You are here:   Text > The Truth About the Historical Jesus
 

In behaving as he did, Jesus conformed to a pattern of charismatic behaviour attested among Jews throughout the ages and down to his own time. The Biblical prophets Elisha, Elijah and Isaiah are credited with miraculous healings and resuscitations. Similar phenomena are ascribed in rabbinic literature to holy men living in the age close to the New ­Testament.

Honi in the 1st century BC and the Galilean Hanina ben Dosa in the 1st century AD were renowned for their miraculous rain-making power; Hanina’s fame also comprised healing, including healing from a distance like Jesus, and general wonderworking. Flavius Josephus (AD 37–c.100) reports not only on thaumaturgists of Old Testament vintage, such as Elisha, but explicitly mentions Honi, whose wondrous intervention ended a disastrous drought shortly before Pompey’s capture of Jerusalem in 63 BC. He also refers to Jesus in the days of Pontius Pilate and calls him a “wise man and performer of astonishing or paradoxical deeds”.

The reliability of Josephus’s notice about Jesus was rejected by many in the 19th and early 20th centuries, but it has been judged partly genuine and partly falsified by the majority of more recent critics. The Jesus portrait of Josephus, drawn by an uninvolved witness, stands halfway between the fully sympathetic picture of early Christianity and the wholly antipathetic image of the magician of Talmudic and post-Talmudic Jewish literature. “Wise man” and “performer of paradoxical deeds” are genuinely Josephan phrases that no Christian interpolator would have found potent enough to describe the divinised Christ of the later church.

The contour of the historical Jesus, lifted from the Synoptic Gospels, suggests a magnetic prophetic figure who was convinced that the aim of his mission was to bring his repentant Jewish followers into God’s new realm. This kingdom of heaven was foreseen in many of Jesus’s parables as the outcome of a quiet and imperceptible change rather than a cataclysmic transformation in the not too distant future. It would seem, according to the evangelists, that Jesus considered himself, and his well-disposed contemporaries depicted him, along such prophetic-charismatic lines.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
bor
September 6th, 2008
1:09 PM
'Veracity vouchsafed by faith' is all well and good, but I still think there are two variables basic to any belief. First, a person has to be carrying the 'religion gene'. Following that, place imposes its reality. That is too say, have the 'gene' and come from a christian influence, and guess what? Dollars to donuts, people will fall somewhere along the bible line. Have the 'gene' and come from some other influence, and, bob's-yer-uncle!! This is as simple as it gets.

Jon
September 6th, 2008
5:09 AM
"To conclude, because of the cross, the task of Jesus remained unfinished." I am confused. What was unfinished? His purpose and mission was the cross. In John 19:30 he says "It is finished" just before dying on the cross.

bipolar2
September 5th, 2008
9:09 PM
** what would Luthor do? ** Too bad this isn't a parody site, complete with parody responses. Amazing how fatuous the claims of the big-3 monotheisms sound. They are equally odious and equally dispensable as ethical or ideological guides. Enough of bibliolators indulging in mere scripticism. -- What they claim has no more intellectual integrity or moral value than drunken geeks parsing comix at a Superman convention. What a fictionalized culture hero "Jesus" or "Moses" or "Mohammed" would do is irrelevant. As irrelevant as what Hercules, Sherlock Holmes, or Lex Luthor would do. Believers of every stripe and dung beetle academics of every hue -- it's over. Xian, judaic, islamic, zoroastrian mythologies are meaningless. Time has long since passed -- your rice bowls will be broken. bipolar2

Anonymous
September 5th, 2008
8:09 PM
In regards to the resurrection: I heard a fact a few years back that Romans specifically outlawed grave robbing in the 1st Century. This "could" be linked to the story of the resurrection? I can't confirm this fact, however. So take this account at face value only.

Eliyahu
September 5th, 2008
4:09 AM
A bit of a tiptoe through the tulips, but not very enlightening or scholarly. How about a Jewish Ribi named Yehoshua who came to call only the Jews that had strayed from Torah back to Torah. How about the Mashiach who would fight the battles of HaSheim which was to heal the breaches in Torah. What is this misojudaic term Palestine. The term which was only created after the second war of 135. No, this article may be closer to the truth but it is a far way off still. By the way if you don't mind I will call Geza, Georgine. After all that would only be right. Helloooo J-e-s-u-s never existed. As you said so weakly "a form......would have perplexed......" so Yehoshua would have been incensed to be called J-e-s-u-s, a non-existant Roman idol.

Anonymous
September 4th, 2008
9:09 PM
Jesus resurrection is as historical fact as Jesus curing the leper. Mr Vermes don ´t question Jesus supernatural powers. They are indeed the "authority" of his learnig. And the fact is attested by a handful hundred of people, Paul said in his epistles. It deserves some consideration, like so many historical facts taken like truth but more scarcely attested. I read your classical book, Mr Vermes, Jesus the Jew, and I will read this one you say. Thanks for the counsel and the article.

Geza Vermes
September 4th, 2008
2:09 PM
Those interested in my views concerning the resurrection of Jesus should glance at my book, The Resurrection, published by Penguin earlier this year.

Richard
September 4th, 2008
12:09 PM
A more than interesting summary of scholarship and remaining challenges. The damage done through misconception and misrepresentation of Jesus is beyond calculation -- and with unlimited potential to recur. Hence the great value of such analysis in triaging human bad behavior. Finally, it is well to omit discussion of the resurrection, a thoroughly vexatious topic, in a text addressing the "likely historical"reception of Jesus -- one actor among many in the religious theater of his times.

Anonymous
September 3rd, 2008
12:09 PM
An interesting article but Vermes don ´t mention resurrection. And I think in this very point his paralelism with the other prophet Hanina Ben Dosa crumbles and disappears. The christians believe for Christ ´s resurrection ´s sake, said Paul. And Vermes omits the miracolous thing: a depressed team, Christ ´s group, runing to convince all the world of their Master ´s resurrection. By the way, Vermes don ´t mention the Facts of the Apostles, as canonical writing as the gospels and surely writeen by one of the evangelists.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.