You are here:   Columns >  The Outsider's Diary >
 
August 2008

Leading the effort is the former political editor of The Spectator, Peter Oborne, whose Channel 4 programme, It Shouldn’t Happen to a Muslim was the catalyst for the minister’s comments. You couldn’t ask for a better demonstration of the confusion that has befallen British debate today than to look at the story which appeared alongside Malik’s intervention. For on the same day Lord Phillips, the Lord Chief Justice, was quoted across the press explaining why the Archbishop (or Grand Mufti) of Canterbury had been right to argue last February for elements of Sharia to be incorporated into British law. Thus on the same day that we see a serious advance in the fight for accommodation of Islamic law into Britain, a prominent Muslim claims that British Muslims are living through a period of Nazi-paralleled intolerance. While gaining new rights prominent Muslims compare themselves to people who were stripped of all rights. Nice work.

The central argument of Oborne’s programme was that many stories in the press about Muslims are not true and that those that are don’t portray Muslims in a positive enough light. It’s hard to know how you would report most of these stories in a positive light. But put that aside for a moment and let’s just look at the evidence that many stories about Muslims in Britain are made up.

Channel 4 showed that a claim by The Sun that a Muslim gang attacked a soldier’s house in Windsor was almost certainly baseless. What is not baseless is that in January four Muslim men pleaded guilty to attempting to kidnap a British Muslim soldier in Birmingham and behead him “like a pig”.

Channel 4 showed that a February 2008 Sun allegation that some Muslim medical students were refusing to scrub properly was baseless. What is not baseless is that in September last year Dr Omer Butt was admonished by the General Dental Council for refusing to treat a Muslim patient unless she wore a headscarf. For sure, certain stories have been under-sourced and over-hyped and I’m surprised that a hack could be surprised at such a trend in hackery. But for every such dubious story many true and resonant stories exist.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
R.Taus
August 7th, 2008
12:08 AM
Who would have thought it? A Jihad enabler practicing the Islamic doctorine of Taqiyya and Kitman jumping down the throat of anyone who is brave enough to delineate the Jihadist agenda. Islam is not a religion as we infidels understand the term. It is a political system, fascist, expansionist, totalitarian and anti-human. Indeed Mohammedanism is by far the more apt title, for it is a cult. This is especially apparent when one looks at the incipit of this movement as it were. The Koran, the Hadith and the Sunnah make it all too clear that unlike the Judaeo-Christian tradition it is Mohammed rather than G-d's word or commmandments who has ascendancy in the narrative. Even a cursory glance at the Seerah will demonstrate that the example of the prophet of Islam, the ASWA AL HASANA which a Muslim male is mandated to follow in all aspects of life is sufficient in itself to strike terror within the hearts of all of us Kuffar. Mr. Murray has had the temerity to grasp and disseminate the truth of this 1400 year old agenda towards world domination albeit within the context of these post 9/11 times; something the Dhimmi elite would much rather not have discussed or debated...which suits the `Inayats of this world to a T. Distressingly though for the latter certain coloured women know better.

inayat
August 2nd, 2008
8:08 PM
'New rights'? Nonsense. Lord Phillips made clear in his speech that it was the existing Alternative Dispute Mechanism which English common law already allows for which means that two people can agree to go voluntarily for arbitration to a third party (be it a Shari'ah council or an Orthodox Jewish Beth Din court or whatever) to resolve their civil disputes. Douglas Murray talking hysterically once again about Muslims? Who would have thought it? http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/31/religion.race

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.