You are here:   Reputations >  Overrated > Overrated: Russell Brand
 
Television has been as negligent. I would not mind the airtime the broadcasters on BBC Newsnight and Start the Week have given Brand if its interviewers had presented him with the same detailed, contemptuous questions they fire at politicians. Instead, they revealed a dismal double standard.

Broadcasters, print journalists and the ever-growing army of voyeurs on social media have cramped the space for conventional politics. They turn minor mistakes or jokes into "gaffes" — Freudian slips that allegedly reveal a politician's true perverted ideas, although more often than not they reveal nothing at all. A gaffe will have a "gate" added to it within seconds and will fill the news schedules for 36 hours. All forms of news media pay obsessive attention to the character and faults of party leaders, which ignores the collective nature of governments in parliamentary democracies. (Whether a man is "strong" or "gets it" is a simple story the viewers can grasp, they reason, as they elevate a pale 21st-century version of the Führerprinzip.) They refuse to let politicians speak at length without interruption — and then, without a blush of shame, complain that politicians speak in soundbites. They treat disagreements as "splits" — regardless of whether they are or not — and complain, again unblushingly, that politicians have become boring.

To try to keep an audience, which understandably has lost interest, television fills the hole where politics ought to be with celebrities, usually comedians, or "refreshing" politicians such as George Galloway and Nigel Farage. Broadcasters never apply to them the standards they apply to conventional politicians.

They do not mind that your average comedian on Have I Got News for You has no ideas beyond one-liners or that Galloway and Farage are ugly extremists. They are outrageous and "fun" and can hold the wavering audience's attention. Newsnight, a supposedly serious current affairs programme, never exposed Russell Brand. Nor did it wish to. Like an old man swallowing Viagra, it wanted him to boost its limp ratings and revive its flagging appeal. You can hide on a television show, but you cannot hide in a 100,000-word book. If your thought is vacuous, it will reveal your vacuity, however much gibbering you deploy to conceal it.

Revolution
is so bad it has finished Brand's political career, such as it was. But  he will move on and the celebrity system which puffed him up will remain: anti-intellectual, anti-democratic because it shuts out real argument, incurious and dishonest. No good can come from it for Left or Right.
View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
amcdonald
January 27th, 2015
4:01 PM
Russell Brand has said he`d vote for Syriza so that`s now clear. Only the Green Party welcomes the Syriza victory. Cameron and Red Ed still clinging to austerity,recycling money to the rich and `fiscal waterboarding` the rest of the nation. No wonder the restored `beheaded` 8`, 4 ton marble statue of Mrs Thatcher has been shoved into an obscure corridor at Guildhall,London. 24hr CCTV surveillance and you need a Guildhall security guard to accompany you to see it in all it`s spotlit quotidian dreariness. As Syriza has formed an alliance with the Greek Independents Party so Labour can form an alliance with the Green Party.(The actual Greek Communist Party got hardly any votes.) The Tory Party `demoting` Louise Mensch and Michael Gove has suicided intellectually. Voting for a semi-islamified Conservative Party ? A complete waste of time. Watch them pour all their £millions down the drain in their election campaigning. It`s the only talent they`ve got left.

amcdonald
January 18th, 2015
6:01 PM
How To Start A Revolution is the title of the book by Nadya and Maria from the Pussy Riot art group to be published later in 2015. Bez (ex-Happy Mondays band/winner of tv jungle show)) has launched the Reality Party in Salford,Manchester. Cameron`s support for the cocaine drug-wrecked casino city bankers has destroyed the Tory Party . They`ve become a rent-a- useful idiots agency. Adam Curtis has it down to a "static culture" and a "zombie culture". On the front page of the Independent online a tearful little girl asks the Pope why God allows little girls to be forced into prostitution. He admits he doesn`t know. He can`t tell the difference between Charlie Hebdo cartoons and insulting his mother either. He`d punch anyone who insulted his mother. But he`d forgive the murderers,rapists,beheaders and crucifiers ? Not much of a self-education advocate is he? At least the Medici mafia Popes helped create Michelangelo`s and Raphael`s masterpieces. Today ? Absolutely nothing. Ditto Islam and Protestantism. Zizek`s book Less Than Nothing sells well for philosophy. In the best art the natural,modern and the supernatural co-exist and co-create .

