You are here:   Columns >  Points East & West > Where is the Cavalry?
 
Therein lies the greatest geopolitical change since 1941 — the year that America joined the war and by extension accepted the role of superpower and the leadership of the free world. Rightly or wrongly, most of America's allies, and countries and people who look up to America, now fear that they will not be rescued.

America has abandoned the Iranian people who clamoured for freedom in 2009; instead it is negotiating with their oppressors.

Barack Obama has told the world that Syria's brutish dictator, Bashar al-Assad, must go. Yet everybody knows that, as far as America is concerned, Assad will still be in office when Obama goes off to build his presidential library in 2017.

America has allowed Russia back into the Middle East, after successfully evicting the Soviet Union and keeping it at bay for four decades. It has handed Russia and Iran a victory in Syria by choosing not to fight. It appears to have done the same in the Black Sea, where multilateral diplomacy is no substitute for projecting superpower muscle. It will now preside over the dismemberment of Ukraine, content with sanctions and the occasional complaint that Russia needs "to de-escalate" and stop behaving in a 19th-century manner.

All this is disheartening and dangerous. When cops leave the street to thugs, two things always happen. Those who are vulnerable prevaricate, while the others take the law into their own hands. In international politics, this means that those who are weak and vulnerable will come to terms with the new neighbourhood bullies — the Gulf principalities may seek accommodation with Iran, for example. But others will conclude that they have to fend for themselves. If America can't prevent a nuclear Iran, what's to stop Israel or Saudi Arabia ignoring America's pleas and acting unilaterally?

Nothing. And as its retreat from the role of global policeman allows the world to descend slowly into chaos, America will reap the whirlwind.
View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
yuval Brandstetter MD
June 1st, 2014
7:06 AM
This author is acting as if Obama's enunciated foreign policy is new. Its is not. It was there from the beginning, focusing on relegating America to a regional power, of the same order as Iran. If Iran could use this time to become Nuclear, all the better, because Islam's first order of business is the annihilation of Israel. Obama's foreign policy is in fact the generalization of its Israel policy. Israel was supposed to never rely on the cavalry, regardless of the overwhelming threat. Now its the free world which has become Israel - unaided against Jihad and its supporters

Ignim Brites
May 31st, 2014
11:05 PM
Dr. Ottolenghi's fails to take into account the intensity of the divisions within US that were exposed during the Iraq war. It's those divisions that will keep the US's role in the world muted for next several decades.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.