You are here:   Columns >  On the Contrary > Euro Gonner!
 
Euro Gonner!
July/August 2012

I doubt that many of my American compatriots would understand it: the loathing for the European elite that has gathered in Britain after years of unaccountable, anti-democratic, profligate, condescending, contemptuous, haughty, sanctimonious, and petty — have I left out any adjectives? — high-handedness from Brussels. Those of my ilk who scream, "DIE, EURO, DIE!" at their TV screens have every sympathy for the eurozone's peoples, fellow victims of the same patronising know-it-alls at the top. But the euro has become the supreme icon of all we despise about the EU. Formed by fiat through the Maastricht Treaty, its adoption not put to popular votes, the currency emblemises the EU's refusal to involve the sorry little serfs in decisions that may affect their lives but that are far too important for the tiny nobodies to control. Since the whole project never made the slightest economic sense, the euro is also an emblem of hubris.  Thus for its vainglorious creators to be forced to watch their pet currency go down in flames seems the perfect punishment.

Granted, I am of the sensible, supportable view that either a euro demise or a membership contraction would benefit the European periphery, if not everyone, in the long term. But given the potentially horrific destabilisation on the way to this sunnier day, perhaps it's fortunate that whatever heh-heh-heh I indulge in front of Newsnight has no effect on events.

Of course, there's a second driver of die-euro-die!, which any novelist should recognise: narrative appetite. Most of the time, news is entertainment, and we can easily get what's good for a story and what's good for real life confused — that is, we sometimes insist that reality comply with the rules of fiction. After following this tale for a good two years, we hunger for a climax. Suppose that, after all the nail-biting build-up over a "Grexit" or a "Spexit", all the talk of national bankruptcies and social upheaval or even breakdown, the powers-that-be get their acts together and suddenly it's, "Oh, well, I guess that's sorted." What a crap story. We've been watching a disaster movie, and, damn it, we want our disaster.  

But disasters are more thrilling in the audience than on the other side of the screen. So I probably wouldn't like it, the real thing; I certainly wouldn't relish the proper depression that some forecast would follow a euro self-destruct. Besides, the last people punished would be the EU elite, who'd ride out the misery in style, sipping champagne and nibbling canapés — egg, perhaps, the better to get it on face. Eurocratic humiliation would be the single upside to the crisis, and almost worth the sacrifice.

 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Philip Arlington
July 25th, 2012
2:07 AM
I suspect that your refusal to accept that the collapse of the Euro is desirable, even though you acknowledge both the rational and the emotional reasons for desiring it to collapse, is a manifestation of the refusal of modern Westerners to acknowledge that suffering is a necessary part of life. Yes, the price of the collapse might be high (though probably not as great as the scaremongers would have it), but as it is a necessary precondition for the survival of the democracies of the nation states of Europe, it would be worth it. The cost of resisting Hitler was also high, and also worth it. Think of the short term suffering as the price of preserving democracy and national freedom in the long term and it no longer seems disproportionate.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.