Anonymous
January 7th, 2015
2:01 AM
Russell Brand is the perfect vehicle to enable the further castigation of the working class - in one sense learning the power of language is too dangerous an achievement - yet he remains tickled by the 'Guardian' and other onanistically orientated nodal points of expression. The history and legacy of working class auto-didacticism is,therefore, neutered, by those who profess to represent the interests of the downtrodden and dispossessed. Still, everyone needs a puppet and he sells publications....eh Standpoint?

JamesG
December 22nd, 2014
11:12 PM
He may be dry and drug free but his behavior says "I am not sober." Any successful recovery program involves ego-deflation (just read AAs 12 steps) and if the addict skips that part and assumes dryness equals sobriety he is inviting an eventual relapse.

amcdonald
December 10th, 2014
11:12 PM
Last year Will Self wrote in praise of situationist Guy Debord`s book `The Society of the Spectacle`. As yet WS has yet to `drift` pychogeographically into Mayday Rooms,88 Fleet St,London. Brand and Cohen don`t mention it either. The philosopher Zizek reminds us that the revolution must strike twice. Socialism for the rich and capitalism for everyone else is the necessary (and present) failure of the first revolution of both. Reformist human rights were established and cultural and scientific advances were also made. If Cohen,Self and Brand could co-author the book `The 2nd Revolution` there`s a nice roof garden and café with rooms for research and international networking at 88 Fleet St.

HY
December 9th, 2014
11:12 AM
Your friend might equally well have asked if there was any chance of you turning into a real journalist.

windter
December 8th, 2014
10:12 AM
Added to that, I'd not noticed Nick Cohen attacking Brand because he "would not be able to write until he had mastered the skills of self-criticism and fact-checking". Oh my. This from the Nick Cohen who repeatedly praised Hassan Butt in print - a man who admitted in court to being a serial liar who told people what they wanted to hear - and who Cohen has never mentioned again (so much for self-criticism). The same Nick Cohen who also repeatedly praised Ahmed Chalabi in print, only to go suddenly silent on him when it became clear - as indeed it was always clear to people who didn't lap up his propaganda - that he was a fraudster (so much for self-criticism). The same Nick Cohen who nowadays berates others for their belief in the MMR/autism link - but who also paid for separate shots back in the day as he was also taken in, yet never mentions this when returning to the topic now (so much for self-criticism). The same Nick Cohen who claims to have 'read Chomsky' but has actually only read one paragraph of Chomsky, which he saw via Twitter (so much for fact-checking). The same Nick Cohen who regularly berates Judith Butler for the incoherence of her prose, always using the same example - which is mistranscribed - because he goes for his 'intellectual debate' to press releases, seeing as he's so averse to checking his own facts (so much for fact-checking). And I could go on. But is it worth it - or is it not clear that Cohen is no paragon of writerly virtue and that he is about the least appropriate person to berate others for the low standards of their research and writing?

windter
December 5th, 2014
9:12 AM
It's all well and good berating 'the media' and 'society' for liking its politics infused with celebrity, but Nick Cohen's completely guilty of this as well - preferring TV historians like Dominic Sandbrook and comedians like john O'Farrell to actual, proper historians, preferring PR people like Kate Fox to actual sociologists, and praising comedians like Dara O'Braian as the true heroes of British free speech (when he isn't insulting the exact same comedians, of course). But - crucially - the actual proof of cohen's commitment to true intellectual debate comes from his own fixation on Brand (bear in mind this is the second piece he's written on Brand in a month). If Cohen was actually interested in serious debate, he'd be writing articles about actual 'intellectuals'. But he knows what sells - celebrity - and specifically, he knows what his agein, right-wing readers want, which is attacks on figures that young people like (i.e. Brand). He's as guilty as anyone else.

SJ
December 1st, 2014
9:12 AM
All pretty good stuff until you started equating Farage with Galloway. You media people really do hate ordinary English people.

observer
November 30th, 2014
1:11 PM
Hmmm... Mike. Never mind the "cowardly". Why doesn't Brand's assertion that "we dismantle our environment due to the materialistic, pessimistic principles that the atheistic tyranny of the day is tacitly sponsoring" strike you as "untrue at all"? Could it be that a few sloganistic anti-establishment assertions (however muddled) when uttered by a professional "rebel" will always get a thumbs up from those who like to think of themselves as independent minded. Our educated classes love a rebel. Our not-so-educated classes love a comedian and a few sneering HIGNFY one liners are all the political comment they need or want.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.