You are here:   Columns >  Points East & West > Where is the Cavalry?
 

Barack Obama: leading from behind?

In 1999, the French foreign minister Hubert Védrine complained about American "hyperpower", echoing the New Left's genetic disdain for America's unchallenged role in the world. Now, where has America gone?

A dictator on the loose in Libya? Lead from behind. Another one intent on genocide in Syria? Send the UN. An Islamist insurgency in Mali? Send the French. Mass kidnappings of school girls in Nigeria? Send a hashtag. A brutal fascist repression of human rights and democracy activists in Venezuela? Send nothing. Ukraine? Apply a few sanctions, but forget about those defensive weapons or intelligence sharing. The South China Sea? De-escalate please. Genocide in Africa? A problem from hell — but who are we to fix it? Iran? Negotiate, even if you know they have cheated, are cheating and will cheat. Adversaries? Make nice. Enemies? Make nicer. Friends — don't embarrass America please. Or else.

Complain if you must about America's resolve and ability to project power and intervene globally, but a world without an American cop is not that orderly, it turns out. For with no cops in sight, the criminals are having a party.

Americans may shrug — they gave blood and money to a decade of wars that proved inconclusive. Why give more of both to far-away places whose problems are not America's doing? The world is too messy to even begin to comprehend it. Why try to fix it? Why can't others step up to the plate? Ukraine is, first and foremost, a European problem, after all. If the Nigerian government cannot find more than 200 missing school girls in its own country, how can America make a difference? And all those confusing conflicts — in South Sudan, in the Central African Republic, even in Syria: no one seems a better alternative than the present ruler. No one is nice. Remember Somalia? Just stay out of it.

There is something of a hardnosed, streetwise, common-sense realism in this notion, a recognition, perhaps, of America's limits; a surrender to the constraints of human power; a humble acceptance that fate, sometimes, is out of the reach and control of even the most powerful. But then again, it isn't really.

America kept a world largely in order, shielded allies, and intimidated adversaries almost without having to pull the trigger. That was possible because those who looked to America for friendship, protection and support believed it would come to their rescue if needed. And those who hated America and everything it stood for similarly believed that America would exact retribution if they dared cross red lines.

Occasionally, America had to remind them it meant business. Those actions reinforced its allies and their confidence in America. The cavalry, they thought, would turn up eventually.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
yuval Brandstetter MD
June 1st, 2014
7:06 AM
This author is acting as if Obama's enunciated foreign policy is new. Its is not. It was there from the beginning, focusing on relegating America to a regional power, of the same order as Iran. If Iran could use this time to become Nuclear, all the better, because Islam's first order of business is the annihilation of Israel. Obama's foreign policy is in fact the generalization of its Israel policy. Israel was supposed to never rely on the cavalry, regardless of the overwhelming threat. Now its the free world which has become Israel - unaided against Jihad and its supporters

Ignim Brites
May 31st, 2014
11:05 PM
Dr. Ottolenghi's fails to take into account the intensity of the divisions within US that were exposed during the Iraq war. It's those divisions that will keep the US's role in the world muted for next several decades.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.