You are here:   Environment > ONLINE ONLY: Overpopulation and the Reality of Grandchildren
 

The optimistic scenario is that world population will level out at around 10 billion some time around the middle of this century. But I wouldn't bank on it. The birth rate equation is fertility multiplied by fecundity, where fertility is the number of women of childbearing age and fecundity is their propensity to have children. Unprecedented disasters apart, fertility is very easily predictable in the medium term and is, of course, rising steadily. Fecundity has proved very unpredictable, the consequence of a myriad of factors including religion and fashion. In any case, the embourgeoisement thesis suggests that people will trade babies for cars and central heating. Which means, of course, that if man-made climate change is the problem which it is now assumed to be, there is nothing we can do about it unless we can attack not just overpopulation in the abstract, but the level of increase which is currently considered inevitable.

The idea that more people is a bad thing is very difficult to accommodate in moral philosophy. I drafted this essay with one granddaughter pottering in the background, playing and talking to herself in a way that I can only describe as endearing and another leaning on my knee and smiling up at me in a way I can only describe as lovable. The idea that I might sacrifice their existence for the benefit of some unknown members of my species in a hundred or a thousand years time is absurd. I do not care about the long-term future of my species, but about the two little girls: "caring" at that level of abstraction is neither rational nor rooted in natural sympathy.

So, here is the solution: a strain of viral pneumonia which spreads aggressively and wipes out 80 per cent of the population, leaving us at Ehrlich's "acceptable" level of 1.5 billion people. Like an elephant cull it tends to follow genetic patterns of immunity, wiping out whole families, but leaving other families intact. It tends to hit the weak, in Darwinian terms. Go with it? Open the container? Nobody said saving the planet was going to be nice!

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Vera Lustig
June 18th, 2013
6:06 PM
According to Allison, I must be "psychopathological": I find overcrowded streets and transport systems unpleasant and even threatening. There is for me something threatening about huge crowds. To put it in perspective, I don't begrudge Allison his/her adorable granddaughters, and I find China's sadistically enforced one-child policy utterly repugnant. BUT, as "Anonymous", above, points out, we have made inroads into our planet's resources. Even damp South-East England has annual water shortages, and we are never more than a few days away from food shortages. Appealing to people to use less water/eat less meat isn't going to work. There is a global problem of youth unemployment, which isn't I believe, cyclical. Rather, it's the shape of things to come. Some countries' leaders (Iran, Russia,Chile) are anxious about decreasing fertility. The Chilean president is offering cash incentives to families to encourage them to have larger families. Meanwhile, in Spain, youth unemployment is above 50%. So, instead of putting yet more people on our planet, why don't the Chileans welcome their fellow Spanish-speakers to come over and work? Movement of labour is the answer to shortages of workers.

Anonymous
June 15th, 2013
8:06 PM
It is certainly true that human population cannot grow indefinitely century after century, until there is standing room only. There will be scientific advances and technical innovations. But does anyone want the whole globe covered in adjoining cities? Long before that we will have run out of food and fresh water. We do not know when overpopulation will become a significant global problem (as it already is in some countries), but the idea, propagated by some, that it could never be a problem is ridiculous. We live on a finite planet with finite resources, and we are already destroying the natural environment upon which all life, including human life, depends. Urban based politicians and business leaders seem incapable of understanding this basic fact about human existence on Earth.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.