You are here:   Columns >  Open Season > Worst for Women
 

It is no surprise that the minister tasked with representing the views and needs of women in the country also appears to have no clue as to the most basic issues affecting them. Equalities minister Lynne Featherstone is known to be gaffe-prone, and yet is one of the most senior women in the party. 

At a women's hustings in 2010 Featherstone appeared on the panel alongside former Solicitor General Vera Baird QC and Home Secretary Theresa May. When a young woman in the packed audience asked Featherstone to explain the apparent contradiction between claiming to be a party that hates the sexualisation of young women and accepting Anna Arrowsmith, a director of pornographic films, as a candidate in the general election (her best known film is Where's the Rent Boys?) Featherstone replied: "There's nothing wrong with sex." 

Baird, a feminist, has no time for Featherstone or her party. "Lib Dems are not reformers but laissez-faire," she says, "hence they won't do anything artificially to increase the number of women MPs. They have little to no understanding of institutionalised discrimination and are far more concerned with the rights of the individual man than anything else."

Despite having launched the "Body Confidence" project last year, a campaign to challenge the pressure placed on girls and women to conform to a perfect body image, Featherstone was recently quoted in a newspaper interview as saying that there could sometimes be a good rationale for plastic surgery — "when you've had five children and your breasts are hanging around your waist".

The Lib Dems cannot sustain a concept of equality that is anywhere near robust enough to eliminate women's subordination in both the public and private domains. Days after the formation of the coalition government in 2010 it was announced that men accused of rape in England and Wales would be granted anonymity. The Lib Dems first voted for the proposal in 2006, but it did not feature in either the Lib Dem or the Conservative manifestos. It was widely criticised by anti-rape campaigners, who considered it a disgrace that the one policy relating to sexual violence was aimed at helping the accused and not the victims, and would boost the widely held belief that most women who report rape are lying. Fortunately the plan was dropped only weeks later. 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Anonymous
May 2nd, 2012
1:05 PM
"the men, who let's face it, can't exactly be entirely happy with their lives" Wow. What a classic example of the idiotic 'But what about the poor MEN?' response to any article about women's rights. We're not talking about women being unhappy with their lives. We're talking about them being abused, raped, objectified, mutilated, exploited and murdered. Get a grip, Hugh.

Hugh
April 5th, 2012
3:04 PM
Tough law! Yes, Julie, tough law. What young women really need is to be criminalised and stigmatised for their career choices. Similarly, the men, who let's face it, can't exactly be entirely happy with their lives, let's criminalise and stigmatise them too. That's really beneficial to society as a whole, isn't it? Well, no, actually, I don't think it is. Paying for sex and accepting payment for sex is legal. The legal profession hasn't seen fit to make it illegal and I'm sure it would have if there were the slightest excuse. There isn't. What is truly harmful to men, women and society is unnecessarily criminalising people and, in so doing, ruining their lives. It seems that the author positively in favour of continuing with these failed policies and, indeed, making them even more oppressive. She is, in fact, in favour of causing the kind of damage, and worse, that she claims to be fighting. I hope she is merely naive, unable to understand the consequences of her demands and not ideologically in favour of actively harming people.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.