You are here:   Columns >  The Outsider's Diary >
 
August 2008

What is happening here is a deliberate and damaging shift. There is now a concerted effort to delegitimise factual analysis and reporting of Islam and ignore the justifications for their actions that some of its adherents actually explain. It centres on a single word.

The term “Islamophobia” is a crock for two reasons. The first is the fact that it is a deliberate attempt to conflate criticism of a belief-system with hatred of a people for the colour of their skin. Thus “Islamophobia” is neatly allied with the real horrors of racism.

But “Islamophobia” is also a nonsense term – though this is a far less popular aspect to point out – because a “phobia” is an “irrational fear”. “Claustrophobia” is irrational because enclosed spaces tend not to kill you. Being scared of small rooms is irrational. Exaggerated and faked stories abound in journalism. But despite this, and as a mounting death-toll asserts, there are a considerable number of reasons to be fearful of some – though certainly not all – aspects and versions of Islam. Women, gay men and Jews have particular reason to be fearful. As do commuters in major European cities and continental film-directors. It’s not “phobic” to be worried about Islam. It is eminently rational.

But to think that the answer to any criticism of Islam or Muslims is a delegitimising of critics and an indulgence in self-pity is not to make an advance. It is to pave the way for self-harm. For all of us.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
R.Taus
August 7th, 2008
12:08 AM
Who would have thought it? A Jihad enabler practicing the Islamic doctorine of Taqiyya and Kitman jumping down the throat of anyone who is brave enough to delineate the Jihadist agenda. Islam is not a religion as we infidels understand the term. It is a political system, fascist, expansionist, totalitarian and anti-human. Indeed Mohammedanism is by far the more apt title, for it is a cult. This is especially apparent when one looks at the incipit of this movement as it were. The Koran, the Hadith and the Sunnah make it all too clear that unlike the Judaeo-Christian tradition it is Mohammed rather than G-d's word or commmandments who has ascendancy in the narrative. Even a cursory glance at the Seerah will demonstrate that the example of the prophet of Islam, the ASWA AL HASANA which a Muslim male is mandated to follow in all aspects of life is sufficient in itself to strike terror within the hearts of all of us Kuffar. Mr. Murray has had the temerity to grasp and disseminate the truth of this 1400 year old agenda towards world domination albeit within the context of these post 9/11 times; something the Dhimmi elite would much rather not have discussed or debated...which suits the `Inayats of this world to a T. Distressingly though for the latter certain coloured women know better.

inayat
August 2nd, 2008
8:08 PM
'New rights'? Nonsense. Lord Phillips made clear in his speech that it was the existing Alternative Dispute Mechanism which English common law already allows for which means that two people can agree to go voluntarily for arbitration to a third party (be it a Shari'ah council or an Orthodox Jewish Beth Din court or whatever) to resolve their civil disputes. Douglas Murray talking hysterically once again about Muslims? Who would have thought it? http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/31/religion.race

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.