You are here:   Columns >  The Outsider's Diary >
 
July 2008

But beneath all this is the sad knowledge that the Conservative Party probably will stride into office on ground it never fought for before. After all, Boris Johnson managed it in London. Some of us sat in agony through the Mayoral debates as Mr Johnson espoused his passion for issues he’d never written about when he had the opportunity, but which his party knew would flatter the electorate rather than challenge them. The party machine has learnt from this. And so we will be able to look forward to more talk of making Britain “greener” and more of the “we're all in this together” and the meaningless “we won’t allow anyone to be left behind.”

Like Barack Obama in the States, there is enough Prozac in the Cameron clichés to keep the party going. But what do they even mean? President Bush and Donald Rumsfeld were repeatedly put through the wringers for spouting gobbledegook, but even Bush’s most garbled phrase was not as question-begging as the average phrase from Mr Cameron.

Aside from his Blair-like habit of talking to the electorate as though it’s the first time they have heard English spoken, the Conservative leader’s statements seem more than a branding exercise: they demonstrate a rejection of basic conservative thinking. Two years ago Mr Cameron told a Google-organised conference that: “It's time we admitted that there's more to life than money.” I’m not sure that anyone who isn’t a politician ever had to “admit” that, but I am happy to admit that I’m not sure what Mr Cameron intends to do for me when he talks of the importance “above all [of] the strength of our relationships.”

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Richard
July 8th, 2008
5:07 PM
Thanks, Douglas, for a very interesting article from the other side of the political pond. I have been starting to advocate a smaller state approach for the Labour Party, but I doubt I'll get anything more than abuse. Too many sectional interests.

Charles Brickdale
July 4th, 2008
9:07 AM
On education the Conservatives have a policy which represents, potentially, the beginnings of a serious challenge to the hegemony (yes, very Gramscian) over their most powerful means of transmitting their ideology and obsessions to the young. Gove's approach is not radical enough, yet, but is a move in the right direction; for one thing, it implicitly threatens the statist consensus in education. Who else, who is edging towards power, has such a policy on which future governments could build? It ain't wonderful but, thanks to David Davis' defeat in the leadership election, it is the best we are going to get for the foreseeable future. Until the Right revives and produces a credible leader and strategy for disseminating its ideas what do we do - leave the field to Brown, Balls and the LibDems?

Hamish Carlisle
July 2nd, 2008
8:07 PM
It is a worry, but there are still swathes of supposedly educated people who seem incurably infected with various forms of political correctness. Perhaps after the victory of the ersatz conservatives we can have them all sent to North Korea for decontamination classes?

Anonymous
June 30th, 2008
2:06 AM
Honestly, what is the difference between the Tories and Labour?! Thanks for the laugh Mr Murray, as long as "Dave" is around you won't run out of material.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.