Michael Burleigh
The Greatest Living Stalinist
Tuesday 28th October 2008
Shadow Education Secretary Michael Gove did us all a great service last week by drawing attention to the BBC's introductory laudations to 'our greatest living historian' Eric Hobsbawm as he claimed that all his prognostications had come true. He's the ghastly academic Stalinist who has inched his way up the Ruritanian ladder to a Companionship of Honour by giving the general impression (though not physically in 1936 in Spain) of right-on sentiments as well as books that seem remarkably dexterous on Chile, China or Venezuela for any one who knows nothing about them. Being the father of Sarah Brown's former business partner probably helped with that one. Last year I had the misfortune of being seated at a table opposite the professor at a dinner in honour of my friend Niall Ferguson. Hobby and I contrived not to exchange so much as a glance or a word as I eagerly scanned his face for evidence of the Reaper and recalled another dinner where some brave soul shouted out 'free Pinochet, jail Hobsbawm'. Had I been told of this seating plan, I'd have avoided the entire evening. The BBC's enthusiasm for Hobby is all the more bizarre since it was on a BBC programme, years ago, that he assented to interviewer Michael Ignatieff's proposition that had the 'noble dream' (lie) worked out in the Soviet Union, the deaths of twenty million people would have been justified in the end. Let's hope Michael Gove is equally attentive to the Marxisant clients and clones Hobby has helped place up and down British academia, who then go on to corrupt the sort of people recruited by the BBC.
6:06 pm
Print
COMMENTS
elberry
October 28th, 2008
9:10 PM
9:10 PM
You shouldn't shrink from such dinner engagements but regard them rather as opportunities to redress these villains' crimes with cutting remarks, cold glances, and perhaps even Hemingway-like drunken brawling, overturning the tables and roaring "bring me my elephant gun!" to your manservants (if you have manservants, i suspect you don't). i keep shaking my head at Appleyard every time he interviews someone famous and fails to commit an outrage, but i suppose that's why he's a famous journalist and i'm a typist.
MV
October 29th, 2008
11:10 AM
11:10 AM
Thought you might be interested in this laudatory article on Hobsbawm by marxist Perry Anderson:
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v24/n19/ande01_.html
Very "pro" but some interesting nuggets. Sorry to hear about the uncomfortable dinner.
Recusant
October 29th, 2008
1:10 PM
1:10 PM
An appalling man, I couldn't agree more, but I'm afraid we have probably lost any chance of convincing people to see that someone saying "I'm a communist" should be treated in the same manner as someone saying "I'm a Nazi/Fascist".
Would Prince Harry have got stick for wearing an NKVD uniform? Is having a Che poster on your wall cause for outrage in our fine universities?
mburleigh
October 29th, 2008
2:10 PM
2:10 PM
Actually years ago I also sat next to Hobby in my then barbers in Fitzrovia. We didn't exchange a word then either. My current barber, the estimable Roy the ex- merchant sailor of Manchester, would probably cut his throat, since he once vowed that he'd like to get behind the wheel of a steamroller to crush that 'Abu Hook Hamza'. I can't read Perry Anderson since I learned that a huge Northern Irish 'Ascendancy' fortune underpins his desire to tax people like me. A real salon-socialist, like Hobby himself.
Will
October 31st, 2008
3:10 PM
3:10 PM
One of the saddest--and most frustrating--things is that the likes of Hobsbawm and the soixante huitards dominate academe on both sides of the Atlantic. This is especially true of history. Since they set the agenda and determine what fields are serious, its very easy to marginalize those who don't play along. Nasty as boorish commedians may be, the hijacking of the humanities has caused much more damange. The gap between what people read or buy at bookshops and what the academy rewards is immense. It's hard to see a solution as these people have become self-replicating. Any thoughts?
mburleigh
November 1st, 2008
11:11 AM
11:11 AM
A purge. Seriously, the only thing that seems to work is either to fund little counter-cultural centres (as at Princeton) or to build up alternative capacity in thinktanks. Of course this problem is largely confined to the humanities. I doubt whether business studies, law, medicine, engineering and physical sciences are subject to the same group think.
elberry
November 2nd, 2008
5:11 PM
5:11 PM
i was talking to an ex-squaddie the other day, he told me he'd had one of those Sinn Fein bossses in his rifle sights 30-odd years ago, went on to relate the gunshot wounds his friends had taken in Nortern Ireland. One of his friends is permanently hooked up to a bag; the Sinn Fein boss is now earning more than Gordon Brown. Strange how terrorism pays, as does affiliation with revolutionary violence, as long as you pick the right kind, i.e. Uncle Joe over Hitler. My landlady - a genuinely decent woman, i should note - has a Che Guevara bag, i find myself wondering if i could get away with a Himmler bag in return. Did you know Himmler had a special occult teapot?
http://www.forteantimes.com/features/articles/127/himmlers_fortress_of_f...
Didn't do him any good, mind.
Will
November 2nd, 2008
9:11 PM
9:11 PM
I agree on the value of counter-cultural centers and think tanks. Multiculturalism is the default ideology in business these days--at least in the US where "diversity" remains king. It's even worse in colleges of education which seem to emphazied psychological techniques for adjusting anti-social outlooks developed in the home. Therpy supplants education as the project for schools. The functionalist assumptions behind applied science and business studies aren't so attuned to learning either. A lot of businessmen in the US think universities really exist to sustain athletic programs. Books and classes just get in the way of the real business of the place.
mburleigh
November 3rd, 2008
10:11 AM
10:11 AM
I thought the Yule lights he gave his subordinates to mark the winter solstice were bad enough Elberry. Did you see the Sinners out in force to throw rocks at our troops in Belfast?
Matt
November 6th, 2008
6:11 AM
6:11 AM
Hi, an American reader here. I've read some of the things that Mr. Burleigh and the estimable Robert Conquest have written about Hobsbawm, but I also remember Conquest stating that some of his early work has merits. I purchased an old paperback copy of The Age of Revolution a while ago in a bookstore. Anyone care to tell me whether or not it's worth my time?
mburleigh
November 8th, 2008
3:11 PM
3:11 PM
Welcome Matt. I'd try any of the books by the late Francois Furet instead. There's also a superb French historian at Harvard whose name momentarily escapes me. You are entirely correct about Mr Conquest's view of Hobsbawm.
Matt
November 11th, 2008
6:11 AM
6:11 AM
Thank you for the recommendation. Are there any particular books by Mr. Furet covering roughly the same period as the Hobsbawm book? I know that Furet wrote The Passing of an Illusion, which I've heard was a nice takedown of folks like Hobsbawm.
mburleigh
November 14th, 2008
5:11 PM
5:11 PM
Yes that's a modern classic. Apart from his specialised books on the Revolution, I think he wrote larger histories of France. The British historian Tim Blanning is pretty good on that period too I am told. I recall the Fontana history of modern France series is great, ditto William Doyle on the Revolution.
