You are here:   Civilisation >  Books > Revolutionary Passions
 
Winegarten underlines her eccentricities — she was immensely emotional and self-dramatising, and a compulsive talker — but also her sterling qualities. Her courage and generosity were remarkable. During one of the French Revolution’s most ghastly episodes, the September massacres, she hid several fugitive friends in her home. Briefly taken into custody, she was almost killed by the crowd on the steps of the Hotel de Ville. As she later recalled, “A man aimed his pike at me … if I had fallen down at that moment my life would have been over.”

Mme de Staël’s courage was undimmed a decade later when she defied Napoleon, who had swiftly decided that both her writings and the brilliant Parisian salon she hosted were subversive. Winegarten is perceptive on the hostility Mme de Staël’s rare position as an independent female public figure aroused throughout her life, and from Napoleon in particular. In 1803 he banished her from the capital city. In 1810 he sent his ­minister of police, General Savary — a sinister figure with an uncanny resemblance to Dick Cheney — to confiscate her masterpiece, De l’Allemagne.

Constant’s reputation as a major liberal thinker has recently been revived, but he remains less familiar than Mme de Staël to a general readership. In many ways, he was quite as remarkable as her, although morally considerably less attractive. He was devouringly ambitious, frequently inconsistent, lecherous and a compulsive gambler. Politically, he moved from Jacobin sympathiser during the Revolution, to liberal dissident alongside Mme de Staël under the Napoleonic regime. He came near to ruining his reputation during the Hundred Days. Having compared Napoleon to Attila and Genghis Khan in March 1815, the very next month he rallied to the returning Emperor, ostensibly on a promise that henceforth liberty would be ­respected, but more probably through sheer opportunism. Yet he did make amends after Waterloo, emerging as a parliamentary champion of the poor, who were confronted by the rapacious capitalism of France’s expanding industrial and banking dynasties.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.