You are here:   Andrew Breitbart > Underrated: Andrew Breitbart
 

To be sure, Breitbart wasn't perfect. He was more of a political activist and populist conservative than a true conservative intellectual. This doesn't mean he wasn't a bright and talented individual — by all accounts, he was — but rather that his methods were more of the smash-mouth, or brute force, variety. 

There were great successes.  He brought down Anthony Weiner after the Democratic congressman denied, and later acknowledged that a sexually explicit photograph he had sent to a young woman via Twitter (which was subsequently posted on BigJournalism.com) was of him.

There were also missteps. In one example, his big revelation about Department of Agriculture official Shirley Sherrod — and her subsequent removal — turned sour after a short, edited video clip of her speech to the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People was found to have taken her views on race out of context.

Breitbart's legacy should be judged by what he helped accomplish for conservatism, in the US and beyond. He helped create a more vocal and active movement. He assembled a team of young and seasoned political commentators, who will continue to fight for the ideas and values he treasured. He taught conservatives to challenge the mainstream media's liberal bias, and use citizen journalism to reveal the truth.

Andrew Breitbart may have died young, but he walked a million miles in his shoes for conservatives. Requiescat in pace

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
wam31962
April 4th, 2012
8:04 PM
Breitbart really was a giant for good in American journalism. If awards like the Pulitzer Prize still had any real objectivity and worth, then Breitbart and James O'Keefe would easily have won them. This article does a good job, except that I would argue with placing David Frum on "the Right."

Therealguyfaux
March 28th, 2012
1:03 PM
Andrew Breitbart was a "Who's he?" in Britain because Britons probably felt he wouldn't have spoken to their concerns about the US, which are of the "Are we getting pulled into another war?" or "What will the US Government do that could jeopardise my dollar-denominated investments?" All well and fine he was an American Guido Fawkes, but I doubt that many Americans would find order-order.com compelling reading if they do not have business interests in the UK. The kind of gotcha journalism done by AB and GF, when about politicians with whom you are not familiar, tends in the main to elicit the reaction of, "So what else is new? We have our own versions of these crooks!"

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.