. Serbian society began to stray down the path to war more or less unwittingly. Already in the years 1981—86, long before the other republics experienced anything like a ‘national awakening’, Serbia (and here one may include Kosovo too) was already sliding into a syndrome in which myths, threats, the allure of victory, and belligerent rhetoric filled the public discourse, giving Serbs a sense of common destiny but also separating them, psychologically, from the other peoples of socialist Yugoslavia. That this was an unhealthy state of collective mind is clear from the prominence of the themes of victimization, conspiracy, national entitlement, and divine sanction of the Serbian national project, as well as from the insistent campaigns of dehumanization, demonization, and belittlement of Croats, Bosnian Muslims, and Albanians, as well as other peoples and states, which began at this time. This syndrome, in an individual, would be considered psychotic; to the extent that it permeated much of Serbian society, perhaps especially in the countryside, one may speak of Serbia having been sucked into a kind of collective psychosis. And to the extent that Serbian war propaganda aimed at reinforcing and stimulating this state of mind, we may say that it aimed at inculcating and reinforcing neurotic and psychotic syndromes in Serbian society. This psychosis had its cultic saints – portraitsof Miloševiæ and Chetnik leader Draža Mihailoviæ were often displayed alongside those of saints canonized by the Church – had its bards (such as Simonida Stankoviæ and Ceca Ražnjatoviæ), and even had its official music – “turbo-folk”, a pop mixtureof folk-ethnic style with a rhythmic pounding beat. Moreover, this psychosis could even transport those infected to a state of consciousness which they mistook for a better world. Miloševi, for example, arriving dramatically at Kosovo polje in a helicopter on 28 June 1989, told those gathered for the six hundredth anniversary of Serbia’s mythic confrontation with its national destiny, that in that the - century battle, Serbia had defended not just herself but all of European culture and civilization. Fine oratory might even be called the elixir of national psychosis.

Mark B.
June 30th, 2008
2:06 AM
I wanted to thank all the participants in this discussion for the nature of their posts. This was a very educational discussion without the typical name calling that often results from angry responders. I learned a lot. And I have a lot more to learn. And want to thank you all for helping me understand more fully the complex issues of that region and the people. Many thanks, Mark U.S.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
More Dispatches
Popular Standpoint topics