You are here:   Blogs >Nick Cohen > So this is how it ends, is it?
Standpoint Blogs
 
 
Nick Cohen
Wednesday 31st March 2010
So this is how it ends, is it?

 The longest period of left-wing rule in British history is all but over. Guess how Labour MPs use their last few precious days in power. By comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable? By standing up for the one-million-strong army of young unemployed? By reforming a rotten City or performing one last service to the credulous and the idealistic who have supported them down the decades?

   Don't be so stupid. Don't be such a clown.

    The government proposed last night a cut in the fees libel lawyers can charge. A study by the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies at Oxford University showed that the cost of libel litigation in England and Wales is 140-times the European average. The current system so clearly limits freedom of expression by removing access to justice for journals, individuals and blogs that would be destroyed by a libel action, that even Jack Straw, no friend to English liberty, wants reform.

   But as Index on Censorship reports, his sensible measure came before Parliament and...

   A Statutory Instrument that would have reformed costs in English libel cases was stalled at committee stage tonight after several Labour MPs voted against their party whip to bock a reduction of lawyers' success fees from a 100 per cent mark-up to 10 per cent. Chris Mullin, Peter Kilfoyle, Tom Watson and Jim Sheridan and Conservative Julie Kirkbride acted against the move. Watson and Kilfoyle have both taken advantage of Conditional Fee Agreements in past court cases. Other Conservative MPs abstained from the vote.

When he was young, Mullin was an investigative journalist. Now he is working to maintain an oppressive system which allows post-Soviet oligarchs and Saudi petro-billionaires to come to Britain and punsih their  critics.

    Kilfoyle once posed as a left-winger. Now he is lining up behind the most reactionary elements in the English legal system 

   Watson claimed to be a supporter of British science and technology. Now he defends an indefensible law which has led to the hounding of Simon Singh, Peter Wilmshurst  and Henrik Thomsen - better and braver men than he will ever be - who faced personal ruin for standing up for free scientific debate.

    How does Labour end? Well now you know. It ends with Labour MPs breaking the whip so they can by fight in the last ditch to defend the exorbitant fees of extortionist lawyers.

Tags:
 
Like this article? Share, save or print using the icons below
Delicious   Digg   StumbleUpon   Propeller   Reddit   Magnoliacom   Newsvine   Furl   Facebook   Google   Yahoo   Technorati   Icerocket   Print   Mail   Twitter   
Share/Save
 
 
 
Tom Watson
April 1st, 2010
8:04 PM
Angry man Nick has not bothered to investigate why we opposed the proposition. Contrary to his knee-jerk, ill-informed and poorly researched response suggests, I am in favour of wholesale and radical reform of libel laws. An more detailed explanation can be found here: http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/31/why-i-opposed-libel-costs-reform...

Anonymous
March 31st, 2010
4:03 PM
If you want informed comment rather than a rant watch the actual debate- rather interesting- if you can be bothered http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Main/Player.aspx?meetingId=6276. You'll see it is about access to justice. Simon Singh would not have been able to defend himself had it not been for a CFA - not that you will ever find that out by reading anything written in the mainstream press about this subject. Vested interestst anyone...trebles all round...

Andy
March 31st, 2010
1:03 PM
He's not indicting the Government, he's indicting the Labour MPs. They're a sorry lot, they always have been.

Anon
March 31st, 2010
12:03 PM
I've heard of Bush Derangement Syndrome - Nick clearly suffers from Brown Derenagement Syndrome.

Anonymous
March 31st, 2010
11:03 AM
So have I got this straight - a Labour government puts forward a measure that Nick Cohen approves of. A few back bench Labour MPs - as well as Tory Julie Kirkbride - manage to block this measure through committee room shenanigans. And then Nick claims this is an indictment of the Labour governement - the governement which has proposed the measure of which Nick has approved. Come on, Nick, you may hate this government burt there is no need for you to lose all reason over it.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
 
About Nick Cohen

Nick Cohen is a columnist for the Observer. He is the author of Pretty Straight Guys, What's Left?, and Waiting for the Etonians. For more information and his previous blog, visit nickcohen.net

Recent Blog Posts
Blog List
More Posts
Popular Standpoint topics